whats better for fat loss? GH or DNP

Fronkthis

New Member
for example both would be layered into an AAS cycle.
DNP version:
10 days dnp followed by prop/tren/dbol for 6 weeks
another 10 days DNP followed by tren/primo/var for 5 more weeks.
dbol ends at week 4 same time as primo begins

GH version:
2 iu 2-3xdaily starting 2 weeks before AAS cycle (same as above)
and ending about a month after cycle ends.

lean mass gains are of no concern. Dnp is waaaay cheaper than GH.
only fat loss is desired, not concerned with GHs other attributes
 
GH has alot of health benifits. DNP can kill you. I think you know were I stand.
I'm sure dnp is the best fat burner around but I'd never take it unless I was obese.................11
 
You're kind of comparing apples and oranges here. I don't think anyone should use GH for fat loss, it's waaaaay too expensive for that, and DNP is not good for anything other than fat loss. If you want to cut, use DNP, and save the GH for your next cycle so you can kick things up that much more.
Regards,
-H-
 
RobbieH02879 said:
From what I've read from other users,definitely DNP.
PLUS IF YOU ARE PLANNING ON USING GH,PLAN ON BEING ION IT FOR A WHILE. MONTHS. ITS NOT MEANT TO BE USED FOR 8-12 WEKKS. WE ARE TALKING LOMGTERM FOR OPTIMUM RESULTS...VERY EXPENSIVE AND IT SEEMS YOU THINK 2 WEEKS OF GH WILL LOOSE THE WEIGHT. NO IT WONT GOIO WITH DNP THAN JUST BE FUCKING CAREFUL. THAT IS THE ONE COMPOUND I AM SCARRTED OF...I HAD A BLOOD INFECTION AND HAD THE SWEATS IN THE HOSPITAL FOR 5 DAYS. SOME OF YOU BROS MAY REMEMBER. IF I STARTED SWEATING KLIKE THAT AGAIN IT WOULD MAKE ME VERY NERVOUS. I MAY TRY IT ONE DAY BUT IM NOT READY YET..ONCE IM DONE WITH MY PHYSICAL THERAPY AND I HAVE A FEW WEEKS TO LAY AAROUND HERETIC I WILL BE TALKING TO YOU...
 
Thanks for the reply's guys. I think I will end up going the DNP route, as I hear is more effective of a fat burner. I am not obese, I just hate cardio, and would rather do anything but cardio. I do it but not everyday.

Strenght... Nothing in my post should lead you to believe that "I seem to think GH will take off fat in 2 weeks?"
I have done tons of research. I do know GH needs to be taken 6 months minimal to see best results. However I am not interested in any of its other effects JUST FAT BURNING. thats why I asked the question.

Thanks again guys.

I also like the idea of DNP clearing out receptors, does this really happen? has anyone noticed a difference with pre-cycle DNP use as regards to faster gains after DNP use has ceased?
 
sev1512 said:
Thanks for the reply's guys. I think I will end up going the DNP route, as I hear is more effective of a fat burner. I am not obese, I just hate cardio, and would rather do anything but cardio. I do it but not everyday.

Strenght... Nothing in my post should lead you to believe that "I seem to think GH will take off fat in 2 weeks?"
I have done tons of research. I do know GH needs to be taken 6 months minimal to see best results. However I am not interested in any of its other effects JUST FAT BURNING. thats why I asked the question.

Thanks again guys.

I also like the idea of DNP clearing out receptors, does this really happen? has anyone noticed a difference with pre-cycle DNP use as regards to faster gains after DNP use has ceased?

DNP and "receptor clearing" is an absolute myth. Receptor turnover is a very rapid/frequent event. The receptors you have today are not likely the receptors you'll have tomorrow, to put it simply. There is nothing that "cleans" receptors, as their lives aren't long enough to endure a "cleaning" anyway.
 
4545 said:
DNP hands down and its a shitload cheaper.

go with DNP, and be careful. Read up. You'll need to do 6 months worth of GH for it to do much good. Plus, the main purpose of GH is to regain some "youthfulness"...the weight loss is really a side effect of that.
 

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top