A Newbies Idea for all future sources looking to Sell here...

Dresden

Member
AnabolicLab.com Supporter
I know i AM VERY new to this board but I've been reading alot of the treads, especially the ones concerning new sources posting here. So i had a thought about that, now if its been posted before i apologize sincerely, but here goes...

Any member that wishes to advertise or sell gear on this board must first supply the boards Moderator(s)/Owner(s) with labs test results ( and even possibly video (like that dude AAVang) from a reputable source(s). anyone violating this screening procedure will have the post/thread deleted and account Banned.

This way we only get (in theory anyway), leads on gear from sources who truly believe in what they sell by submitting proof of potency.
 
I know i AM VERY new to this board but I've been reading alot of the treads, especially the ones concerning new sources posting here. So i had a thought about that, now if its been posted before i apologize sincerely, but here goes...

Any member that wishes to advertise or sell gear on this board must first supply the boards Moderator(s)/Owner(s) with labs test results ( and even possibly video (like that dude AAVang) from a reputable source(s). anyone violating this screening procedure will have the post/thread deleted and account Banned.

This way we only get (in theory anyway), leads on gear from sources who truly believe in what they sell by submitting proof of potency.
First that idea solves nothing considering any source that sends their own samples will simply send the best they have for the test. How does that stop them from sending total garbage to customers after passing that test with good numbers? Random testing from various batches over a consistent basis is a far better indicator.
 
First that idea solves nothing considering any source that sends their own samples will simply send the best they have for the test. How does that stop them from sending total garbage to customers after passing that test with good numbers? Random testing from various batches over a consistent basis is a far better indicator.
 
Then let then Let then send 3 random batch samples to the mods to test, along with sending payment for the tests..sort like an unofficial "membership fee", which is of course non refundable pass or fail.
 
Then let then Let then send 3 random batch samples to the mods to test, along with sending payment for the tests..sort like an unofficial "membership fee", which is of course non refundable pass or fail.
What you have is a decent idea with good intentions. However, if that were to happen, it would be "allowing" sources to come here to source. Or, encouraging them to. Making the idea of not being a source board non-existent.
 
It's actually a flawed and terrible idea. Allowing any source to be in control of what batch/sample is tested is pure stupidity and a waste of time.
Millard would not ever let that happen with anaboliclab.com as each sample is purchased at random and the lab has no knowledge who has purchased said sample. One ingenious way to keep labs on their toes and no they don't control the process.
 
It's actually a flawed and terrible idea. Allowing any source to be in control of what batch/sample is tested is pure stupidity and a waste of time.
In your opinion...most "sources" probably wouldn't want go through the process which would eliminate them anyway...those that would still have to go through the Mods/owners so if they have a doubt they could just refuse the source. Plus like i wrote after your post the source could just send 3 random samples to the moderator/owner plus the testing fees...
 
In your opinion...most "sources" probably wouldn't want go through the process which would eliminate them anyway...those that would still have to go through the Mods/owners so if they have a doubt they could just refuse the source. Plus like i wrote after your post the source could just send 3 random samples to the moderator/owner plus the testing fees...
Do you even read what you are posting? It doesn't matter if a source sends 30 samples. In the end the source is in control of what is sent. You can't have random testing when the source is the one supplying the samples. Again....the idea is flawed and doesn't accomplish anything.
 
We should not be doing anything to encourage them to try set up shop in the first place.

True, we have a few here. The very few that survive our culture may as well stay at this point. But there is no reason to hold the door for the rest.

In the end, the community will decide who lives here. It might look like a clusterfuck. But it works well enough.
 
Yes but many get driven off eventually. This board does not endorse any of the sources that try to set up shop here.
yeah i see that...and its not about endorsing, i'm thinking more along the lines of sources just setting up without any vetting.
 
Do you even read what you are posting? It doesn't matter if a source sends 30 samples. In the end the source is in control of what is sent. You can't have random testing when the source is the one supplying the samples. Again....the idea is flawed and doesn't accomplish anything.


i think it would be more constructive (and grown up) to help modify and improve the idea instead of rushing to criticize and shoot it down...

How about this, the source still has to go to the Mod/owner...then they wait while the mod makes a random purchase or 2 and sens it out for testing..if it comes back bunk..."denied"...If its legit..they get to make an intro and then the members make up their own mimds
 
We should not be doing anything to encourage them to try set up shop in the first place.

True, we have a few here. The very few that survive our culture may as well stay at this point. But there is no reason to hold the door for the rest.

In the end, the community will decide who lives here. It might look like a clusterfuck. But it works well enough.
Understood, but sometimes a little different approach doesnt hurt
 
Back
Top