Trump Timeline ... Trumpocalypse

It doesn't have to...
Yes, it does. We have the right to form militias. We have the right to self defense. If the government has weapons that can kill us by the hundreds and thousands we must have weapons to defend ourselves.

If we ever have a revolution you will be begging for protection.

I have many high powered rifles, many of my friends do too. We are not a danger to anyone. We will be if we have to but we all pray that it won't be necassary.
 
So, if you want to fix the problem of these mass shootings then tell your liberal buddies to stop buying guns and shooting places up.

Holy shit. Are you retarded? Seriously, are you? Only liberals commit shootings? The liberals that want more gun control? The gun control opposed by conservatives?
 
We are limited to rounds with a diameter of no more than .5”. You don’t hear gun enthusiasts complaining of this. I carry a 1911 chambered in .50gi. I would carry a round in .60 if I could, but you don’t here me complaining.

Bump stocks are legal, but the fearmongering has started. They are going for > $400 on gunbroker. I wish the left would realize that every time they cry gun control, people go out and buy mass amounts of guns and ammunition. It makes one wonder what their agenda is.

I agree with a couple posts up that if the shooter calculated each round he fired, his kill rate would have been much higher. You can’t control automatic gun fire as the muzzle rises each time a round is fired. That is why the 3 round burst replaced fully automatic in hand carryable weapons. Full auto is used to scare the enemy to keep their heads down in order to lay down cover fire so your troops can advance. He had 40 minutes to shoot but only fired for 9. We are lucky he used a bump stock and gat crank vs a suppressed single shot. By the sound of his long volleys, I would guess that he used the gat crank which made him so much less effective. Thank God this guy didn’t know wtf he was doing!
 
Holy shit. Are you retarded? Seriously, are you? Only liberals commit shootings? The liberals that want more gun control? The gun control opposed by conservatives?
No, just a vast majority of them.
 


In the spring of 2012, Donald Trump’s two eldest children, Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump Jr., found themselves in a precarious legal position. For two years, prosecutors in the Manhattan District Attorney’s office had been building a criminal case against them for misleading prospective buyers of units in the Trump SoHo, a hotel and condo development that was failing to sell. Despite the best efforts of the siblings’ defense team, the case had not gone away. An indictment seemed like a real possibility. The evidence included emails from the Trumps making clear that they were aware they were using inflated figures about how well the condos were selling to lure buyers.

In one email, according to four people who have seen it, the Trumps discussed how to coordinate false information they had given to prospective buyers. In another, according to a person who read the emails, they worried that a reporter might be onto them. In yet another, Donald Jr. spoke reassuringly to a broker who was concerned about the false statements, saying that nobody would ever find out, because only people on the email chain or in the Trump Organization knew about the deception, according to a person who saw the email.

There was “no doubt” that the Trump children “approved, knew of, agreed to, and intentionally inflated the numbers to make more sales,” one person who saw the emails told us. “They knew it was wrong.”

In 2010, when the Major Economic Crimes Bureau of the D.A.’s office opened an investigation of the siblings, the Trump Organization had hired several top New York criminal defense lawyers to represent Donald Jr. and Ivanka. These attorneys had met with prosecutors in the bureau several times. They conceded that their clients had made exaggerated claims, but argued that the overstatements didn’t amount to criminal misconduct. Still, the case dragged on. In a meeting with the defense team, Donald Trump, Sr., expressed frustration that the investigation had not been closed. Soon after, his longtime personal lawyer, Marc Kasowitz entered the case.

Kasowitz, who by then had been the elder Donald Trump’s attorney for a decade, is primarily a civil litigator with little experience in criminal matters. But in 2012, Kasowitz donated $25,000 to the reelection campaign of Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr., making Kasowitz one of Vance’s largest donors. Kasowitz decided to bypass the lower level prosecutors and went directly to Vance to ask that the investigation be dropped.

On May 16, 2012, Kasowitz visited Vance’s office at One Hogan Place in downtown Manhattan — a faded edifice made famous by the television show, “Law & Order.” Dan Alonso, the chief assistant district attorney, and Adam Kaufmann, the chief of the investigative division, were also at the meeting, but no one from the Major Economic Crimes Bureau attended. Kasowitz did not introduce any new arguments or facts during his session. He simply repeated the arguments that the other defense lawyers had been making for months.

Ultimately, Vance overruled his own prosecutors. Three months after the meeting, he told them to drop the case. Kasowitz subsequently boasted to colleagues about representing the Trump children, according to two people. He said that the case was “really dangerous,” one person said, and that it was “amazing I got them off.” (Kasowitz denied making such a statement.)
 
...
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2017-10-04 at 2.59.40 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-10-04 at 2.59.40 PM.png
    66 KB · Views: 8
  • Screen Shot 2017-10-04 at 2.59.23 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-10-04 at 2.59.23 PM.png
    79.7 KB · Views: 7
  • Screen Shot 2017-10-04 at 2.59.04 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-10-04 at 2.59.04 PM.png
    172.4 KB · Views: 7
  • Screen Shot 2017-10-04 at 2.58.22 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-10-04 at 2.58.22 PM.png
    74.9 KB · Views: 7
Top