Weekly Volume for Each Lift:
Front Squat: 69 total reps with intensity ranging from 80%, 85%, 75%
Romanian Deadlift: 69 total reps with intensity ranging from 80%, 85%, 75%
Weighted Dips: 69 total reps with intensity ranging from 80%, 85%, 75%
Incline Barbell Bench: 69 total reps with intensity ranging from 80%, 85%, 75%
Weighted Chinup: 69 total reps with intensity ranging from 80%, 85%, 75%
Weighted Pullup: 69 total reps with intensity ranging from 80%, 85%, 75%
Almost 70 total reps performed for each lift in a single week with intensity going as high as 85%...that is not light weight, and that is a very high weekly volume relative to intensity.
This doesn't include the volume from accessory and isolation work btw......workout 1 has about 150 total reps from accessory and iso work and workout 2 has about 120 repetitions performed. Accessory and isolation work is performed 3x a week....although the intensity there is low.
My OPINION here as a bodybuilder is this is not an advanced bodybuilding routine. It is “advanced” but training movements and training muscle are not the same. Everyone is different, but I have my reasons. And to me this is not enough work especially for the big muscle groups like legs and back when weighed against volume and failure.
Here’s my reasoning.
1. Your primary movements paired with accessory - let’s just start with front squats. 69 reps per week at 75-85% 1RM. That is your ONLY quad movement that is based on progressive overload with high intensity, yes? Add to that ONLY 90 reps per week of isolation/accessory work on leg extensions. That’s 160 reps total IF you assume front squats are quad work only. If you’ve never hit high volume, high weight sets of 15-20+ on leg press, squats, hacks you are missing MAJOR growth potential.
On another note, if you do not regularly test a 1RM, you’re SOL. My 1RM would not stack up anywhere near my ability to perform reps with a % of that 1RM on squats.
Back - you’re training it directly EVERY single day either through chins or pull-ups with little to no work in the plane perpendicular to your body (56 reps a week of “accessory” rows and some light reverse flyes)
Chest - zero accessory work and absolutely no volume with your only primary chest movement being an Incline Press
Shoulders - zero OHP anywhere for the duration
2. Your selection of movements for 1RM basis - this may also be my opinion, but RDL, pull-ups, and dips are not movements where 1RM should be considered in their performance, not for bodybuilders or really anyone. They are indeed great movements, but if your goal is development based off compound lifts and their heavy sets I believe your standard should be a row, a standard or sumo DL, and an OHP. The synergy of the dip in chest/delts/triceps should be accomplished with presses, not dips.
3. Programmed deloads - i struggle with this on EVERY level as a bodybuilder. IMO hypertrophy work need not be so intense that you need a full weeks break every 4-6 weeks. Training the muscle and training yourself into extreme fatigue is not 1:1 to me.
4. Bodybuilding work is absurdly simple because there isn’t usually a need to make it complicated. Growth is not sitrcity based off of weight moved and therefore a tricky protocol to manage the workload; hypertrophy is far more diverse than that and the lack of movement diversity/movements with good bracing for true muscle involvement, lack of failure/high rep sets/intensity techniques to go beyond failure is going to leave growth on the table.
5. The periodization and undulation is narrow. Your range is 75-85% only, with reps never below 5 or over 10 on the intense sets (and since you’ve said no failure, there’s no variation here).
This is strictly my opinion. No hate intended. I do not think this sort of routine leads to superior muscle development and an aesthetic look. There’s a reason this sort of program isn’t being used by anyone who’s of significance in the pro bodybuilding world.
This is however what I’d consider an extremely capable performance based routine. Training primary lifts 3x a week with strength based functional movements does that job.