Yep I've seen it before. First batch is good and the rest is shit. Might as well tryProblem would be your opinion would be worthless if the source knows ahead of time you are reviewing his gear
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep I've seen it before. First batch is good and the rest is shit. Might as well tryProblem would be your opinion would be worthless if the source knows ahead of time you are reviewing his gear
Ok, I missed the part about others telling you not to talk about where your sourcing... I can see you source on Reddit and you're new there too. It still doesn't change the fact that with out any kind of testing on your product, there is no way to tell if what is written on the label, matches what is inside the vial. Bloods will help, for the current batch of raws you used to brew.Hey, thanks for the response. I have sales coming from another community, I've been told earlier in the thread to not mention it as it's reviews are useless here on this community. That being said, I do have several reviews and a blood test on that community.
I feel as if I have done everything asked of me thus far. I was asked that at a minimum labmax my products, which I now have. I was asked to analytically test product for purity and substance, which I am not working on. I was asked to stop selling until I could prove what I am claiming to sell is what it is, which I have as well. Between the time of my first introduction and my labmax results, I did not bump the thread at all- because no one commented. I do not think it is out of line for me to respond to comments/questions/replies. These are not intention bumps, they are simply due respect in answering all those that have taken time to respond.
Edit: In regards to asking people to come here and post reviews/feedback, it is my policy to never push customers to write reviews. If they are impressed with the quality of product and service, then they will do it themselves. I will never ask or push a customer to write a review for me, that to me is not a genuine review.
Thanks for your feedback.
OH but you can CHANGE THAT POST, JUST ASK FOR HELP to get your words corrected.
24k would you be willing to let someone try your gear? Hear me out, I'm on a low dose of test e nothing else. I could perhaps try yours. If your gear is good I'll give my honest opinion and If it sucks I'm out what a hundred bucks?
Yep I've seen it before. First batch is good and the rest is shit. Might as well try
Ok, I missed the part about others telling you not to talk about where your sourcing... I can see you source on Reddit and you're new there too. It still doesn't change the fact that with out any kind of testing on your product, there is no way to tell if what is written on the label, matches what is inside the vial. Bloods will help, for the current batch of raws you used to brew.
However, when the next batch of raws comes through and you brew again, what says that they are the same concetration as the previous? Then everyone has to wait for someone to play guinea pig again and let's face it, few sources only order raws once every few months I'm guessing... Especially with the way your business could pick up if people here bought from here. I guarantee that you would have the greatest success testing every batch and being patient each round of raws.
I do think it's good you're here to answer questions about your product and customer service, but I would highly suggest you stick to that. Sorry for bumping this thread again everyone!
Your obviously a very intelligent human.if you can brew top notch gear at such a great price.I'm sure you can figure out how to get your post altered.. Just saying.someone with the ability to run his own lab don't need a dumb wiseass like me to show him the way around a forum that puts all the answers in front of your face.The OPTIONS are endlessAh, I didn't know that, thanks for that information. Could you direct me on how to do this? I would like to change the introduction post by taking the sales element out of it. Thanks for your help.
WHY WOULD A SOURCE perchance large quantities of RAWS knowing that batch may be underdosed. Rite so they get 1sack at a time.we test they start over.I love being the test case subject.oh but they gonna throw in extras next time ahhhhbhhOk, I missed the part about others telling you not to talk about where your sourcing... I can see you source on Reddit and you're new there too. It still doesn't change the fact that with out any kind of testing on your product, there is no way to tell if what is written on the label, matches what is inside the vial. Bloods will help, for the current batch of raws you used to brew.
However, when the next batch of raws comes through and you brew again, what says that they are the same concetration as the previous? Then everyone has to wait for someone to play guinea pig again and let's face it, few sources only order raws once every few months I'm guessing... Especially with the way your business could pick up if people here bought from here. I guarantee that you would have the greatest success testing every batch and being patient each round of raws.
I do think it's good you're here to answer questions about your product and customer service, but I would highly suggest you stick to that. Sorry for bumping this thread again everyone!
24k would you be willing to let someone try your gear? Hear me out, I'm on a low dose of test e nothing else. I could perhaps try yours. If your gear is good I'll give my honest opinion and If it sucks I'm out what a hundred bucks?
And I'm not new I've tried astro/Roxi/biologic when they all first started.
Yep I've seen it before. First batch is good and the rest is shit. Might as well try
Your obviously a very intelligent human.if you can brew top notch gear at such a great price.I'm sure you can figure out how to get your post altered.. Just saying.someone with the ability to run his own lab don't need a dumb wiseass like me to show him the way around a forum that puts all the answers in front of your face.The OPTIONS are endless
WHY WOULD A SOURCE perchance large quantities of RAWS knowing that batch may be underdosed. Rite so they get 1sack at a time.we test they start over.I love being the test case subject.oh but they gonna throw in extras next time ahhhhbhh
These are recent 24k customer lab tests that were posted by 24K on reddit. Both labs show the test is underdosed, customer 1 especially. Results like these are what happens when sources don't test their raws.
http://www.reddit.com/r/Steroidsour...e_24k_pharma_updates_schedule_labmax_testing/
Customer 1:
[933 mg/wk - TT = 3956.6 ng/dL]
- Late 30s male
- 240s BW
- 6'2"
- Has run test only cycles in his early 20s
- Week 9 of 400 mg Test C E3D
- Does not use AI
- Claims pins 6am Wed, claimed bloods taken 1pm Fri
- Blood work timing
- Blood work test/E2
Customer 2:
[583 mg/wk - TT = 3559.1 ng/dL]
- 25YO male
- 170 BW
- 5'6"
- First cycle
- Week 6 or 7 of 250 mg E3D
- 0.5 mg Arimidex EOD from Research Supply company
- Claims took test day after last injection
- Blood work timing
- Blood work test/E2
A source hypothesizing great. I would like to see a source who has a clue. I can confidently extrapolate this...... Basically all this once again shows you are no different then the others. Nothing special here same old raw source connect as everybody else.Hey, thanks for your feedback. First just wanted to acknowledge that I realize source provided blood work means little but I still wanted to provide some data points.
Also wanted to clear up some confusion that was on me. The injections are actually 2x/week, I usually suggestion every 3.5 days to customers so it becomes twice a week injections. I am just not used to writing E3.5D, it looks a bit strange. Not sure if this affects anything, but just wanted to clarify that.
I am still in the process of figuring out what the results mean and would love some detailed feedback from the community. I am eagerly awaiting blood results from the online community, because I get a sense that the online community is more diligent about dosing protocol, AI use, and AAS research. For example, I have some local customers who routinely skip doses without front or backloading for the week if they get sick or have a business trip.
Unfortunately, there is no way I can confidently extrapolate purity from this data, as there are just too many factors. From what I've read in the testing session, this community would like to see 7/8-10x the levels. The only observation I can make right now is that it would seem as if testosterone levels vary greatly from individual to individual. I would hypothesize that the individual with the larger body mass has lower proportional dosage:test levels than the individual with the lower body mass. I would appreciate any input.
24k, what was or is your other handle here?Hey, thanks for your feedback. First just wanted to acknowledge that I realize source provided blood work means little but I still wanted to provide some data points.
Also wanted to clear up some confusion that was on me. The injections are actually 2x/week, I usually suggestion every 3.5 days to customers so it becomes twice a week injections. I am just not used to writing E3.5D, it looks a bit strange. Not sure if this affects anything, but just wanted to clarify that.
I am still in the process of figuring out what the results mean and would love some detailed feedback from the community. I am eagerly awaiting blood results from the online community, because I get a sense that the online community is more diligent about dosing protocol, AI use, and AAS research. For example, I have some local customers who routinely skip doses without front or backloading for the week if they get sick or have a business trip.
Unfortunately, there is no way I can confidently extrapolate purity from this data, as there are just too many factors. From what I've read in the testing session, this community would like to see 7/8-10x the levels. The only observation I can make right now is that it would seem as if testosterone levels vary greatly from individual to individual. I would hypothesize that the individual with the larger body mass has lower proportional dosage:test levels than the individual with the lower body mass. I would appreciate any input.
A source hypothesizing great. I would like to see a source who has a clue. I can confidently extrapolate this...... Basically all this once again shows you are no different then the others. Nothing special here same old raw source connect as everybody else.
This need to be answered.What's your SOP when it comes to protecting the member's personal information ?
What's your SOP when it comes to protecting the member's personal information ?