Please post up some news articles where the DEA worked DOWN the food chain and prosecuted customers the way you're alluding to here. When cops bust the dealer, they don't work to find the customers. Oh, and GETMs website is on a server, in Arizona. So they are subject to tapping.
I alluded to the possibility of LE going after customers. The dea have recently said this is coming. No, I don't have a cite for that at the moment but will post it if/when I find it.
Re GETM, As I said, I've never used them but I don't believe they take orders on their website so your point is irrelevant.
.
OK...tough guy. I hear you. But you misunderstood me. I am a private source for vets at the moment. GETM doesn't have many vets who have purchased their gear to my knowledge. Jim did/does. But who else? If shown wrong I would openly admit such...I always do. I would imagine Sworder got his free. Bens was free. Manwhore was free. These aren't customers.
How many vets currently running cycle logs of your gear on Meso are paying customers?
That can be your opinion all you want. Most guys with the option. to purchase domestic or international choose domestic. This is kindergarten shit. As Ben said; vets dont even consider it a debate. Its common fucking sense.
So what? It doesn't change what I said based on my experience.
Is that so? Think before you speak. Which vet was using GETM months ago, and has since switched to me? Name one. Bueller? Bueller?
I'll concede this point to you for now. It seens I was thinking of somebody else.
For a short time...you're right. I will be open and GETM customers would have a chance to switch. I think I need my hatorade avatar back, why does it have to be marketing ploy? Because certainly I couldn't be getting my ducks in a row and trying to remain cautious right? Imbecile is how you spell the word BTW.
Oh, no! Not a spelling flame! Boy, you sure showed me.
I'm sure you are trying to remain cautious but intentional or not, it was a damn effective marketing ploy. And what's wrong with using a marketing ploy? It worked didn't it? Giving free gear to vets in exchange for a review was marketing plow too - otherwise, why do it?
I'm too obtuse to discern your point here. SF offered both domestic or international. I didn't think I needed to flame them for giving options. You act respectful but yiur cynicism is glaringly obvious when you use words like "peddling"to describe the work I did for SF.
You know...where I posted to the forum for people NOT to buy the HGH because it was most likely bunk. Where I demanded the GH be tested and when the tests came back bad threatened to quit if it wasn't pulled? But yeah I was a peddler. What a fucking idiotic statement that was.
Would you prefer distinguished sales representative for SteroidsFax Inc.? Maybe the SF senior public relations specialist for Meso-Rx? Refering to it as "the work I did for SF" makes it sound like facilitating the sale of illegal drugs is a noble profession. It is what it is.
Of course I am a source for the money. Plain and simple. I have been successful early on because my view of the business is to be 100% transparent and honest 100% of the time. And people sense that.
Good for you. I believe you're honest and you'll provide a decent product. I'm not disputing that.
The point I tried to make, and you don't seem to grasp, is when you became Stretch the Source, you ceased to be Stretch the Regular Member. No matter what you say about being a private source or having a limited clientelle, criticizing other sources gives the appearance an agenda. I'm not saying you do have an agenda but the appearance is there. If your image is a concern to you, it will serve you well to think about that, IMO.
