Mdrock98
Well-known Member
Bruh. LmaoOoooh. This thread is going to be interesting today. Post up the email exchange at the very least.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bruh. LmaoOoooh. This thread is going to be interesting today. Post up the email exchange at the very least.
I understand your concern on the vetting process. I really do wish I was able to replicate meso's vetting onto a new board, but its just damn near impossible, which is what makes meso #1 forums for roids, its unique approach to allowing sources in. Anyone's allowed in, but be prepared for some SEAL-type hazing.Ok Dragon. You’ve already been vetted here. You’re known.
It’s the other sources on Brewly that need to be held accountable the same exact way you are.
That’s the complaint here. Brewly is bypassing the way MESO members prefer to question their sources. Unknown source/no testing/no accountability. What is Brewly bringing?
Security? Right. But for personal use orders, email is plenty secure.
So really, everyone here would be SOLD on convenience. The ability to order from multiple vendors in one transaction without having to pay multiple shipping fees or Bitcoin transaction fees. But only if those vendors are held accountable and have testing results.
All that seems very reasonable. Yet your @Brewly partner flips the fuck out. And please don’t say “eventually, these things take time”. Make it happen and come back in 3 months then.
Pay @Brewly to do the computer nerd work behind the scenes in some room with no windows but you def don’t want him being the rep here. Horrible.
So you finally address the issue three and a half weeks later.I understand your concern on the vetting process. I really do wish I was able to replicate meso's vetting onto a new board, but its just damn near impossible, which is what makes meso #1 forums for roids, its unique approach to allowing sources in. Anyone's allowed in, but be prepared for some SEAL-type hazing.
I don't wanna copy, so I just went with whats tried and true. If I was able to make some democratic, voting system, I would, but that also requires members, which currently, we don't have much. Its a startup. I can promise you things will change in the future 100%, and Brewly will be a better site everyday, but for now, we're trying to gather ideas, have exposure, and see where it takes us. Its a project of mine I'd love to blossom, and I'm sure it will.
But as you said, yes, convenience is one of the big factors that we try to promote Brewly with. I only accept sources with purity testing. What is biased of me is I also do ask where they get their raws, but its not that I, as DO, care. I care as Brewly to see who they are, what reputation they have before them, and if I can trust a source using (insert chino here) raws.
Sorry about brewly's behavior. Some people aren't good with getting hazed, forgive him and go easy on him. Let me have the hard questions.
I still want you in my thread mf
i still feel like your it guy is doing a shit job at being the face of brewly
Was there something you specifically wanted addressed? Im not sure what you’re referring to papiSo you finally address the issue three and a half weeks later.
Was there something you specifically wanted addressed? Im not sure what you’re referring to papi
I was referring the the post i quoted.Was there something you specifically wanted addressed? Im not sure what you’re referring to papi
Our screening requirements are, and without too much detail, plain and simple;I was referring the the post i quoted.
But since you asked, I'm still waiting for you to answer my questions about your vetting process you keep seeming to avoid.
Vendors and buyers all in one spot. I agree with whoever said this seems like a LEO set up. No thanks.
Chill out, officer !
Sure, halve the fee right after I throw my order in.Small update for the boys:
Labs page is in, email has been sent out. 3 vendors have lab pics up. Gonna see if the vendors that still haven't can either speed it up or give me access to their accounts to upload pics myself.
Have culled a couple more vendors and have removed Apexa from top vendor list as well as WFO (out of stock for +2 weeks). Apexa is having his lineup tested with Jano right now, will take further action based on that.
Network fee has been halved. You pay approximately $1 extra for every $100. This fee is used to cover discrepancies that sometimes occur between different wallets as well as bitcoin miner fees. The impact of which was initially overestimated, hence the new downward adjustment.
Next on the list is Vendor reviews (we already have product reviews with the ability to attach bloodwork).
Sure, halve the fee right after I throw my order in.
Small update for the boys:
Labs page is in, email has been sent out. 3 vendors have lab pics up. Gonna see if the vendors that still haven't can either speed it up or give me access to their accounts to upload pics myself.
Have culled a couple more vendors and have removed Apexa from top vendor list as well as WFO (out of stock for +2 weeks). Apexa is having his lineup tested with Jano right now, will take further action based on that.
Network fee has been halved. You pay approximately $1 extra for every $100. This fee is used to cover discrepancies that sometimes occur between different wallets as well as bitcoin miner fees. The impact of which was initially overestimated, hence the new downward adjustment.
Next on the list is Vendor reviews (we already have product reviews with the ability to attach bloodwork).
Received. TyBet. Give me a bitcoin addy and I'll send you the $2 dollars.
Small update for the boys:
Labs page is in, email has been sent out. 3 vendors have lab pics up. Gonna see if the vendors that still haven't can either speed it up or give me access to their accounts to upload pics myself.
Have culled a couple more vendors and have removed Apexa from top vendor list as well as WFO (out of stock for +2 weeks). Apexa is having his lineup tested with Jano right now, will take further action based on that.
Network fee has been halved. You pay approximately $1 extra for every $100. This fee is used to cover discrepancies that sometimes occur between different wallets as well as bitcoin miner fees. The impact of which was initially overestimated, hence the new downward adjustment.
Next on the list is Vendor reviews (we already have product reviews with the ability to attach bloodwork).
So how did Apexa's product get into Jano's hands? Anonymously? Or was it sent directly from Apexa? If it was sent direct from Apexa then those results mean absolute dog crap to anyone with a brain.
Here's what the Apexa situation means. It means I'm not banning a vendor after a single complaint. It also means I can't reimburse people that haven't bought on the website.
You're freaking out over one customer report that came back a little off. I'm not going to out-right ban him until there's more information. We need to do our due-dilligence.
He hasn't had any orders on Brewly yet, and there was one report on SST that was addressed. It's just not enough information for me to outright ban someone.
If anyone buys from Apexa on Brewly and comes back with shitty testing, I'll reimburse them if Apexa can't make it right (though I'm sure he would).
I'd seen all that but I'd rank the legitimacy of gear sent directly from a vendor to the tester even lower on the ladder of trust worthy than a anonymous user sending it in.If you read a few pages back you’ll see that from Brewly's stand point they mean nothing if they come from a member either. Brewly stated it was just one "complaint" from one individual so he didn’t see the need to take it seriously. It actually wasn't a "complaint". It was poor testing results. One of which wasn't even the product it was claimed to be on the label. I'm sure Brewly will come in claiming this is a lie. See for yourself below...
IMO this should be the nail in the coffin. He’s over looking a set of bad test results to fill his pockets and down playing them as if they don’t matter. Wonder which results he will deem to see fit to accept.
If you read a few pages back you’ll see that from Brewly's stand point they mean nothing if they come from a member either. Brewly stated it was just one "complaint" from one individual so he didn’t see the need to take it seriously. It actually wasn't a "complaint". It was poor testing results. One of which wasn't even the product it was claimed to be on the label. I'm sure Brewly will come in claiming this is a lie. See for yourself below...
IMO this should be the nail in the coffin. He’s over looking a set of bad test results to fill his pockets and down playing them as if they don’t matter. Wonder which results he will deem to see fit to accept.