"Conservative values" as practiced by the Bush administration means a big government, activist Republican party.jbiggs said:Conservative values play a huge role as well and in that area Kerry is sunk.
Now, how is that being a true conservative?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Conservative values" as practiced by the Bush administration means a big government, activist Republican party.jbiggs said:Conservative values play a huge role as well and in that area Kerry is sunk.
administrator said:"Conservative values" as practiced by the Bush administration means a big government, activist Republican party.
Now, how is that being a true conservative?
administrator said:"Conservative values" as practiced by the Bush administration means a big government, activist Republican party.
Now, how is that being a true conservative?
Kayz said:But is Kerry's plan any better??? I mean his plan is tax the rich and give to the poor. He is robin hood of the modern era.
This is what is wrong with the democratic party.....their policies do not encourage hard work and drive within the work force...they are just gonna "give everything to those less fortunate because we failed them in society by letting them fall thru the cracks".
In order for the democrats to keep their base, they must keep the uneducated and poor uneducated and poor. They have done a good job doing that in the past.
Yes, I acknowledge your definition of value. But you are wrong when you state that "values have nothing to do" with government size and activism. They don't necessarily have to be related and most often they should not be related. (No doubt, you can clearly see how liberal values result in activist and expanded government. Why can't you see the connection here?)jbiggs said:This statement alone shows you don't understand Conservative values. Values have nothing to do with the size of government or an activist party. Values are what you stand for in your heart.
Oh come on now!?! AFter I went on and on about most people's inability to discuss conservative policy without using Kerry as a scapegoat to change the subject, you throw this bullshit back at me?Kayz said:But is Kerry's plan any better... This is what is wrong with the democratic party...
Of course there is. How convenient. Why should anyone be upset at the liberal spending of the Republican controlled Congress and Bush administration? After all, they have good conservative values. Actions don't matter, it's what you feel "in your hearts" that's important.jbiggs said:There is more to being conservative than fiscal restraint.
I think this will be a huge issue within the Republican party. While Bush's approach to the war on terrorism maybe still be strongly debated, I think internal trends suggest that conservatives do not feel Bush has handled the war in Iraq well. Rather than debate this, I just want to suggest that this will be one issue that will be subject heated discussion within the the Republican party - not so much now, as they have to get re-elected, but afterwards (assuming Bush wins the election). Then they will be free to express their disapproval and dissent. Prediction on my part.Kayz said:1) I fully agree with the war on terrorism in general and the war in Iraq. I think Bush is handling it very well.
Vote for your self-interest. Can't argue about doing what's best for your family. Overall, I think most people don't have a clue as to whether they are voting for their self-interest or against their self-interest; it's not general a straightforward proposition.Kayz said:2) I agree with the tax breaks as my family benefitted greatly from them.
It's inevitable. This free market position is historically consistent with the Republican party platform.Kayz said:3) I agree with the outsourcing of jobs in order for corporations to save money.
Does Bush's (alleged) plan to privatize Social Security "fix" Social Security?Kayz said:7) I agree with Bush that social security should be privatized for younger workers like myself. Social Secrity will be bankrupt in 10 years, so pumping more money into it the way Kerry proposes is just delaying the inevitable IMO. Fix it.
administrator said:Does Bush's (alleged) plan to privatize Social Security "fix" Social Security?
administrator said:Of course there is. How convenient. Why should anyone be upset at the liberal spending of the Republican controlled Congress and Bush administration? After all, they have good conservative values. Actions don't matter, it's what you feel "in your hearts" that's important.
and this...Kayz said:I'm a greedy, selfish piece of shit who only cares
about myself and my family....that is it.
is why I think that this...Kayz said:It all goes back to survival of
the fittest: those who are strong and able to provide for their families
will survive and procreate; those who are weak and cannot provide for their
own will die!!!!!
will not succeed and that the following will not happen...Kayz said:I think all welfare should be abolished.
Kayz said:People are good at heart and will take care of others.....IF they
able to do so at their leisure, not the governments.
administrator said:This...
and this...
is why I think that this...
will not succeed and that the following will not happen...
Kayz said:...so you are implying that I am not an inherently good person??? Wow, that is a bld statement considering you dont' know me or my motives for making those statements.
I don't speak for everyone administrator.....just myself. There are millions of people who will gladly give to charities to take care of others...just not me. I will take care of my family, friends, and myself.
I'm the first to admit that I'm pretty extreme in my views...but they are my views. And for you to fucking imply that I'm not a good person because of my opinions is highly offensive. But, I dont' care what you think, so fuck it.
jbiggs said:Is that a Flame?
jbiggs said:Him, sounded like a "personal attack" to me?
This is not at all what I'm doing. I hope this is as clear as day to everyone except you.esco said:i would do the same kayz .... btw-admin, in your responses you keep saying you dont want to hear this that or this isnt the point ... when somebody responds to your comments, they can make it a point ... you do not dictate where the discussion goes just because you dont want to hear it. your views or beliefs arent right just because you think so. just my .02
administrator said:This is not at all what I'm doing. I hope this is as clear as day to everyone except you.
I asked about whether Bush's lack of fiscal discipline was of concern to true conservatives. I suggest it is.
Answering by saying "Kerry is a liberal" doesn't address my question.
If you asked someone in the gym what anabolic steroids they thought would comprise an effective bulking stack, and they started spouting out some irrelevant bullshit about how bee pollen mixed with st john's wort would put on some quality muscle...
I guarantee that you'd be irritated too.
I just want people to answer the friggin question and stop trying to reframe the question to fit their pre-packaged answer.
But you're right, I can't make anyway give me an honest, straightforward answer. However, I sure wish more people were willing to do this.
Get it?
