canucklifter
New Member
I've heard well known industry experts (S2H) cite 'DNP doesn't work without carbs', leading to a recommendation that you eat lots of fruit with DNP (trying to preferentially fill the liver with glycogen via fructose vs. slamming it into cells indiscriminately with glucose).
I don't really understand why this would make sense, or why 'carbohydrates are required for DNP to work'.
- DNP uncouples oxidative phospholyration, making the krebs cycle 'work harder' and waste some of it's generated energy as heat.
- The krebs cycle can be powered by glucose, or fat indirectly via gluconeogenesis. But glucose will be used preferentially, since it doesn't require gluconeogenesis to convert it into usable substrate.
So... if you eat carbs, you have more free glucose. So the krebs cycle uses that for energy. Cool.
But if you don't eat carbs, your body still needs energy. It has nowhere to go but fat to generate substrates for the krebs cycle.
So... wouldn't you burn MORE fat not eating carbohydrates?
More 'anecdotally' - if you don't eat carbs on DNP but maintain your activity levels, your energy needs aren't going to change drastically. Your BMR might get a bit suppressed (if you're not using T3), your NEAT might go down, but you still need pretty much the same energy to live. Since people aren't dropping dead by default when using DNP and just eating fat, it kind of disproves that carbs are needed for it to work. Your body can survive just fine (within reason) on it's body fat stores.
I was trying to find out if some part of the krebs cycle required a compound that could only be derived from carbs. Couldn't find one, because fat can be converted to glucose.
Then I thought... OK, maybe glucose is a more efficient way of providing some substrate, so that per unit of time more fat can be burned. For example if I need spaghetti and pasta sauce to make dinner, and I've got a shit ton of spaghetti (body fat) sitting around but no pasta sauce... if I can get more pasta sauce by either converting spaghetti to sauce (which is slow and expensive), or someone just gives me sauce, I can make dinner a lot faster if someone just gives me sauce. But with DNP it doesn't look like there's a way to just get 'sauce' (sauce being some carb derivative), I can only get sauce and spaghetti at the same time. So if my goal is to get rid of all the spaghetti I have sitting around, I kind of just need to (slowly) convert some of it to sauce.
Any biochemists around that can comment?
I don't really understand why this would make sense, or why 'carbohydrates are required for DNP to work'.
- DNP uncouples oxidative phospholyration, making the krebs cycle 'work harder' and waste some of it's generated energy as heat.
- The krebs cycle can be powered by glucose, or fat indirectly via gluconeogenesis. But glucose will be used preferentially, since it doesn't require gluconeogenesis to convert it into usable substrate.
So... if you eat carbs, you have more free glucose. So the krebs cycle uses that for energy. Cool.
But if you don't eat carbs, your body still needs energy. It has nowhere to go but fat to generate substrates for the krebs cycle.
So... wouldn't you burn MORE fat not eating carbohydrates?
More 'anecdotally' - if you don't eat carbs on DNP but maintain your activity levels, your energy needs aren't going to change drastically. Your BMR might get a bit suppressed (if you're not using T3), your NEAT might go down, but you still need pretty much the same energy to live. Since people aren't dropping dead by default when using DNP and just eating fat, it kind of disproves that carbs are needed for it to work. Your body can survive just fine (within reason) on it's body fat stores.
I was trying to find out if some part of the krebs cycle required a compound that could only be derived from carbs. Couldn't find one, because fat can be converted to glucose.
Then I thought... OK, maybe glucose is a more efficient way of providing some substrate, so that per unit of time more fat can be burned. For example if I need spaghetti and pasta sauce to make dinner, and I've got a shit ton of spaghetti (body fat) sitting around but no pasta sauce... if I can get more pasta sauce by either converting spaghetti to sauce (which is slow and expensive), or someone just gives me sauce, I can make dinner a lot faster if someone just gives me sauce. But with DNP it doesn't look like there's a way to just get 'sauce' (sauce being some carb derivative), I can only get sauce and spaghetti at the same time. So if my goal is to get rid of all the spaghetti I have sitting around, I kind of just need to (slowly) convert some of it to sauce.
Any biochemists around that can comment?