I don't understand why there isn't real science to back up those claims.
Because this was never really a chem intended for humans in any country likely to conduct studies.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't understand why there isn't real science to back up those claims.
At least i had a breakthrough today. That Ec stack is the motherfucking shit!Unless you are unusually sensitive to sugar while simultaneously having a major resistance the DN-motherfucking-P you are probably ok.
Because of the heat carbs lead to I've been thinking carbs augment the effect of DNP, but that's my bro science for you.
Because this was never really a chem intended for humans in any country likely to conduct studies.
Thanks for checking in. I think that the most compelling information on carbs helping with Dnp weight loss is the calorie deficit that occurs once the carbs are obliterated by the heat reaction. Its convenient, i guess, for those who absolutely need carbs and can balance the carb/calorie intake to arrive at a deficit. Quite clever, if indeed the carbs are being burned off.It has a lot do with the fact that AMPK activation via DNP can increase insulin sensitivity and insulin sensitivity + carbs = enhanced thermic effect = enhanced heat
Except it was a legally available, over the counter drug intended for fat loss in the 30s and does actually have a good amount of data on it
Also drug studies from that era had a rather gigantic number of issues with methodology which is why they are generally not regarded as great reference material without more modern studies as follow ups.
Just saying. Prior legality is not a solid indicator of safety nor plentiful testing by reliable standards.
I read the evidence and take into account any flaws when deciphering the strength of the results shown - dismissing it outright without any evidence to the contrary is a foolish approach to adopt.
Because this was never really a chem intended for humans in any country likely to conduct studies.
Oh, don't worry, I'll never take more than 500mg a day. 1000mg accumulation is enough. I don't want to creep towards those lethal doses.OP please do not up the dose again until you've been on for weeks 4 days wasn't enough time to get use to it in your system and more isn't better, it's wreckless going on that train of thought
The FDA disagreed nearly the day it was established.... in the 1930's in point of fact. The also read the evidence (even by the dubious drug safety standards of the day, which was the reason the FDA was established) and ruled it "not fit for human consumption" in 1938.
Ergo, it was not intended for human consumption other than by snake oil salesman who would have also cheerfully intended tapeworms, cocaine, and carrying small chunks of plutonium around with you as "intended for human use".
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2007 Jul;48(2):115-7. Epub 2007 Mar 31.
Dinitrophenol and obesity: an early twentieth-century regulatory dilemma.
Colman E1.
The only studies post 1938 have been animal studies because you know.... medical ethics are a thing... in most countries.
I've used DNP many times over the past few years and have researched it pretty extensively - just in case that wasn't obvious already.
Ya, about that.... I know that's a very clever method, but I'm on ketosis. That sugar will knock me off ketosis.
Ya, must of been that clen. It desensitized me some how. Yesterday, I was at 750mg accumulation, and today, after my second dose, I'll be at 916mg accumulation. Surely, I'll feel it today. Either way, I'll keep truckn'But man, no sides, you must be made of cryptonite dude lol
The FDA disagreed nearly the day it was established.... in the 1930's in point of fact. The also read the evidence (even by the dubious drug safety standards of the day, which was the reason the FDA was established) and ruled it "not fit for human consumption" in 1938.
Ergo, it was not intended for human consumption other than by snake oil salesman who would have also cheerfully intended tapeworms, cocaine, and carrying small chunks of plutonium around with you as "intended for human use".
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2007 Jul;48(2):115-7. Epub 2007 Mar 31.
Dinitrophenol and obesity: an early twentieth-century regulatory dilemma.
Colman E1.
The only studies post 1938 have been animal studies because you know.... medical ethics are a thing... in most countries.