Labmax test results

Flenser so does labmax have a mast e test ready for sale? I emailed them two days ago asking when it would be ready and have not herd back.
 
Flenser so does labmax have a mast e test ready for sale? I emailed them two days ago asking when it would be ready and have not herd back.

No, he was going to develop one from the legit samples I sent him :rolleyes:

Mast e isn't an official pharmaceutical. he can't purchase a know sample (standard) from anyone but underground labs. That's proven to be challenging.
 
No, he was going to develop one from the legit samples I sent him :rolleyes:

Mast e isn't an official pharmaceutical. he can't purchase a know sample (standard) from anyone but underground labs. That's proven to be challenging.
Yeah that's what I though and why mast p being pasted off as mast e doesn't surprise me, mast e is a ugl thing. I am also not surprised by all the prop issues lets face it, only a few raw manufacturers down to a few distributors that probably cut it just like any street drug then a simple fact there are probably a FEW large brewers making it then selling it in jugs and lots of guys bottling it slapping a label on it and claiming they brewed it.
 
First I have to ask was this from the vials that I suspected to have been mast p and not Mast E due to a labeling error? If so then we only confirmed what I suspected. And this was isolated to 2 individuals and happend 3 months ago.

As far as deca being present only thing I could think is if the filter previously had deca filtered then had mast filters. AS of late I do a rinse so this can never happen.

Who has a labmax kit right now? I will next day Mast E to you and compensate you for the test.



 
Last edited:
First I have to ask was this from the vials that I suspected to have been mast p and not Mast E due to a labeling error? If so then we only confirmed what I suspected. And this was isolated to 2 individuals and happend 3 months ago.

As far as deca being present only thing I could think is if the filter previously had deca filtered then had mast filters. AS of late I do a rinse so this can never happen.

Who has a labmax kit right now? I will next day Mast E to you and compensate you for the test.

Astro, the sample he tested was NOT from the labeling error vials. It was from the ones you sent as a replacement. There was also not enough mast p in the samples to do much aas wise. It was essentially bunk gear with a little mast p and a little deca and... something else.

If that's what you're selling as mast p, you have an even bigger problem. It's not, though, because I tested your mast p, and it's legit. Your mast e raws are bunk.
 
Damn I miss you oxide!! All legit gear. My buddy got locked up a few years ago with a shit load of oxide. The Feds tested it and it all came back legit and overdosed by like 3%, Even tren hex. Best way to get your gear tested. Catch a federal case!!! Lolllll
 
Excuse me? Scammer? I think scammers intentionally do the acts. If I were anywhere near a scammer I would not have a limitation on who orders from me.
That's an awfully bold statement you make with zero proof. I dont fuck around with peoples health and ever misslable compounds so you have alot of nerve saying scammer.


As stated and I guarantee that it would have been trace amounts due to filtering one compound after the other. I now perform a rinse prior to filtering so this can never happen.

Are there purity levels or anything that shows active mg?

The two raws are quite distinguishable so i would notice at least I believe in would notice the two mixed together


Code:

Astro Mast E is not only bunk but contaminated?? Geez bummer. Another scammer
 
Excuse me? Scammer? I think scammers intentionally do the acts. If I were anywhere near a scammer I would not have a limitation on who orders from me.
That's an awfully bold statement you make with zero proof. I dont fuck around with peoples health and ever misslable compounds so you have alot of nerve saying scammer.


As stated and I guarantee that it would have been trace amounts due to filtering one compound after the other. I now perform a rinse prior to filtering so this can never happen.

Are there purity levels or anything that shows active mg?

The two raws are quite distinguishable so i would notice at least I believe in would notice the two mixed together


Code:

I don't think you're a scammer. Karl might, but I don't :D j/k

On the mast e raws, it makes sense you would recognize themmixed together if that's all that was there. But labmax said there was very little of either present in the sample.

Remember that he ran a GC/MS test, not a labmax test. The results are definitive, not subjective like the labmax tests. I do agree with you it's easy to interpret a labmax test wrong, but this was not the case with your mast e.
 
I agree, Astro isn't scamming, but his Mast E source needs to be fixed. The tests show his other gear is legit, though.

Mast E in general is just really hard to find.
 
a scammer takes your money and runs...
now if Astro's supplier sends him some bad Mast E and he in turn sells it to you,
that isn't directly Astro's fault and should be allowed the chance to correct this starting from the original source/supplier.
 
a scammer takes your money and runs...

now if Astro's supplier sends him some bad Mast E and he in turn sells it to you,

that isn't directly Astro's fault and should be allowed the chance to correct this starting from the original source/supplier.


Wrong.. He took the money he's responsible, period..

I can appreciate you probably have an order pending but I can promise you Astro can address this himself..
 
Send me copys of the Mass Spec testing. Pm me and I'll give you further details.

Remember that the test said there were trace amounts now anyone who purchased Mast E from me can attest to the severity of it crashing. A product void of Hormone or trace amounts would not crash how my mast did. Trace amounts with the amount of BA/BB added it would never fall from suspension being that it is saturated with carrier oil/sovent

I don't think you're a scammer. Karl might, but I don't :D j/k

On the mast e raws, it makes sense you would recognize themmixed together if that's all that was there. But labmax said there was very little of either present in the sample.

Remember that he ran a GC/MS test, not a labmax test. The results are definitive, not subjective like the labmax tests. I do agree with you it's easy to interpret a labmax test wrong, but this was not the case with your mast e.
 
Last edited:
Send me copys of the Mass Spec testing. Pm me and I'll give you further details.

Remember that the test said there were trace amounts now anyone who purchased Mast E from me can attest to the severity of it crashing. A product void of Hormone or trace amounts would not crash how my mast did. Trace amounts with the amount of BA/BB added it would never fall from suspension being that it is saturated with carrier oil/sovent

This was an informal test, not a paid test. There are no mass spec reports other than the email I got from labmax. I'm not a lawyer and neither are you. You can choose to accept the results, or not.

You aren't going to prove anything new by analyzing my words. I posted all of labmax's words, though, and if you read them you will see he didn't say trace amounts. That was me paraphrasing.
 
Back
Top