No, we are just super protective over our husbands, even if they do stupid shit. We can bash them and talk as much as we want, but its a different story when its other people doing it. Thats just how us women are, lol.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
GearGodess is Meso's biggest scam
- Thread starter OdieM
- Start date
No, we are just super protective over our husbands, even if they do stupid shit. We can bash them and talk as much as we want, but its a different story when its other people doing it. Thats just how us women are, lol.
OdieM
Banned
I was told different or I would of never tagged her here. Thought she had a lot to say. I will humbly bite my tongue now and wonder why I got an ear full of nonsense. Women are aliens.
Eman
Master
This I agree with!
I can't help but feel you could and/or should have mentioned this before man, why didn't you? That word "misleading" is coming to mind to me again... Again, was not expecting it that's for sure.
I mean I understand but we both know that it goes on here... Home brewed stuff is sold behind the scenes here and it's not tested. Makes no difference if the customer is willing to spend the money on it being untested or not does it?
Happycamper
New Member
God I want to unignore all those on my ignore list to see what has sparked the drama again but I wont...
Are the people upset about the tar and feathering of the private sources up in arms because it makes it an unfavorable place for people to sell gear around here if alarms are thrown up like they were here? Is that the elephant in the room that we are trying to fight around? Genuine question because that would make a lot more sense as to why there is such polarity in opinion about the whole thing.
Are the people upset about the tar and feathering of the private sources up in arms because it makes it an unfavorable place for people to sell gear around here if alarms are thrown up like they were here? Is that the elephant in the room that we are trying to fight around? Genuine question because that would make a lot more sense as to why there is such polarity in opinion about the whole thing.
OdieM
Banned
Seriously? Why didn't I share that I've ran BGS gear before? I can go fetch my old bloods from his test but that will only help my case in showing what GG was pushing here. The issue was that GG was slinging gear on new chicks through PMs. Chicks that didn't even come to here for a source. GG PMed them with a copy and pasted advertisement out of no where. Lots here knew I ran BGS gear in the past by the way. Some of us share who we're running and let others know how it went. Just wasn't worth mentioning. It had nothing to do with anything
Is that what you think this is about? I think you are joking, aren't you?
No, what would make more sense is the fact that some of us aren't comfortable lynching members because of a personal conflict.
You know, I've been here for years and I've never kill filed anyone. Never met anyone that bothered me enough, or was important enough, to warrant it. The fact that you've only been here for a few months and already have "all those" in your kill file is interesting...
He is private like me so IF you talk about it, refer to him as a 'private source'..
Copied and pasted from a conversation with GG.
So yes, she's a private source.
Ive gotten hooked up with a few private sources in my time here. And all have turned out to be great sources. It puzzles me why anyone would be upset over someone pm'ing them a hookup, its not like you have to use that source. But then again im not a drama queen soooooooo.
And FWIW i pretty much agree with everything CBS had to say about this whole thing.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
And FWIW i pretty much agree with everything CBS had to say about this whole thing.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Happycamper
New Member
Explain please. I'm not understanding.
Edit : Nevermind. I get it. I just want to be here to discuss lifting so I have ignored people who instigate drama. Makes it more fun.
Happycamper
New Member
I'm absolutely not joking and I meant it as a genuine question. I'm not sure of the atmosphere regarding private sources nor the etiquette, so perhaps spotlighting members who do promote product like was done here is a no no. I'm just trying to suss out what is right and wrong here. No use in being condescending when I'm trying to understand the rules and etiquette here.
Just an FYI, the people that instigate drama are usually the ones that make this place fun. Only discussing lifting gets old really quick. Meso is a great and informative forum and it can be a lot of fun, just don't take it too seriously or you'll soon tire of it.
Happycamper
New Member
I mean, sure. If you're into that sort of thing. It's fun for a bit, that's for sure. But this one got especially tiresome after a while and I had some PRs to hit, not strangers to argue with
Thanks to the advice of members like @Perrin Aybara and @TANGO.ECHO.KILO and @Trapmonster I got through a successful cycle. Listening to the member in question I would have been too hungry to hit the weights aND convinced how much better primo was than var, when low dose var is actually really sufficient as far as beginners go.
Then why are you complaining about this thread?
You're a smartass, huh? You might just fit in here after all. I'll be watching you!
As far as I'm concerned there is no reason for any member to ever provide unsolicited advice about where to buy AAS via the private messaging system. If you didn't want it. If you didn't request it. It is unsolicited. I'd recommend reporting all such abuse of the PM system if it was not preceded by any previous correspondence.
Secret/private sources have long abused the PM system as a sales platform. This does more harm than good for the MESO community. No MESO member is under any obligation to protect or cover up this practice.
Take a look at the following discussion about secret/private sources on MESO for more information:
Private Sources and Why They Aren't the Answer
Happycamper
New Member
I referenced this as soon as this all went down to get a sense of the etiquette but the discussions left me a bit confused. I didn't want to be a 'tattle' so to speak, so I read the discussions. They raised more questions in regards to the matter, although the message in the sticky is very clear and one I agree with wholeheartedly.
I understand that many new and established members alike are reluctant to report PM spam involving secret/private source. Like you said, they don't want to be called a tattle-tell, snitch, rat, etc. But why should anyone give a fuck about protecting source spam? It's in direct contradiction to protecting members.
If you've only been a member for 3 months or less, it's a clear red flag when someone, out of the blue, sends you a PM with a source recommendation. And I'd also be highly suspicious of ANYONE, regardless of their "status", who "befriends" you in such a short period to privately promote sources. They may genuinely be trying to help you but...
Beware that sources know AAS forums provide a highly-targeted audience of people looking for AAS and eager to accept the "friendship" of those who can facilitate the process. They are going to aggressively exploit that fact for every penny that it is worth.
Again, no one is under any obligation to protect this practice. Anyone who calls you a snitch or rat for reporting it doesn't have the best interest of the community in mind. Covering up the practice only protects the secret/private sources and their ability to target/exploit newbies again and again in the future.
Crystal234
New Member
None of us ever asked for a source and were solicited. I think that says enough.
Exactly.
I have no idea what anyone's motivations are or were but most of these women were completely new to the world of AAS. Make a few posts touting your vast experience and offering helpful advice to the newcomers. Gain their trust and then within a few weeks PM them a private source.
If a guy were doing this exact same thing to new male members on a regular basis he would be called out by multiple people on the board once it was discovered. To me this shouldn't be any different just because females are involved on both sides of the PM's.
