In spite of all the members on all sides of the debate who publicly and privately have asked me to intervene and tell people what to think, who/what to believe and start banning people, I'm not going to do that.
But since
@muscle96ss questioned the integrity of MESO, I think it's appropriate for me to comment. I will address two specific accusations:
(1) MESO is "corrupt".
Do you really thinks MESO, by any stretch of the imagination, meets any such definition of corruption ie.: "dishonest or fraudulent conduct by those in power, typically involving bribery"?
MESO is an open and uncensored forum that allows all sides to be presented; it allows the exercise of free speech by all participants; and allows all arguments to be openly and transparently evaluated.
Of course, where there is free speech, there will be a lot of perspectives and a lot of agendas vying for the attention of readers. But one thing that an uncensored forum makes more probable than any other format is the presentation of the truth.
(2) MESO has "credibility issues".
The suggestion that MESO lacks credibility due to unsubstantiated accusations that it is driven by some hidden agenda is ludicrous. There is only one principle that drives the discussion: It is the freedom from censorship. If you have evidence to suggest otherwise, please post it.
The truth, or an increasingly closer approximation of the truth, is an inevitable outcome of an uncensored discussion.
The current thread, no matter how ugly and unsanitized it may be, is only further proof of this. Once again, all sides are being represented, information keeps coming out, no one is being protected, and it is all right here on MESO for everyone to evaluate.