MESO-Rx

Anabolic Steroids

UK GENTECH LABS

Since you've made up your mind, Will, don't spend a bunch and don't have high hopes. If it works out, great. If not, this will be your first burn. Good luck.
 
Greendog what do you think? You think I am mad for doing it? I just don't know how I will ever know if I don't go for it, the same gets said for every source?
 
What's the debate? We have a couple of bullshit shills. A fake lab report and a guy telling us how amped up he is after one week of test. This isn't even a credible shill job. I haven't shilled a day in my life and i could come up with better material than this shit just from watching for the past 6 months on this board and ab. This is amateur shill night and isn't fooling anyone.
 
devildog93 said:
What's the debate? We have a couple of bullshit shills. A fake lab report and a guy telling us how amped up he is after one week of test. This isn't even a credible shill job. I haven't shilled a day in my life and i could come up with better material than this shit just from watching for the past 6 months on this board and ab. This is amateur shill night and isn't fooling anyone.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I think I would at least post an intro, before I decided to shill. If I was smart, I would even start posting a few months before the source even got here. These mother fuckers need to work harder if they want to scam. What happened to the "long con"? This newer generation is just too lazy. Haha!
 
Read my intro and then tell me what you think I am no shill and I don't know how many times I have to say this! Shit I might just ask gentech for an application form!!
 
WILL.E.NAYLER said:
Greendog what do you think? You think I am mad for doing it? I just don't know how I will ever know if I don't go for it, the same gets said for every source?[/QUOTE
What I think is, this lab is very questionable and I would not pull the trigger on them. Patience grasshopper, there are many other labs out there that do not have the baggage this one has.
Click to expand...
 
nahkbez said:
Even good var needs to be run 75mg or over if run on its own so lets stop the bull about 40mg etc. Have tried around 100mg dhacks before. Giving 120mg a go as im using it on its own. 2 days in and the pumps are immense.
Click to expand...

You obviously have never had good Var.....
 
So at 3:25 your posting this shit?

nahkbez said:
Even good var needs to be run 75mg or over if run on its own so lets stop the bull about 40mg etc. Have tried around 100mg dhacks before. Giving 120mg a go as im using it on its own. 2 days in and the pumps are immense.
Click to expand...

Then at 3:51 exactly 26 minutes later your posting this shit?

nahkbez said:
Well I think may be 120mgs was a bad idea. Starting to get cramps in my bi's whilst driving and carring goods. Should I take it down to 90mgs or can someone recommend a supplement for the cramps?

Currently using 50mg breakfast, 50mg afternoon and 20mg before bed.

Would 20mg breakfast, 50mg afternoon and 20mg at night be a better idea?

P.s. i train about 2 hrs after taking 50mgs.

Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...

Sounds like bullshit to me.......
 
Dr JIM said:
So you gave this testing facility a sample to test and what else did they ask for? Like what are you/we looking for?

I don't know what your spending your money on bc ALL analyses MUST be compared to known AAS standard in REAL TIME. There are NO graphic substitutes, period!

This is exactly the kind of data that perhaps Sworder was referring to as being "easily faked".

Have you any idea what else is MISSING in this "report"? Hint look at the "HPLC thread" I started a while back then ask for your money back unless they can mail you the COMPLETE report!
Click to expand...

I paid nothing. I work at this facility. I asked my friend to test purity and tell me the concentration. He did the comparison to real AAS as he used an 100% purity sample of TrA when he did the spectrofotometry. I am 100% confident on his conclusions.
 
devildog93 said:
What's the debate? We have a couple of bullshit shills. A fake lab report and a guy telling us how amped up he is after one week of test. This isn't even a credible shill job. I haven't shilled a day in my life and i could come up with better material than this shit just from watching for the past 6 months on this board and ab. This is amateur shill night and isn't fooling anyone.
Click to expand...

Prove that the report I produced is fake. If you cant please dont post crap.
 
No longer getting embroiled in the argument, my gear from this lab is good, that's all I care about, the lab is operating from London and I live in Dundee so god only knows how I am somehow involved as a plant? This is hilarious, keep the laughs coming folks.
 
@karbonk The gear NOW is good. The MS/FS illustrates that as well. We DONT know how the gear is going to be in 3 or 5 months or 10 months from now. We need to keep repeating the tests. That is the main issue at my mind.
 
karbonk said:
No longer getting embroiled in the argument, my gear from this lab is good, that's all I care about, the lab is operating from London and I live in Dundee so god only knows how I am somehow involved as a plant? This is hilarious, keep the laughs coming folks.
Click to expand...

You are new here. People here are weary and they have several good reasons to do so. Many sources fucked people here. One even run away with my 300 pounds. I can understand them. That is why I actually went the extra mile and did the bloody testing.. as I cant be arsed with stupid gear any more. I must have spend over a 1000 pounds in bunk, or severely underdosed gear. Noble, Renvex, Am-tech etc. Ive been trying to run a tren cycle for ages and I couldnt only because the gear was REALLY bad. That is when I gave up and talk to the lab technitian if he could do some testing in the side.
Anyway, now I have a contact. We might as well use him to test more labs.
 
Really? Interesting bc unless he has a DEA number or operates a DEA certified lab his access to a Tren-A standard will be VERY LIMITED at best fella.

Shit just inquire about the facility where the standards were obtained. No please don't post a name.

Then ask him why no calibration curve was printed for comparison or why the procedure used was not mentioned.

Finally also ask him how he obtained results using a device with an absorbance range of 340 to 910nm on a substance, such as Tren-A, with an optimal absorbance of 240nm!

You just can't slam all that crap into a Spec and obtain results, the constituents MUST first be isolated into individual compounds and then run SEPARATELY.

If this is not done the absorbance measurement will be that of all the constituents COMBINED!

A considerable amount of this also applies to the GS/MS. That's bc substances fragment at different rates, depending upon several factors.

If you just run an oil with the BA, NaB, Tren-A and a monoglyceride in a MS the fragments will form dimers trimers and sodium adducts for sure. Now that's excluding any other adulterants EVERY UGL uses in their formulation.

How odd is it NO sodium adducts or adulterants were detected, only those substances that were likely listed on the vial labeling..

Sorry but IME data recovery of this nature only occurs when the tester is informed of what the contents are supposed to be!

Similar results we have all seen before, and are referred to as a "lump-o-gram" by some chemists.

Someone is feeding you a line of poop fella,

I welcome him onto Meso to debate or contest these issues further.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

FUYAO
FUYAO Peptides: Best quality and prices
2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
3K
accidentaljedi173
accidentaljedi173
S
SEANBIO
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
peptides
peptides
Arail
Arail Pharmaceuticals - US Domestic
2 3
Replies
56
Views
4K
Arail
Arail
el_traficante
General Pharmaceuticals - EU Domestic & International
2 3
Replies
49
Views
6K
el_traficante
el_traficante
Anabolic Empire
Anabolic Empire - EU Domestic
5 6 7
Replies
137
Views
17K
Dec1214
D

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top