I’ll take that to the chin and agree I’m wrong saying the “rep edited the report”. That still doesn’t nullify the point of my original response, or suffice a response like that from you, explaining why that report was an issue. The fact that a report on their products was edited and even posted, and was proven to be edited, was a big cause for concern, who knows what other products could have been not properly dosed. The owner rectified the issue, and a big props to him for it, he handled it as best we could ask. I’m not here trying to cause drama or bullshit with a UGL I like, or you as a member man just want to make that clear.