Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
On page 368, 366 and 365 at a quick glance I found that I talked about the party as a whole, including party leaders, endorsing. Previous to that I called it the media and party as a whole and was pretty vocal about the liberal jihadIst in the streets.
Liberal jihadIst out there burning cars, causing and inflicting violence, marching in the streets and stopping traffic, shutting down businesses, etc, etc. You wouldn't see the other side attempting to destroy the nation because they didn't get their way. Liberals have declared jihad against America.
There will be instances like this on all sides. Difference is... your side endorses it.
Most of the hate crimes alleged that were pro trump turned out to be faked. Turned out to be liberals trying to paint trump as a white supremacist. But what would I call a group that did that? I would call them a hate group. I would denounce them as quick as I would denounce the terrorist group known as black lives matter. Did the Democrat party denounce black lives matter? Did they denounce the groups creating havoc out there right now protesting in the street and beating people up for being trump supporters?
Like I said, I'm not talking about instances of violence. I'm talking about a party that endorses the groups that cause the violence. I'm talking about riots and mobs not single instances. I can point out a mob of black lives matter protesters chanting kill cops especially the white ones and then black lives matter people actually kill cops and you come back with a guy walking into a church shooting people. Not the same. I can point out instances where the Democrat leaders including the president defending and clearly siding with said organizations and you can come back with white racist guy voted republican. I'm not moving the goal post. Your putting a net in front of it when it's my turn to kick a field goal.
And you know darn well I'm not talking about single instances.
I'm talking about the party and the mob in the streets. You can find instances of racism and violence on both sides. I'm not talking about just random acts and you know this.
You don't have a leg to stand on in this argument so your making the conversation twist and turn.
The radical racist group black lives matter is out there in mobs causing violence and preaching hatred towards the government and towards white people. Yet, Obama welcomes them to the white house, Clinton praises them and when Bernie sanders shouts "all lives matter" he has to quickly retract so his party doesn't turn on him. Wake me up when trump invites the Arian brotherhood to the white house. The left has gone so radical that conservatives can't give speeches in colleges. Republican town halls are being shut down, free speech is being trampled, liberals are going to conservative events to cause violence and chaos. You say you can point out the white supremacist chanting kill black people and a few do it? Well, from one of @Eman's post I could say it's only a small percentage that actually do the violence so basically you can't condemn the whole group, right? But instead i will say that would be a racist hate group that deserves any term they are called. And if the republican party invites them to the white house or stands by their side I will disavow the republican party. But we got Obama standing side by side with the "new black panther" party at a function and when he takes office drops charges when they were caught voter suppressing with Billy clubs at the voting areas. I could go on all day. But I have to get back to work so I can support a liberal. Lol.
Just keep reading my last post as it debunks your posts like as if it was on loop.These are your quotes from pages 364-368. You start off by saying liberals burn cars, cause violence, etc. Are you talking about the Democratic Party including Obama and other Democratic Party leaders bc I sure as hell don't remember Obama ever burning cars on fire lol. Logic says you meant normal people, not party leaders who are doing these things since it's not the leaders. You also state no one on the other side would do anything remotely similar.
Then when confronted with evidence that "your side" does it too, you change the story to "only one side endorses it". Then confronted with more evidence that "your side" endorses it as well, the story changes yet again.
Here you make mention of BLM. Does black lives matter represent the democrats? Did Donald trump denounce the white guys who murdered an undocumented immigrant??? Nope, he said, and I quote, "maybe they should have roughed him up". Did trump denounce the white supremacists who preach violence against minorities???
This post we've already poked enough holes in to make it leak like Trump's White House lol.
Really I did?!?! Apparently Eman and myself both thought otherwise as well as possibly Dr. Scally and Millard Baker.
Yes you can find violence on both sides but you seem prejudicial towards only one side and conveniently ignore the other.
That's called projection when you defend against your own unconscious impulses and qualities by denying they exist in you and while attributing them to others....
This is why law enforcement views conservative extremists as more dangerous to Americans than Muslim extremists are? That's why right wing extremists are more dangerous than BLM?
Or how about republicans threatening to expose voter choices if they didn't vote republican in Iowa and Florida? How about a north Caroline senator threatening black people with jail time if they voted? These aren't voter suppression methods of those wacky conservative jihadists?
Obama invited Deray McKesson to the White House yes. Deray did not commit any violence, he did not instigate violence, he spoke out against the violence in Dallas and Baton Rouge, he is a lecturer at Yale university, he writes part time for a large newspaper, he's worked with unprivileged kids in inner city youth groups, and also worked for the Baltimore school system....um yea, I'm really crying a river that he was invited to the White House to meet with law enforcement officials to try and find common ground
And to your point about if republicans invite hate groups to the White House, does that include people who violate even the most basic human right to life? Bc trump invited Rodrigo Duterte to come to the White House. I'll wait your disavowment
Kushners Set to Get $400 Million From Chinese Firm on Tower
A company owned by the family of Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser, stands to receive more than $400 million from a prominent Chinese company that is investing in the Kushners’ marquee Manhattan office tower at 666 Fifth Ave.
The planned $4-billion transaction includes terms that some real estate experts consider unusually favorable for the Kushners. It provides them with both a sizable cash payout from Anbang Insurance Group for a property that has struggled financially and an equity stake in a new partnership.
The details of the agreement, which is being circulated to attract additional investors, were shared with Bloomberg. It would make business partners of Kushner Cos. and Anbang, whose murky links to the Chinese power structure have raised national security concerns over its U.S. investments. In the process, an existing mortgage owed by the Kushners will be slashed to about a fifth of its current amount.