W&M Analytical Liaison (U.S. Domestic)

No, I do not see how. My lab is in USA and I am not getting in testing controlled substances to get in trouble with LE.

Simec is in Switzerland where they have different laws and as far as I remember they did not want to take more samples from USA.
Being in the US, what ways are there to get around reporting usage each time a substance is tested, if any?
 
No, I do not see how. My lab is in USA and I am not getting in testing controlled substances to get in trouble with LE.

Simec is in Switzerland where they have different laws and as far as I remember they did not want to take more samples from USA.
thanks for your solutions dickhead, go back to selling your colored water and shut the fuck up
 
Being in the US, what ways are there to get around reporting usage each time a substance is tested, if any?

what do you mean getting around ? you can have somebody coming with samples after hours so nobody else can see it. once it is splashed all over the internet you get attention of LE.

but it is not worth plus you have to deal with all the dickheads here and argue all day.

what kind of business is it ? while you have regular and respectful customers paying $300 + for testing and you do not break any law.
 
what do you mean getting around ? you can have somebody coming with samples after hours so nobody else can see it. once it is splashed all over the internet you get attention of LE.

but it is not worth plus you have to deal with all the dickheads here and argue all day.

what kind of business is it ? while you have regular and respectful customers paying $300 + for testing and you do not break any law.
@Weights & Measures, my recommendation is that you put this guy on ignore
 
what do you mean getting around ? you can have somebody coming with samples after hours so nobody else can see it. once it is splashed all over the internet you get attention of LE.

but it is not worth plus you have to deal with all the dickheads here and argue all day.

what kind of business is it ? while you have regular and respectful customers paying $300 + for testing and you do not break any law.
My understanding is limited when it comes to this. I was of the understanding that when these standards are purchased, each time they are utilized a report is issued on its usage. Therefore being in the States, any lab using these will have reports of AAS being tested.
 
My understanding is limited when it comes to this. I was of the understanding that when these standards are purchased, each time they are utilized a report is issued on its usage. Therefore being in the States, any lab using these will have reports of AAS being tested.

no lab is USA is doing it. unless all paperwork / permits are in order.

once you start doing it you have all the dickheads calling 24/7 like it is open crack house and letting everybody to know about it on internet.

google professor from Texas he was under nick Angus testing for UGLs for a while until one day they knocked at his door with arrest warrant.
 
google professor from Texas he was under nick Angus testing for UGLs for a while until one day they knocked at his door with arrest warrant.
Just for testing??? I’m sure they tacked on possession as well, even though it probably didn’t amount to shit, volume wise.
 
Just for testing??? I’m sure they tacked on possession as well, even though it probably didn’t amount to shit, volume wise.

He was charged with possession and/or handing controlled substance. google university professor from Texas. there is a whole story.

I talked to this guy over emails long time ago, very smart guy. He got himself in a mess and lost good career.

I do not see testing for some dickheads and break the law while I have plenty of other work.
 
if you know indeed the address and person doing it then I can take you seriously.

retyping some rumors or what others say makes you clueless dickhead falling for every fake news

What in the fuck are you even talking about?

Take me seriously about what?

All I am asking/suggesting is that you HAVE A CLUE ABOUT THE SOURCE YOU ARE ATTACKING when you come in here and start shit.

You obviously had no knowledge about this testing source, and no understanding of the details of his services when you started throwing accusations, despite the fact that it is ALL THERE IN THE BEGINNING OF THE THREAD, which kills any credibility you have about this source.

You couldn't be bothered to read the first page or two, yet you start posting derogatory remarks about him.
 
no lab is USA is doing it. unless all paperwork / permits are in order.

once you start doing it you have all the dickheads calling 24/7 like it is open crack house and letting everybody to know about it on internet.

google professor from Texas he was under nick Angus testing for UGLs for a while until one day they knocked at his door with arrest warrant.
OK jackass, now you are just being intentionally inflammatory.
I'm sure there is some 19 year old reading on here; and thinks you may have a clue what you are talking about. I don't know analytical chemistry; but I do know my country, the law, and the English language. This is the last time I will give any of this info; so pay attention:

According to the 3-letter website: "As of December 2017, more than 590 researchers were registered with DEA to study Schedule I substances. Every researcher who has submitted a valid research proposal has been approved. Many researchers conduct multiple research protocols, so the number of approved studies with Schedule I substances exceeds the number of registered researchers."

There are 33 states, plus the District of Columbia, that have medicinal use and prescription laws that justify the legality of prescription and possession of at least one of the drugs on the Schedule-1 list.

I am fortunate enough to know a guy who knows a guy who made his fortune off of LEGALLY testing at least one of the drugs on the Schedule-1 list. While there is a line between medicinal and research chemistry on these substances; the law is not concerned with what analysis the researcher/chemist performs, as long as the permit is legitimate (form 225, I think).

So, the service I offer is done by and ACCREDITED lab, by a research chemist with a LICENSE to perform analysis on Schedule-1 drugs (and of course Schedules II-V as well).

Whether he reports or logs how he uses standards and who he does work for: I do not know or care.

I am doing this to help out guys on a forum that I truly believe exists to better the health and lifestyle of its members.
I have know clue what in the actual fuck your motives are; but, after a search of your posts, I cannot find any valuable contribution you have offered.

I will not reply to your comments after this post; so save the skin on your fingertips if you are expecting one.


What sucks the most is that I was actually having a good day until you reminded me that I am a member of a species that continues to prevent natural selection from exterminating fucktards like you.
 
OK jackass, now you are just being intentionally inflammatory.
I'm sure there is some 19 year old reading on here; and thinks you may have a clue what you are talking about. I don't know analytical chemistry; but I do know my country, the law, and the English language. This is the last time I will give any of this info; so pay attention:

According to the 3-letter website: "As of December 2017, more than 590 researchers were registered with DEA to study Schedule I substances. Every researcher who has submitted a valid research proposal has been approved. Many researchers conduct multiple research protocols, so the number of approved studies with Schedule I substances exceeds the number of registered researchers."

There are 33 states, plus the District of Columbia, that have medicinal use and prescription laws that justify the legality of prescription and possession of at least one of the drugs on the Schedule-1 list.

I am fortunate enough to know a guy who knows a guy who made his fortune off of LEGALLY testing at least one of the drugs on the Schedule-1 list. While there is a line between medicinal and research chemistry on these substances; the law is not concerned with what analysis the researcher/chemist performs, as long as the permit is legitimate (form 225, I think).

So, the service I offer is done by and ACCREDITED lab, by a research chemist with a LICENSE to perform analysis on Schedule-1 drugs (and of course Schedules II-V as well).

Whether he reports or logs how he uses standards and who he does work for: I do not know or care.

I am doing this to help out guys on a forum that I truly believe exists to better the health and lifestyle of its members.
I have know clue what in the actual fuck your motives are; but, after a search of your posts, I cannot find any valuable contribution you have offered.

I will not reply to your comments after this post; so save the skin on your fingertips if you are expecting one.


What sucks the most is that I was actually having a good day until you reminded me that I am a member of a species that continues to prevent natural selection from exterminating fucktards like you.
Since I was recently asked and there was reference in my post, I feel like I need to mention this:

I do not accept any Schedule-1 substances for testing.
I really want nothing to do with Schedule-2s; but there are a couple of IINs that have benefits for kids, so I will cross that bridge when I get to it.
And no benzos.
 
It is so nice when someone who is ignored doesn’t create alerts that come to my phone. However, when I am tagged into a conversation; human nature prevents ignoring the curiosity about the conversation.
I bit; and saw the circle of bullshit in the other thread.
So with assertiveness, because that’s my style, let’s get this shit taken care of:

@mercury: you are an imbecile. There is no other way to put it. Just shut up.

@janoshik: I have enjoyed our prior civilized and mutually respectful communications in PM. However, your comment about putting “2 and 2 together” insinuates that I am engaged in some form of deception. This is not the first time this comment has been made; and I have previously ignored it. I’m off today and drinking beer; so my ability to remain quiet, in the midst of insinuations of foul play, has greatly diminished.
So, just like in a big game of poker; I call. Show me the “2s” in your hand; and tell me the sum of putting them together.

Also, @mercury, even though I tagged you twice; there is no need for your contributions in this conversation. You are not invited to a conversation with people that have critical thinking skills. You can go play in the road while we are talking.
 
It is so nice when someone who is ignored doesn’t create alerts that come to my phone. However, when I am tagged into a conversation; human nature prevents ignoring the curiosity about the conversation.
I bit; and saw the circle of bullshit in the other thread.
So with assertiveness, because that’s my style, let’s get this shit taken care of:

@mercury: you are an imbecile. There is no other way to put it. Just shut up.

@janoshik: I have enjoyed our prior civilized and mutually respectful communications in PM. However, your comment about putting “2 and 2 together” insinuates that I am engaged in some form of deception. This is not the first time this comment has been made; and I have previously ignored it. I’m off today and drinking beer; so my ability to remain quiet, in the midst of insinuations of foul play, has greatly diminished.
So, just like in a big game of poker; I call. Show me the “2s” in your hand; and tell me the sum of putting them together.

Also, @mercury, even though I tagged you twice; there is no need for your contributions in this conversation. You are not invited to a conversation with people that have critical thinking skills. You can go play in the road while we are talking.

F77BA87F-C90A-4ACB-A47F-D3D77DAF9525.jpeg
 
Having quite the same issue today, enjoying some great lager, EC.

I didn't really mind you as long as you are respectful and civilized towards me, but I was really hoping that people around here are smart enough to figure it out themselves. Well, fuck me for having my hopes up. Most people around here are straight up idiots.

Don't worry, I'll leave you alone. They deserve you.

PS: I enjoyed the conversations as well. Had you been honest with me since the start it would all have been great. We all make mistakes.
 
Last edited:
Having quite the same issue today, enjoying some great lager, EC.

I didn't really mind you as long as you are respectful and civilized towards me, but I was really hoping that people around here are smart enough to figure it out themselves. Well, fuck me for having my hopes up. Most people around here are straight up idiots.

Don't worry, I'll leave you alone. They deserve you.

PS: I enjoyed the conversations as well. Had you been honest with me since the start it would all have been great. We all make mistakes.

I am surprised that you waste time on idiot. He has nothing to say. He has no clue about chemistry, testing. He reminds me the guy from UK Chem Clarity, who was proven later to be scammer.

Ask him simple question he will have answer as fast as he can google it. And the way he is handing arguments shows that he lacks inteligent thinking. No respectable business is calling customers/ people the names he is using. I can jut say to him go away and fuck yourself idiot.
 
Back
Top