janoshik
Subscriber
Well it seems a few of the members are interested in the raw data as well, so sending them should serve everybody well, don't you agree?
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
"Generic" GH ASSAYS
- Thread starter Dr JIM
- Start date
Well it seems a few of the members are interested in the raw data as well, so sending them should serve everybody well, don't you agree?
janoshik
Subscriber
Not really.
Eman
Master
Lol Bavaria then.
janoshik
Subscriber
That's still Germany, haha
janoshik
Subscriber
Okay Dr. JIM, good job.
You sent 7 posts as reactions to me if I count correct.
4 of them were suggesting I'm associated with some lab without any kind of evidence
0 of them were answering to my questions
Let the members make up their own mind.
Ad hominems are weapon of the stupid.
You sent 7 posts as reactions to me if I count correct.
4 of them were suggesting I'm associated with some lab without any kind of evidence
0 of them were answering to my questions
Let the members make up their own mind.
Ad hominems are weapon of the stupid.
As Ive already stated the raw data for every sample IS POSTED on each samples WORKSHEET and a chromo was posted for SAMPLE one. And what YOU see is what you get until you or anyone else cite refuting evidence, which contradicts that which is posted.
Good luck, lol
Eman
Master
Sort of the Texas of Germany.
Regardless, pretty much all of your posts have been baiting Jim and whether anyone likes Jim or not I think everyone knows what you get when you bait Jim.
You are playing games I think...
janoshik
Subscriber
8 posts
4 ad hominems
0 answers
Not sure, don't know too much about German culture.
Also I don't know, what do I get?
Now your a LIAR bc you are a LAB RAT!
janoshik
Subscriber
Where exactly did I lie? Please, point it out to me. Thank you.
9 posts
5 ad hominems
0 answers
Doc r you saying you posting the raw data would give ugl's like pharmacom a way to fake new test reports, due to the procedure and method your testing followed? That's what I gathered but I may be wrong
janoshik
Subscriber
THE RAW DATA HAS ALREADY BEEN POSTED. I am not playing games with these clowns as Ive been there and done it before. They will ask for X then Y then Z and will always find a means to cast doubt bc that is their ONLY OBJECTIVE.
If he wants to prove these assays are in error he needs to cite refuting DATA on the evidence already posted, its that simple.
If he wants to prove these assays are in error he needs to cite refuting DATA on the evidence already posted, its that simple.
Heck he has yet to cite one comment of mine that is "far fetched or simply untrue".
But Ill ask again cite these falsities "Jano"!
It's a game they all play when confronted with evidence that is contrary to what's listed on almost every vial of GH, a lower amount of GH than what was promised!
janoshik
Subscriber
Well, Mands himself says not all had been posted by far, are you saying Mands is a liar?
And you didn't even manage to answer 'X'
He has deflected, ignored, obfuscated every query I've made. Stated another way he is FOS, LOL
Have fun fellas!
Have fun fellas!
janoshik
Subscriber
What data? The single page sheet? Do you honestly believe that's all the raw data?
Or I might have missed something, in case I did please, point me to the post(s).
Also how did I not refute anything he had posted? read my posts #1103 #1105
Do I really have to go refuting all he had posted over this endless thread?
Last few pages there haven't been much to refute... Or do you consider ad hominems to be worth refuting? I certainly don't.
janoshik
Subscriber
ADIOS
