Maybe the Nixon doctrine was the better statagy, a limited nuclear first strike.
Can I see a raise of hands?
Can I see a raise of hands?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, remember what we did when Russia took Crimea? Nothing but sanctions. The difference is Crimea had been Russia until Kruschev gave it to Ukraiine in '56, so all they had to do is have some "little green men" go in and take it without any shots being fired. The Donbas didn't have that kind of Russian support so they recruited and armed these militias, even gave them armored vehicles. That war in the Donbas solidified hatred on both sides.I'm no expert on Ukraine, but if there are parts of Ukraine that would rather be Russia, I think there are ways to find out and let the people there decide.
One thing some people worry about is what if they mobilize a million more people? But they can't supply the troops they have out there. These wouldn't be trained soldiers. They can only fire so many artillery rounds. They have lost their best tanks when the 1st Guards was routed and also with the javelin strikes around Kiev.I don't think Ukraine can defeat Russia if Russia goes all in, which it will, and it will by any means necessary.
You're so full of shit it's nauseating.One thing some people worry about is what if they mobilize a million more people? But they can't supply the troops they have out there. These wouldn't be trained soldiers. They can only fire so many artillery rounds. They have lost their best tanks when the 1st Guards was routed and also with the javelin strikes around Kiev.
So, some want to say they've got something else but their sleeve but this is likely the best they can do. They had a standing army of 900k when they invaded, they didn't invade with that many but you can bet they sent reinforcements from Moscow as needed.
That would be a good start. Then we have to figure out how to bring peace to people, primarily Ukranians, who will hate Russians for at least a couple generations.
And the thing that bothers General Bakshi is he's not in the US, Europe, or Russia yet he has to deal with the global economic consequences and nuclear risk too.Is making the planet uninhabitable the answer in any possible scenario?
That aid will allow Ukraine to continue fighting.
The question is how do we get past a man who knows he has a gun to his head and most likely will face the same outcome as Muammar Gaddafi if he fails.
One thing some people worry about is what if they mobilize a million more people? But they can't supply the troops they have out there. These wouldn't be trained soldiers. They can only fire so many artillery rounds. They have lost their best tanks when the 1st Guards was routed and also with the javelin strikes around Kiev.
So, some want to say they've got something else up their sleeve but this is likely the best they can do. They had a standing army of 900k when they invaded, they didn't invade with that many but you can bet they sent reinforcements from Moscow as needed.
Maybe the Nixon doctrine was the better statagy, a limited nuclear first strike.
Can I see a raise of hands?
They were firing 60,000 (not 600,000) at their peak, but not anymore:Fuck you're an idiot.
Russia is going to crush those poor bastards.
They've already blown through most all of the munitions NATO can afford to spare and Russia is literally gaining weight and just getting started. They've got 700k new soldiers, they're firing 600,000 artillery rounds a day and are producing them just as fast.
Stop the fairytale cunt ass bullshit already
This isn't about ego.
We should all be trying to save what's left of the ukranian people and stop playing games with their lives.
www.forbes.com
They were firing 60,000 (not 600,000) at their peak, but not anymore:
![]()
From Strength To Vulnerability: The Decline Of Russian Artillery In The Ukraine War
The lack of training and experience, particularly by Russian officers, has led to the overuse of artillery. The Ukrainians have successfully exploited this issue, turning what should be a large Russian strength into one of their largest vulnerabilities.www.forbes.com
And we know from WWI that with this style of war (with artillery, trenches, bunkers, people hiding/firing from brick buildings) it doesn't result in one side crushing the other. They fired a lot more rounds then and gained inches. Until Russia gets air superiority, or a way to defend their tanks from these anti-tank missiles, it will be a symmetrical war as General Bakshi of India says. Crushing is just some Russian fantasy.

Yeah, Putin says exactly why he started it in his essay: that they've historically been one pan-Slavic state and the only thing keeping them apart is the West, he's trying to right that wrong and you don't want to hear it or read it you want to shift all the blame onto your nemesis Biden.This is horrible atrocious, violent war here. Propagated by rich and powerful people for profit and empirical aspirations.
Well yeah, if Putin can't have it he's going to try to destroy it, turn it into a rump state, a welfare state of the EU. The last thing he wants is a Westernized democratic Ukraine to be successful. His people might want that for Russia and that's the end for him. But the West has a lot of resources to help Ukraine rebuild and we're not forcing them to fight. Kiev and Kharkiv and Dnipro etc are vibrant cities, not rubblized.thier country has been pounded into rubble already.
It will end, but only when both sides are ready to stop fighting. One year is way too soon for a war where there's this kind of animosity to end. There would be riots in Kiev. With a Russian offensive already started, 40 countries sending aid, tanks coming from Poland/Germany/UK, $30 billion from congress yet to be spent (that most American support), it's not like Biden could snap his fingers and end it.In the end, this will be a compromised peace one way or the other.
Joe Biden would like to spend every Ukrainian life and American dollar he can to enrich his handlers, but the end is near either way.
People have been saying that for a year despite what's happened in Kiev, Kharkiv, and Kherson. The difference between WWI and WWII was tanks and bombers. Now we have helicopters and cruise missiles. But Russia's tanks and airplanes have been taken out of the fight by modern anti-tank and anti-aircraft technology. Except for drones, satellites, and cruise missiles they have gone back to WWI, and artillery alone is not enough to "smash" a country. This isn't like US vs Afghanistan or US vs Iraq where you pound with heavy bombers for weeks, millions of tons of bombs, then come in with tanks and apache gunships.Ukraine is getting smashed.
I think it's been the West's position that it's not our place to tell Ukraine when to stop fighting. We can't make that decision for them. Maybe if they were the invaders, but they are not. Maybe if it comes to the point where we can't help them anymore, but we can. For us to say "hey we have moral qualms about the casualties you defending yourself is causing so you should just stop and get defeated or make a peace settlement you don't want"... you realize how ridiculous that sounds?
caitlinjohnstone.com
Or "hey Biden actually started this all with a coup and a bribe (neither of which we have proof of)
and Russia's really justified in invading to teach Biden a lesson and take down the US military industrial complex's evil plans to start a war, so we don't want you to fight, just become Russia or give Putin what he wants" that would come from someone with little understanding of the situation and mental illness, and be brushed aside.

Yet again, this is something you're grossly misinformed on. But you only want information that suits your narrative that Biden has to go. Here's Victoria Nuland talking about it:For fucks sake Nuland and US intelligence themselves don't deny thier role in the coup. They're proud of it.
What on Earth makes you think Ukraine wants to give up and Washington won't let them? All evidence is to the contrary. They've been attacked, they're angry, and you say we boss other countries around too much. They're the ones who have been invaded, they're the ones that will lose territory or their country, they're the ones losing their lives. Who are we to tell them to stop defending themselves and just give Putin the aggressor what he wants?Washington is completely driving Ukrainian government decisions at this point and Washington will decide when Ukranians stop dying
Yet again, this is something you're grossly misinformed on. But you only want information that suits your narrative that Biden has to go. Here's Victoria Nuland talking about it:
View: https://youtu.be/k9seyqBQ-P4?t=2535
She says because Yanukovych had done something expected to upset the Ukrainian people that the protests were spontaneous, there was turmoil in the government, and as an American diplomat and Assistant Secretary of State for Europe she was trying to help broker deals that would make everybody happy.
But Russia was pressuring Yanukovych to crack down on the protesters and not make deals.
Then he fled and they tried to help Ukraine (at their request) with an interim government until they could have an election. I'd be proud of that too.
What on Earth makes you think Ukraine wants to give up and Washington won't let them?
caitlinjohnstone.com
All evidence is to the contrary.
caitlinjohnstone.com
LmfaoThey've been attacked, they're angry, and you say we boss other countries around too much. They're the ones who have been invaded, they're the ones that will lose territory or their country, they're the ones losing their lives. Who are we to tell them to stop defending themselves and just give Putin the aggressor what he wants?
And just so your nemesis Joe Biden maybe doesn't get re-elected? You don't care about the Ukrainians either, and since when have the Ukrainians cared about Americans? For you it's all about if Ukraine is successful Biden is successful and you can't have that. So, as political hack and sore loser, you make this bleeding heart story about how there's too many deaths and Biden is the cause. It's ridiculous.
Biden didn't invade, and Biden didn't do a Jedi mind trick on Putin. And Putin isn't some big dumb bear who can't help himself but attack when angry, if Ukraine still had their 1,200 nukes there would be no invasion. What happens in Ukraine is none of Putin's business - it's not his country.
Well for all we know there are aliens on Earth, right? But until you have evidence it's just your hunch. Don't act like it's fact. You said Victoria Nuland doesn't even deny it, well I just showed you her denying it.Lmfao.
What a stupid bitch you really are.
"Washington didn't orchestrate a coup, they simply funded and organized an insurrection that started on it own and led to a coup" - @hometeam
There would be no civil war if Russia didn't recruit and arm those militias.So after instigating a coup that triggered a civil war. We should just keep it going as long as they're willing to keep dying?
Caitlin Johnstone? Her site says "some people think I’ve written for RT, but in reality RT is just one of the many outlets who’ve occasionally chosen on their own to republish my work"Obviously you're lying.... again
![]()
More Evidence That The West Sabotaged Peace In Ukraine
Listen to a reading of this article: ❖ Days after the war in Ukraine began it was reported by The New York Times that “President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine has asked the Israeli prime mini…caitlinjohnstone.com
caitlinjohnstone.com
news.gallup.com
