MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
MESO-Rx Sponsor Driada Medical
- Thread starter Driada Medical
- Start date
Sterkekoffie1
Member
Sir do you know when New labtest of newest batch primos is availeble ?
Nicolaus
Member
Would you ever consider shipping to the U.S? 
-C19H28O2-
Member
After the 50% ends ,so you can buy it for the normal price loser.
Again ,what do you expect ? 70mg/ml ?
Take a look at the other oils.
shut the fuck up
Sterkekoffie1
Member
Go fuck yourself ..
I'm not a cheapskate I don't care about prices only the quality ... big names here on the forum say themselves that you can't blindly trust 1 batch before it has been tested ... I don't expect anything I just want a test see .. if you are an idiot who because gear is a few bucks more expensive but blindly assumes it's good because the previous one was good too qens good luck to you ..LOSER
Gentlemen!
Happy hours are already here and a 7% discount is waiting for you in our shop!
Also the coupon for Primo is still available here
Happy hours are already here and a 7% discount is waiting for you in our shop!
Also the coupon for Primo is still available here
https://t.me/driadamedicaleu/272
Would you ever consider shipping to the U.S?
Hello,sir!
We work on it, but to escape a painful seizures, for now, we stopped but we want to restart soon. As we will, I will post information in this thread. Keep updated,sir!
swolebusiness92
New Member
Do you ship to Scotland?
Gentlemen!
We got another thing commin'
We made some fun for our clients - you will find a lottery card in every order, and this card is a ticket to participate in two lotteries - the small one is an instant and the BIG one will take place in November.
Good luck, folks!
Gentlemen! Nice to see you again!
The last few days have forced us all to stress a little for the beloved Meso Rx by many of us.
We have even begun to forget what questions about tests for Primobolan look like!
And now the forum is online again!
And finally, the forum is working and we are announcing our promo in honor of this event!
«WELCOME BACK» 30% DISCOUNT!
To get the discount, use the
mesorx30%coupon when placing an order. The offer is already operating and will be available within 7 days.
Last edited:
broschmo
Member
S
I have a distaste for gurus in general, especially the ones who prey on already vulnerable people like Tate and his crew.
"Discussing important thoughts"? A discussion means a back and forth argumentation with two people on a perceived equal footing of knowledge about the subject/area.
Tate discusses nothing. He drops generic ass quotes that can be found on even the most misogynistic "handbooks for men" from the 50s.
He's not thought provoking, he's an echo of the past and it only appeals to people lacking strong paternal figures or who feel wronged in life and are pussies who can't deal with their own shortcomings like men, so they prefer to take it out on "women/society/sjws/liberals" or wtv the flavour of the day is.
I understand I'm a minority in the fitness community but excuse me if I'm comfortable with who I am and don't need to fall back on stereotypes to deal with life's dilemmas.
Struggling to understand what do you mean or who you are addressing in this reply.Hello, sir.
If I would say something that will change your life, or make you think, so you will call me "Daddy"?
View attachment 172139
Is it possible to get a knowledge\education in this case?
sometimes even an impartial character can bring great ideas
please, try not to consider random bloggers who ponder and discuss important thoughts as a father, sir.
That looks like orphan attitude much more.
Have a good day)
I have a distaste for gurus in general, especially the ones who prey on already vulnerable people like Tate and his crew.
"Discussing important thoughts"? A discussion means a back and forth argumentation with two people on a perceived equal footing of knowledge about the subject/area.
Tate discusses nothing. He drops generic ass quotes that can be found on even the most misogynistic "handbooks for men" from the 50s.
He's not thought provoking, he's an echo of the past and it only appeals to people lacking strong paternal figures or who feel wronged in life and are pussies who can't deal with their own shortcomings like men, so they prefer to take it out on "women/society/sjws/liberals" or wtv the flavour of the day is.
I understand I'm a minority in the fitness community but excuse me if I'm comfortable with who I am and don't need to fall back on stereotypes to deal with life's dilemmas.
broschmo
Member
Hey, incel, do you need to defend daddy on the thread? You know he's not watching right?
Why can't you deal with your own shit without blaming society and women, waaaah.
Nice to see your reply, sir.
I spoke about Jordan Peterson.
But I've watched a few of Tate's videos - not my interest, but I cannot say something strongly negative.
I can't understand the accusation of misogyny - hating women. As long as the person is not a radical homosexual, this word has no meaning and cannot be applicable here.
women's qualities are very different from men's. And when men are taught to be like girls, it greatly degrades their qualities as a men. From this point of view, calling a man feminine is really an insult -but is it hatred of women?
...could you give an example, because I did not see the hatred of the female sex?
I saw contempt for modern propaganda that denies the duties of women, but at the same time seeks to increase their rights, not at the expense of competence, but at the expense of strange demagoguery of being permanent victims.
Last edited:
So the summer has passed. We hope each of you enjoyed it, gained strength and is now ready for the new "bulking season"
Meanwhile, there are 90 people left before the first thousand subscribers and we will be ready to celebrate this event!
In the meantime, let's have a new GIVEAWAY!
This Saturday we will summarize the results and select 10 winners with the help of a randomizer. Each winner will be able to choose a gift for ANY ORDER:
– 3 x Testos 250 mg/ml (Testosterone Enanthate)
or
– 2 x Primos 100 mg/ml (Methenolone Enanthate)
To participate it, go to our bot @Driada_Giveaway2_bot, click the "start" button and follow the instructions. Your application for participation will be accepted, and your account ID will be displayed, it will be used to determine the winners after.
Good luck to everyone!
Code:
https://t.me/driadamedicaleu/292broschmo
Member
Jordan Peterson plays into the same loop of apologizing incel behaviour with made-up terms like "cultural marxism" or "neo-marxism" or whatever made up term he likes to prop up with ahistorical, delusional claims that have absolutely no meaning or founding in actual reality and social structure and relations.
You jammed a bunch of words together from which I really can't extract any meaning of but I guess there's a bit of a language barrier here, even though English is not my first language either.
This is also, in my opinion, not the place to have deep conversations about social science or political ideologies in the 21st Century.
If you want to learn about those topics though, there are much better sources then those two.
Maybe try reaching into the actual foundational books of the ideologies they try to speak of or pick up some social science studies. They help expose the void of content in their opinions.
One can criticize a consumerist society, who devoids PEOPLE - not only men - of meaning. And we should talk about it. Criticize it. Strive for change.
One can also speak about how consumerism and capitalism actively detach us from meaningful connections, meaningful work, meaningful lives. And we should.
What Jordan Peterson does though is just a lot of projecting (ie: projecting the failures of capitalism unto other ideologies).
And Tate does a lot of projecting aswell (ie: projecting the shortcomings of men raised in an unstable society and flailing economy unto women/feminism).
I will not do your research for you, YouTube is filled with compilations, documentaries and exposes on both of these characters. Especially Tate because he garnered such hatred from his toxic comments.
What's funny is that he's not an idiot, he's smart. He knows how to stir up a reaction and then profit of it (like the insanely cringy scam that is his Hustle University - you pay hundreds to speak with a chat moderator on discord).
He says what the people want to hear, not what they need to hear.
They want to hear its not their fault, there's nothing they can do other than belittling others to prop themselves up. It's not my fault, it's sOciETY.
It's a defeatist mentality filled with hatred and sold in a package of "grindset".
You know what really makes a good man?
Being honest, caring for others, taking care of yourself and your family, respecting and loving your partner, not looking for excuses in the face of adversity and taking RESPONSABILITY for YOUR actions, even if they take place in a society that you do not care for (neither do I for that matter).
Last edited:
Sounds like you never read none of his books or watch his lectures only in neomaxist remixes\mashaps\compilations?
I can't discuss Tate with you, I'm hardly familiar with his work, but I've read all three of Peterson's books and watched every lecture I could find. I won’t say that I understood everything, but I didn’t catch what you write about there, so it’s interesting to know from you what I missed?
Cos his main idea is COMPLETLY opposite to the things you say.
His quote: The more responsibility you take on the more meaning your life has. Became viral and really inspiring for me.
Has nothing in common with your: It's not my fault, it's sOciETY - which is actually the main argument of his opponents, who blame everything on toxic masculinity, systemic racism and other mythical vices of sOciETY
One of the Chapters in 12 Rules for Life is called: Take responsibility for your life.
To say that Jordan Peterson is wrong, and then repeat his quotes verbatim(almost).
Is this your trolling, sir?
I can't discuss Tate with you, I'm hardly familiar with his work, but I've read all three of Peterson's books and watched every lecture I could find. I won’t say that I understood everything, but I didn’t catch what you write about there, so it’s interesting to know from you what I missed?
Is there an examples of ahistorical and delusional claims? Because all you say is subjective evaluation, and cannot be an argument. in fact you used a lot of terms to say I DON'T LIKE HIM. What about the objective arguments?
Yeah, it's not my first language too, but feel free to mark the parts I describe in inappropriate manner
I believe that any issue in the world comes down to a political issue. Of course, we can discuss the works of Hayek, von Mises and M. Rothbard, Baron Evola and Nietzsche, but Peterson was touched upon in our dialogue, let's stay on it. For other things, you can really create a separate topic, it will be interesting to see your thoughts.
Documentaries(like Rise of JP ) that were made by his ideological enemies, and the same about compilations? I bet you didn't read his books, don't you, sir?
Are you sure it's about this Jordan Peterson?
Cos his main idea is COMPLETLY opposite to the things you say.
His quote: The more responsibility you take on the more meaning your life has. Became viral and really inspiring for me.
Has nothing in common with your: It's not my fault, it's sOciETY - which is actually the main argument of his opponents, who blame everything on toxic masculinity, systemic racism and other mythical vices of sOciETY
One of the Chapters in 12 Rules for Life is called: Take responsibility for your life.
Therefore, I conclude that you are either very mistaken or engaged in deliberate misinformation.
To say that Jordan Peterson is wrong, and then repeat his quotes verbatim(almost).
Is this your trolling, sir?
Last edited:
broschmo
Member
I read 300 pages of 12 Rules for Life. It's currently sitting as a leveler at my lumpy table.
Best use I've given that book, also the most expensive table leveler I bought.
Yeah, figured you're a fan of Mises Institute, Mayek and probably Ayn Rand too, cause why not be a sociopath?
I think this is not the place for the debate for obvious reasons... well, at least if I ran a store I'd try to stay away from political arguments just in case you may steer potential clients away for having ridiculous views on the world.
I commend you for doing it though, it's good to know who we make business with so we can maybe choose to go a different path and put more money in the hands of people we can relate to.
I work for living though, bro. I'm at work atm.
You read a lot of JP and JP related shit, have you ever tried maybe, I dunno, reading the works of the people and ideologies he so vehemently speaks against?
There's a reason why JP refuses to engage in open debate with fellow scholars with much more knowledge about the subject. He knows he will get exposed. He knows his views and opinions have no historical backing.
Cultural marxism and neomarxism are made up terms.
Cultural marxism, especifically, has absolutely no meaning and is used to refer anything the right views as opposing traditional family values. It's a coping mechanism. It's a scapegoat. It's refusing to accept responsibility.
JP can tell you 1000x times to clean your room. Actions speak louder than words. He's unable to even follow his own preachings and clean his shit up.
That's a tell tale sign of a shitty guru - do as I say, don't do as I do.
As I said, if you wanna know about shit, maybe don't go by third person reports.
Pick up a book.
I read Mises. I read Ayn Rand. I read Rothbard.
Did I puke a little in my mouth while reading it? Sure did. Still read it.
Know your enemy so you can better fight it and maybe don't make an ass out of yourself online.
Also, if you are so keen about being responsible for change, what are you doing socially and politically to enact change in the status-quo?
Other than running an online drug store and watching JP documentaries at home?
EDIT:
I'm gonna throw you a bone that his probably too big for you to chew on but there you go.
By the way, I'm not a Zizek fan as I am, in fact and proudly, a marxist-leninist and Zizek is an hegelian idealist who criticizes Marx's work.
The difference is Zizek has actually read Marx's work and brings about good criticism which is valued for evolving the ideology to the future.
While Peterson did 10min Google search of "what is Marxism?" and proceeds to speak about it like he knows what he speaks of, only to get exposed time and time again.
View: https://youtu.be/qsHJ3LvUWTs
Last edited:
I too can lie that I have read all the books whose titles I know, but if I take from them content, that directly opposite to what is written, as we found in your argument about responsibility ... then this is not reading, but dementia or Mrxist-Leninist demagogy... or its the same?
This dialogue can last forever, but there was a questions, sir.
Would you answer them? otherwise, it's not a dialogue but two monologues.
Should I also send my ID here? ))
P.s. not Ayn Rand , please.=)
P.P.S. and yes, let's remove this conversation somewhere, but I'm really interested in your answers
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Sticky
