Dr Jims Hplc/ms Data

Just spoke with the lab director today and whom forwarded lllCOLUMN to the manufacture


The MS are revealing enough BUT the HPLC (standard/sample) comparative data is mandatory to ensure a high level of credibility!

Oh yea it's very frustrating especially if you reviewed the MS
results.

Oh that's right I'm mistaken, one can post legit qualitative and quantitative sample data using a MS alone, NOT.

Damn it felt nice just to post something BUT I won't post BS and such restraint when mates understandably want results is indeed frustrating.

And I'm not knocking those fellas who like me want these results, but we gotta get it RIGHT guys.

Regs
Jim
Such a tease! :oops:
 
:)
No, I don't drink..
BUT I do eat a lot of female butt, and it makes me delirious at times..

One popular guy on this board told me he
got good at MS and he can have an idea of purity to
some degree with it.. not trying to sell me on his MS.. just PM conversation

I never saw the tests, so I have no idea.

M
 
There is NO WAY this can be done especially considering the amount of impurities in UGL gear.

Additionally there is no means of knowing what compounds and how many did not "ionize" and as such are NOT being displayed on the MS spectrograph.

Ergo I must conclude your friend was either a bro practicing "bro science", delusional or mentally deranged :)

Actually there are several more reasons why this can't be done.
 
There is NO WAY this can be done especially considering the amount of impurities in UGL gear.

Additionally there is no means of knowing what compounds and how many did not "ionize" and as such are NOT being displayed on the MS spectrograph.

Ergo I must conclude your friend was either a bro practicing "bro science", delusional or mentally deranged :)

Actually there are several more reasons why this can't be done.
Or maybe he had ulterior motives?
 
Ok fellas he is the most recent update on those 13 samples we began analyzing some THREE MONTHS AGO arg!

Recall the column I recently purchased was trashed and had to be returned to the manufacturer bc a tech did not follow protocol and clogged the damn thing. Well after the column was replaced the problem remained, the esterified AAs were not eluting from the C-18 grid in reverse phase (or normal phase).

So we consulted probably one of the most knowledgable chemists in the field of AAS production and analysis. He is convinced if a pure silica phase column was substituted and used in normal phase, in addition to a few select changes in the reverse and stationary solvents, the "problem" will be resolved.

So I get to spend another 1.2K, to finish what I started, yea baby. So hopefully we are looking at another month.

I'm really sorry guys but these issues are just NOT within my control, bc rest assured if they were, those results would be available TWO WEEKS after their submission.

Regs
jim
 

Damn how did you know?

Did Mands tell you, if not F me!

Bc if word ever got out....well obviously bc of his occupational prowess, professional associations and renowned fund of AAS chemical knowledge, any testing would have to come to an abrupt halt!!!

PM me if well damn, WTF, this could really, damn I'm speechless and wordless , , , , , , ,,, Millard perhaps?

It's probably GTG as long as I know where you got that info? Some wild guess ?
 
Last edited:
Ok fellas he is the most recent update on those 13 samples we began analyzing some THREE MONTHS AGO arg!

Recall the column I recently purchased was trashed and had to be returned to the manufacturer bc a tech did not follow protocol and clogged the damn thing. Well after the column was replaced the problem remained, the esterified AAs were not eluting from the C-18 grid in reverse phase (or normal phase).

So we consulted probably one of the most knowledgable chemists in the field of AAS production and analysis. He is convinced if a pure silica phase column was substituted and used in normal phase, in addition to a few select changes in the reverse and stationary solvents, the "problem" will be resolved.

So I get to spend another 1.2K, to finish what I started, yea baby. So hopefully we are looking at another month.

I'm really sorry guys but these issues are just NOT within my control, bc rest assured if they were, those results would be available TWO WEEKS after their submission.

Regs
jim

Patience and perseverance, brother Jim. This is more of Triathlon than a 100m sprint, it seems.
 
Patience and perseverance, brother Jim. This is more of Triathlon than a 100m sprint, it seems.

I could release the MS data but bc of the contamination they raised more question than answers, at least after I reviewed them. The final page count for only 13 samples 113 pages, and that is NO BS!

This lab has busted it's ass trying to get it right yet bc of the elution patterns he/we knew the data obtained to date was NOT conclusive, so why post less than conclusive data.

Regs
jim
 
Heck I'll locate one or two MS in this pile to give you fellas a better understanding of the scope of the problem.

Perhaps doing so will help clarify why my sagacious opinion of UGLs is based upon bonafided evidence rather than some concocted disdain for an unknown entity.

Regs
Jim


Sorry about the delays guys, I've done some HGH assays of late

Hmm ,,,,,,,,,,???,,,:;;:/$&$;/;(?!$$$@&;://?.!!@(;;$&'n, damn I need a little help you know like a competent secretary.

Hey Burr can I assume your no longer employed as Angus's secretary?

I mean you obviously have experience in this field!
 
Hey Burr can I assume your no longer employed as Angus's secretary?

I've got you covered Jimmy.
Let me save you some time, there are no real steroids on the black market. That tren that had you coughing and awake, sweating all night is only !% tren.
I repeat, there are no real steroids......
 
Ha ha, same ole mass spectro scam brand new methods n motives. Watching the next 3 months of excuses should be something special.
 
Back
Top