UK GENTECH LABS

Trying the var at 120mg a day for 4 to 6 weeks . 2nd day and starting to feel the pumps. Looks like this stuff is going to be good.
 
yes 1 week and noticing gains in strength, 9 weeks to go. :)

You clown shills are getting on my nerves. You aren't going to notice gains in one week on pharm grade test, much less some underground bullshit. Get some better game and at least bring it with something that makes sense. No one is going to buy that garbage line, or at least no one with any experience.
 
yes 1 week and noticing gains in strength, 9 weeks to go. :-)

You haven't noticed shit in 1 week, shilly rabbit!!

Trying the var at 120mg a day for 4 to 6 weeks . 2nd day and starting to feel the pumps. Looks like this stuff is going to be good.

That's some horrible shit if you need to run it at 120mg/day. No reason to ever go over 40mg if it's good var.
 
I agree with JB on this one, if you have to run it at 120mg then its weak! I have taken Var up to 60mg and it was too much, because the pumps that I was getting were like charley horses and were painful as hell. If its good Var 40mg a week is fine....
 
Even good var needs to be run 75mg or over if run on its own so lets stop the bull about 40mg etc. Have tried around 100mg dhacks before. Giving 120mg a go as im using it on its own. 2 days in and the pumps are immense.
 
Well I think may be 120mgs was a bad idea. Starting to get cramps in my bi's whilst driving and carring goods. Should I take it down to 90mgs or can someone recommend a supplement for the cramps?

Currently using 50mg breakfast, 50mg afternoon and 20mg before bed.

Would 20mg breakfast, 50mg afternoon and 20mg at night be a better idea?

P.s. i train about 2 hrs after taking 50mgs.

Thanks in advance.
 
A fellow researcher at the university I work for run an GCMS spectra and spectofotometry for me on the TrA of GenTech labs.

The results came back really good. The GCMS spectra identified that 4 elements are in the oil - oil, BA, BB, tren ace and unknown contaminant. The comparisons with the standard sample of TrA through spectrofotometry suggested the trenbolone content is 105mg / gram of oil, which is roughly 100mg for 1ml.

This is not my area of expertise (I work in medical ethics) but I trust him 100% (as he is a friend and he actively researching aas in an analytical chemistry context).

Please see attached the OIL1-2.pdf for more information.

It should be noted that the spectofotometry machine outputs blinking numbers (they look like this http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/@api/deki/files/8472/Spc20Blnk.gif) that you compare them to a function from standard. As such I have no spectofotometry report. I am thinking of taking a photo of the actual machine, timestamp it and write my name and meso in it as proof.

Please note that I did this for my own benefit as I spend hundreds of pounds in bullshit gear.

If you have any questions please let me know and I will relay them to my friend for answers. However, it may take a while. Also, if you want me to test anything else let me know. I can test pretty much anything I can get my hands on.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
A fellow researcher at the university I work for run an GCMS spectra and spectofotometry for me on the TrA of GenTech labs.

The results came back really good. The GCMS spectra identified that 4 elements are in the oil - oil, BA, BB, tren ace and unknown contaminant. The comparisons with the standard sample of TrA through spectrofotometry suggested the trenbolone content is 105mg / gram of oil, which is roughly 100mg for 1ml.

This is not my area of expertise (I work in medical ethics) but I trust him 100% (as he is a friend and he actively researching aas in an analytical chemistry context).

Please see attached the OIL1-2.pdf for more information.

It should be noted that the spectofotometry machine outputs blinking numbers (they look like this http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/@api/deki/files/8472/Spc20Blnk.gif) that you compare them to a function from standard. As such I have no spectofotometry report. I am thinking of taking a photo of the actual machine, timestamp it and write my name and meso in it as proof.

Please note that I did this for my own benefit as I spend hundreds of pounds in bullshit gear.

If you have any questions please let me know and I will relay them to my friend for answers. However, it may take a while. Also, if you want me to test anything else let me know. I can test pretty much anything I can get my hands on.

So you gave this testing facility a sample to test and what else did they ask for? Like what are you/we looking for?

I don't know what your spending your money on bc ALL analyses MUST be compared to known AAS standard in REAL TIME. There are NO graphic substitutes, period!

This is exactly the kind of data that perhaps Sworder was referring to as being "easily faked".

Have you any idea what else is MISSING in this "report"? Hint look at the "HPLC thread" I started a while back then ask for your money back unless they can mail you the COMPLETE report!
 
Last edited:
Sorry mate but although PHOTOSPEC or GS/MS are quite useful to identify sample compounds NONE are capable of sample QUANTIFICATION!
 
Well I think may be 120mgs was a bad idea. Starting to get cramps in my bi's whilst driving and carring goods. Should I take it down to 90mgs or can someone recommend a supplement for the cramps?

Currently using 50mg breakfast, 50mg afternoon and 20mg before bed.

Would 20mg breakfast, 50mg afternoon and 20mg at night be a better idea?

P.s. i train about 2 hrs after taking 50mgs.

Thanks in advance.

Hark in walks another FOUR POST GENTECH SHILL!
 
You haven't noticed shit in 1 week, shilly rabbit!!



That's some horrible shit if you need to run it at 120mg/day. No reason to ever go over 40mg if it's good var.

Now that's not true JB, bc it's entirely consistent with GETM products from yesteryear :)
 
Back
Top