Thin Snowpack in West Signals Summer of Drought
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/23/us/in-drought-stricken-heartland-snow-is-no-savior.html?_r=0
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/23/us/in-drought-stricken-heartland-snow-is-no-savior.html?_r=0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In sum, the work reveals a fresh, and very long, climate “hockey stick.”
So here's the state of play of climate science a third of a decade into the global warming hysteria. They don't have a reliable baseline of global temperature measurements that would allow them to say what is normal and natural and what isn't. Their projections about future warming are demonstrably failing to predict the actual data. And now they have been caught, yet again, fudging the numbers and manipulating the graphs to show a rapid 20th-century warming that they want to be true but which they can't back up with actual evidence.
The End of an Illusion
Money quote:
Read the whole thing. It's all coming down. Just like ObamaCare.
The world is starting to make more sense now. Hopefully this is a trend and reason will continue to replace the herd mentality.
The Tracinski Letter | AboutThe Tracinski Letter is a newsletter covering culture and politics from an individualist perspective based on Ayn Rand’s philosophy of Objectivism.
When we consider all the available data, it becomes quite clear that ocean and global warming continue unabated at a rapid rate. Cherrypicking cannot change that reality.
Heh. I liked how Rich Lowry put this on Fox News this morning, following up on his http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/344426/new-climate-deniers-rich-lowry earlier this week — how often have people who, calmly and rationally, dare to question the notion that humanity is hurtling toward a man-made, imminent, and irreversible warming catastrophe been written off as heretical “climate-deniers” who “ignore/hate science”? As The Economist‘s recent reappraisal of the climate-change issue illustrated, however, there’s now more and more data piling up that the earth’s temperature has actually been pretty much stable over the past decade or so, despite the gobs of greenhouse gases we’ve been continuously adding to the atmosphere. All of the old favorite climate models are perilously close to completely falling apart, since it turns out that the planet might not be quite as sensitive to carbon emissions as they projected, and it appears that the scaremongers and doomsayers’ continuing insistence that we must put a halt on our economic activity to combat the problem makes them the real climate deniers and science haters. Oh, how the tables have turned!
None of this is to necessarily say that climate change is not an issue with which we should be concerned, but rather that the fact that all of that oh-so-very “settled science” actually isn’t settled science suggests that some of the determined alarm-peddlers just might have had ulterior motives in mind, hem hem.
