POST THEM ALL !
I know all too well the difference between AAA and HPLC Dr. JIM, you seem to be the uneducated one.
Yep as I suspected a lab rat from an UGL, let see you post YOUR DATA!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
POST THEM ALL !
I know all too well the difference between AAA and HPLC Dr. JIM, you seem to be the uneducated one.
He's not involved with Pharmacom and isn't the only one interested in the raw data.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
POST THEM ALL !
YES that info IS AVAILABLE but what is your interest in reviewing it, as I'm not willing to jump thru hoops for some UGL detective from Pharmacon (I suspect) until they post their
assays proving what they are producing has been undergone formal analytical testing.
Lets see you cite that info FIRST fella!
Yep as I suspected a lab rat from an UGL, let see you post YOUR DATA!
Really the "raw data" is cited alongside EVERY SAMPLE, now who's "not reading"?
Oh and I'm also not the "only one" interested in ANY DATA you fellas have that will contradict these results!
How would you know. And what I'd say to both of you, is if you don't like what Dr j and mands are doing, please start you're own testing program to refute what they are doingHe's not involved with Pharmacom and isn't the only one interested in the raw data.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's what I thought more of the same BULLSHIT!
You fellas are all the same bc the only evidence YOU HAVE is a willingness to discredit that which in front of you Post any analytical data that refutes these assays or there's nothing to discuss!
Try shifting the burden of proof harder it might work with others, but not with me!
How would you know. And what I'd say to both of you, is if you don't like what Dr j and mands are doing, please start you're own testing program to refute what they are doing
How would you know. And what I'd say to both of you, is if you don't like what Dr j and mands are doing, please start you're own testing program to refute what they are doing
So what you are really saying, crap we are caught with our pants down bc we didn't test our products and can't prove we did!
What a shame lets see the Q and A lists you gave your resellers I bet they tell the real story.
Goes something like this
Low IGF ------ "bad testing time or lab"
low GH ------ "how long did you leave that GH out of the fridge"
Thank you for answering my questions on point and not being evasive at all!
Also, if I posted any data you'd just start bullshitting again about me manipulating the data or the samples being tampered with.
Again the burden of proof is not on ME to deliver anything.
The burder of proof is ON YOU to convince the member that you are
1) knowledgeable on the subject. (and this isn't done by not answering any kind of technical question anybody might have and by ad hominems)
2) that your testing is accurate as you state and have stated many times
Also good job on parroting.
How do we know you are not Barbra Streisand?
I like the project very much. Free testing for all? Sounds cool, I'm all in. If you read, you'd see I've stated that.
But are you really implying this all should go with any questioning?
Well okay, you stick to your bible, feel free to do it, but don't say others should do it as well.
Also good idea with that testing project, wish I had come up with something like that sooner.
How would you know. And what I'd say to both of you, is if you don't like what Dr j and mands are doing, please start you're own testing program to refute what they are doing
Are you trying to say this is a plot by mands and Dr j to get free hgh? I think that's a boss idea!Thank you for answering my questions on point and not being evasive at all!
Also, if I posted any data you'd just start bullshitting again about me manipulating the data or the samples being tampered with.
Again the burden of proof is not on ME to deliver anything.
The burder of proof is ON YOU to convince the member that you are
1) knowledgeable on the subject. (and this isn't done by not answering any kind of technical question anybody might have and by ad hominems)
2) that your testing is accurate as you state and have stated many times
Also good job on parroting.
How do we know you are not Barbra Streisand?
I like the project very much. Free testing for all? Sounds cool, I'm all in. If you read, you'd see I've stated that.
But are you really implying this all should go with any questioning?
Well okay, you stick to your bible, feel free to do it, but don't say others should do it as well.
Also good idea with that testing project, wish I had come up with something like that sooner.
Keep on going with the story that I'm a rep
No I am not, where do you see me doing that?Are you trying to say this is a plot by mands and Dr j to get free hgh? I think that's a boss idea!
Pharmacom?
I was trying to lighten the mood. You need to smoke a little cheeba sirNo I am not, where do you see me doing that?
I have no reason to doubt integrity of Mr. Mands. He hasn't said one thing untrue that I am aware of and his acting raises no suspicion on my side - he is answering questions directly, he admits he is not all-knowing and he has good manners. He doesn't use ad hominems and is pleasure to talk with.
All unlike Dr. JIM.
I didn't criticize anything or anyone. I'm thankful for the testing.
I just asked a question and questions should be encouraged not discouraged.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Pharmacom?
I was trying to lighten the mood. You need to smoke a little cheeba sir