MESO-Rx Sponsor Driada Medical

Through the thread there’s been contradictory comments on whether ethyl oleate is used. So to clarify, with regards to testosterone cypionate, is ethyl oleate used in any capacity? Is there a difference in formulation between vials and ampoules?
 
Through the threat there’s been contradictory comments on whether ethyl oleate is used. So to clarify, with regards to testosterone cypionate, is ethyl oleate used in any capacity? Is there a difference in formulation between vials and ampoules?

Hello, sir!

There is no difference in formulation between vials and ampoules.
What about ethyl oleate - its not a carrier oil, we add nececarry low amount into our products for better solubility and antiseptic-antimicrobial properties.
Amount of EO is really low.
 
huge text about... nothing.
questions were
View attachment 172368
and it's still subjective evaluations.


The thing that neo-Marxist calls social science and political science has nothing in common with science at all. Yes, and if someone disagrees with your mythology, that you called science, you cannot kill him in GULAG :)


P.S. and its a stupidity or hypocritical to call red ideology scapegoat.

According to the The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression ,the number of people killed by the Communist governments amounts to more than 94 million.   The statistics of victims include deaths through executions, man-made hunger, famine, war, deportations, and forced labor. The breakdown of the number of deaths is given as follows:

65 million in the People's Republic of China
20 million in the Soviet Union
2 million in Cambodia
2 million in North Korea
1.7 million in Ethiopia
1.5 million in Afghanistan
1 million in the Eastern Bloc
1 million in Vietnam
150,000 in Latin America
10,000 deaths "resulting from actions of the international Communist movement and Communist parties not in power"

A scapegoat is a person who is blamed for the wrongdoings, mistakes, or faults of others, especially for reasons of expediency.

And reds are guilty. that's all.

View attachment 172369



I think you don't like Peterson because he gives people independence from the herd. The very herd where the communists are trying to drive all the people, and the herd, part of which you voluntarily declared yourself.
when I ask about the reasons, all you could give me was that he googled the definition of Marxism.
Of course, in a debate of this level, Peterson can't just define marxism as bullshit , so he needs to google more acceptable definitions, but this does not substantiate your claims still.

Best regards.
You quoting the Black Book of Communism, you lost the little sliver of credibility I was hanging on to regarding your intellectual ability and honesty.

You - like Peterson - have no clue what communism is. Talking about herd mentality... have you looked around?

What system drives people to derive social status from commodities, effectively, lumping people together? What system creates wars to sell guns? What system justifies undermining sovereign States and killing their people just because they don't abide by the "free market" (ie: selling your resources for cheap to the West in exchange for "investments" that only put money in the people who already have it and create even worse conditions for the workers who actually have to extract those resources)?

I already said I'm not interested to discuss ideology with people who struggle with the most basic definitions of: capitalism, socialism, communism, free market and planned economy.

Get back at me when you have a clear definition of those terms.

Obviously, as soon as I said, and reiterate, that I'm a marxist-leninist, the discussion turns into fear mongering, 80s red terror vibes propaganda. None of which help elaborate your view.

You're attacking strawman and preying on people's lack of education to steer up support for your argument.

Truth is:
JP is completely dismissed by actual historians, social scientists or philosophers regarding his political thinking because it has no historical backing or meaning.
Post-modernism and marxism are complete opposites. Saying shit like "post-modernist marxists" is a complete oxymoron. He gets called on it on the debate and has to go through hoops and ladders to try and justify what he means. He means nothing because he understands nothing about political ideology.
He read the Communist Manifesto once (Manifesto's are usually written as panflets or propaganda appealing to action, not scientific literature) and thinks he is an authority on Marxism. It's laughable. And you clearly been drinking from that kool-aid far too long that questioning makes your entire view of the world crumble and that makes you uncomfortable. Sowie.

To the dude saying I need to get my E2 checked. I'm fine bruh.
Like I said, I choose my fights. Striving for a better tomorrow pulls on my heart strings. I'm ok with coming across a little bit emotional because I am. It's okay to have emotions, despite what your internet daddy says.

That being said, I'm not making emotional arguments. I'm presenting my opinion based on actual facts.

Go read up on Courtois and what he did to reach on his "death toll" of communism.

By the way, since everyone is so interested in thar, is anyone interested in the death toll of capitalism? :


For the reading impaired (not as accurate as the study tho):

Dxk9bYiWwAElbFF.jpeg.jpg

Have fun with your mental gymnastics, I'm sure you'll find a way to justify that.
 
Back
Top