At that time I did not know him on a personal level and only knew of his reputation. Anyway, he sent me a PM or conversation as it is called on this forum stating that Dr. Jim was going to be going back to the university of T(not going to divulge full name) in a couple of weeks and was going to be performing the lab tests for him.
I checked and I still have the PM/conversation if proof is needed.
To summarize Dr. Jim did mands tests, told mands that it was good quality GH, told mands of the high purity, etc... and then spends page after page saying that mands tests doesn't prove its GH -------- I didn't want to stir up a whole bunch of shit.
Oh FYI MH I just noticed some very revealing information.
The PM you so willingly discuss on an open forum was unequivocally privileged information!
Fact is MANDS made it perfectly clear my name would NEVER be revealed, to anyone period.
However roughly one week after forwarding the analytical data to MANDS our entire EMAIL discussion including the facilities speciality, qualifications and specific laboratory niche, excluding my name, was posted on PROFESSIONAL MUSCLE's open forum for all to view.
Why, bc it seemed posting this information would provide further proof the analytical data obtained was GTG, thereby facilitating sales.
However now it's also patently obvious not only was my name released to a virtual unknown, MH, but also my employer and specific EMAILS that describe in detail our privileged discussions to some stranger whom you believed was someone worthy of establishing credibility with bc he was a PM "vet" with connections.
One can only imagine how many other PM vets were told of my name or our conversations thru glib shop talk or otherwise.
Or how did you put it MH "I did not know him (MANDS) on a personal level"!
Although the deletion of an individual/s or a lab facility name is a trite occurrence within laboratory science, especially when off label prescription drugs are involved, I also requested the removal of my personal data, bc the tests conducted could be mis-construed as being performed
"as an on duty activity"!
Of course that was never the case!
Finally MH unless you have access to these emails where you can cite my commentary verbatim, rather than paraphrasing scientific commentary where your fund of knowledge is obviously limited, give me a break about how I mistreated poor Karl your boss bc of some evanescent motive!
The fact is out of almost 7000 posts not ONE has been even remotely critical of K until this thread.
Why bc HIS WORDS ARE NOT AND HAVE NOT BEEN SUPPORTED BY THE EVIDENCE HE HAS POSTED, it's that simple!
MANDS my goodness I hope having K as "friend" was worth it.