Human_backhoe
Member
Oh yeah it is.
I'm all for harm reduction, but I'm convinced that some people around here get off on the drama and power tripping more than they enjoy helping people avoid buying motor oil.
Vetting has become more focused on ego-stroking and "street cred" than harm prevention. It's sad to see.
I agree to a point! Vetting sources is necessary. All the infighting is not.
That being said. From MY point of view. Sources should be given no quarter! At the end of the day a drug dealer is a drug dealer. I myself have injected stuff gotten here on Meso that was no good and caused pain and possible physical harm. I purchase for others in my family as well my wife cycles too. I want all lies rooted out. I'm my books a lie is a lie. When push comes to shove I want sources that will make it right, not play the blame game! Only admitting fault when back into a corner! If a drug dealer is willing to lie about the small things I have no doubt that if something goes legitimately wrong they will attempt to bullshit their way out of it.
To a lesser extent I understand some of the anger towards members who will stick up for a source caught being a piece of shit. What needs to be understood in that is, everyone has a different line in the sand when it comes to acceptable behavior of a drug dealer. My threshold is real fucking low lol. That being said my experiences are different than some. Some understanding should go to members though. Not all people who like a source are shills.