i see what you're trying to say, and here's a counterpoint. im honestly not interested in whether new users have "thick skin" or whatever, if they've got experiences and even better blood tests/labmax, etc then i want to see it. my issue is there seems to be this clique of WKM/AM and even some active members that actively and harshly attack anybody who does not share their viewpoints. it's fine to have a debate, bring some facts to the table. for example, in this thread, naps has actually provided links to blood work vs the opposition is screaming "you suck, you suck". now what's a stronger argument? by stifling opinions and scaring users/contributors off, you're potentially losing a lot of valuable data and input