The Lobster International, US and EU Domestic HGH, PEPTIDES and Turkish Pharmacy

So much cum from all the ridding in this damn thread… I can hardly scroll… where my BETAAAA’s at??? Same shit Millard was talking about in regard to defending sources….
There’s defending sources, then there’s riding their asses like a pony pretending to know their operation better than the source does. Once a source attracts the attention of these two the thread goes to shit. It’s the messenger that’s the problem, not the message.
 
There’s defending sources, then there’s riding their asses like a pony pretending to know their operation better than the source does. Once a source attracts the attention of these two the thread goes to shit. It’s the messenger that’s the problem, not the message.
Pony…. Umm not sure…. Looks more like stallion ridding…
 
There’s defending sources, then there’s riding their asses like a pony pretending to know their operation better than the source does. Once a source attracts the attention of these two the thread goes to shit. It’s the messenger that’s the problem, not the message.
Agreed

Can't let logical thinking go out the window. We aren't defending @TheLobster because we want cheap prices or to suck him off.

Being to extreme on either end is ridiculous. We are discussing getting testing done. My point of it was to prove if degradation was really an issue but now we are getting pushback from the loser who makes it sound like a certainty.


As I said, he could be right but why the hell arent people letting test results speak for themselves?

I
 
I'm in (again). No draft from the Lobster yet.

Release vacuum in lyo hgh vials with air and test at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12 months at x temp? Define.

Also need to agree what we are testing for. Monomer loss? Total oligomers? Monomer percent of total mass by SEC?

See paper earlier. Answer was given for accelerated aging condition at 323 K = 50 deg C = 122 deg F.

Note: 25 deg C is 77 deg F ~ room temp

See also


Might as well get some useful data since the thread "went to shit". Let's see who is down.
 
Last edited:
122 deg F (50 deg C)


See Fig. 4 (again).

Room temp results should be much better. Rule of 10 deg C tells us that chemical reaction rate should be 2x higher with every 10 deg C of increased temp for activation energy of 50 kJ/mol (yes it is a shortcut approximation). So the difference between 25 deg C vs 50 deg may be dramatic.

Lyophilized samples were incubated for 16 weeks at 323 K. At each time point (immediately after lyophilization, and after 1, 4, 9 and 16 weeks), after rehydration of samples with water rhGH aggregation, deamidation and oxidation levels were measured by size exclusion chromatography (SEC), ion exchange chromatography (IEC) and reverse phase chromatography (RP), respectively.8 At least triplicate measurements were carried out to determine the quantities of remaining of monomer/native protein at each time point.

Fig. 4 shows the importance of excipient package. Kudos to Lobster for having one even if he won't share the exact details including glycine content.
 
Last edited:
Or here's a shortcut method that has limitations:


Tabular format


Sincerely,
not an expert
 
My friend who struggles to understand, I’ve said multiple times that there isn’t even the slightest air inside non vacuum vials.
Then what is in the non-vacuum vials?

I'm browsing around, trying to decide who do buy ~600 IU from. Not a huge amount, I know, so I don't think I'm some big spender or anything, but just pointing out I'm asking this as a potential customer and not just trolling.

But this comment just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. I can understand why there isn't air inside of a vacuum vial - because, you know, it's a vacuum. But what is there instead of a vacuum if it isn't air? Are you pumping argon gas in there for some reason? If it will maintain a seal, why didn't it get vacuumed?
 
Then what is in the non-vacuum vials?

I'm browsing around, trying to decide who do buy ~600 IU from. Not a huge amount, I know, so I don't think I'm some big spender or anything, but just pointing out I'm asking this as a potential customer and not just trolling.

But this comment just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. I can understand why there isn't air inside of a vacuum vial - because, you know, it's a vacuum. But what is there instead of a vacuum if it isn't air? Are you pumping argon gas in there for some reason? If it will maintain a seal, why didn't it get vacuumed?
Source stated the issue was repaired.


Pharma uses inert gas backfill. I haven't read here that this source does. Hence if vial doesn't have vacuum then it's air.
 
My man casually flexing a Ludwig Boltzmann refence.
View attachment 318436



On a side note, reading @Ghoul's post (The Lobster International, US and EU Domestic HGH, PEPTIDES and Turkish Pharmacy), where they were respectfully and commendably attempting to extend the proverbial olive branch and come to a mutual understanding, and then reading the source's bitter response, is rather disappointing. Put the ego and defensiveness aside, display some character and maturity, and engage with people as if they were, ya know, people. Things can be taken out of contex and provoke emotional, aggressive reactions (especially through a text medium), we've all been there, but I cannot fathom a justifiable reason why anyone would outright reject another's good-faith gesture to dissolve a minor quarrel, and instead would choose to continue with insults and mockery. I don't know, perhaps the flaw is on my end, and my meager brain lacks the capacity to understand.

My friend, dragging this issue out and exaggerating it this much without a clear result shows that they have a bias against me and are trying to act like know it alls. Their attempt to justify themselves with information they read online and their deliberate effort to prolong this discussion was completely unnecessary.

The HGH batches I produce are always between 2,000 and 5,000 vials. I have repeatedly stated that there is no more non-vacuum HGH, yet they kept pushing the topic on purpose.

Now, for the last time, I want to make this CLEAR AND FINAL:

There is no more non-vacuum HGH. The small amount that existed is gone. Those who received non-vacuum HGH were not harmed I know this for a fact. The test results will be published within two weeks.

Making assumptions and exaggerating the issue based on what they read online without ever holding a Lobster HGH vial or testing one is nothing but a deliberate attack against me.

The greatest difference between ignorance and wisdom is that the wise know what they do not know. Socrates

Your opinion is not as valuable as my knowledge. Because your opinion was formed without knowing anything.Harlan Ellison
 
they have a bias against me
As I have stated I have zero bias against you. If/when I switch to UG HGH I'd like to be a customer.

Yet when a member posts he is concerned with his vial pressure I would hope you would avoid pissing on his back and tell him it's raining.

I wish you the best.
 
I'm in (again). No draft from the Lobster yet.

Release vacuum in lyo hgh vials with air and test at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12 months at x temp? Define.

Also need to agree what we are testing for. Monomer loss? Total oligomers? Monomer percent of total mass by SEC?

See paper earlier. Answer was given for accelerated aging condition at 323 K = 50 deg C = 122 deg F.

Note: 25 deg C is 77 deg F ~ room temp

See also


Might as well get some useful data since the thread "went to shit". Let's see who is down.


This looks like version where you're spending other people's money. That's always fun.

How would you do it if you were paying for it by yourself, today?
 
This looks like version where you're spending other people's money. That's always fun.

How would you do it if you were paying for it by yourself, today?
Feel free to revise/edit as you see fit. I welcome your comments and any comments.

Feel free to tell us how you'd do it on your dime vs a mix of your money and member money. Btw, I'm not asking you for a dime.

Based on the agreed scope and number of members willing to chip in we should be able to get some data even if it is just monomer loss over a few time points.

Or members can use the shortcut method I provided above to give them some information if they don't want to spend any money (free of charge to them). A small gift to MESO science club.

Awfully quiet in here when the dirty details come up. I find you interesting as a scientist. Spaceman brings up testing: I draft an experimental outline. You offer some snark (not the first time lol).

How about your feedback on the proposal along with whether you are in or out? Get out that red pen Dr.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top