Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think he has you on ignore or at least he is acting like he does so that he doesn't have to acknowledge you. But, I 100% agree with you here.
View attachment 50869
Again, please translate.
If the shape of the peak is important, in comparison to what? Where is the control to show what a good peak, or bad peak is? What was used as a control? Where is the standard to show comparison to the value 14.733? What is the bump of 18.910? What would be considered a bad number, or far off of average. Accepted variance I mean.
Sorry, but this is all new to me. Maybe try to use an analogy of car parts. Worked well with Dr Jim when he explained his testing to the community.
Once again the data can NOT be used to correlate percentile to a samples concentration in MG bc
NO STANDARD (Humatrope) CALIBRATION CURVE is posted!
I think (I'm on my iPhone) Humatrope is listed as the control or standard is the first HPLC
And your basing that on what a ONE SAMPLE Pharmacon assay, much like many are relying on the single black top results, but hey its their money.
Understand these results were never intended to determine "who has the best GH" bc that will vary from batch to batch and likely from year to year. I suspect Jano would have a contrary opinion based on his NOT data.
What folk should be looking for is A TREND, and about the only trend to date that seems reasonably week established, ALMOST ALL UGL GH is UNDER DOSED!
Oh and FYI since Jano has no intention of contributing to this thread in a meaningful manner, or is willing to answer some of the same data related questions he posed to Mands and myself, he has made my ignore list.
I mention this not that Jano cares, bc it seems he's almost exclusively interested in tooting his own horn for profit, but to ensure other members understand why Jims rebuttals to Jano's senseless commentary will approximate zippo.
I will remain on this thread to answer the questions of those who's interest remains the pursuit of helping Meso members, until the next SAMPLES are released, and I don't KNOW when that will be.
jim
Finally, I don't know Jano, but he is taking free samples, donations, which makes it a free, donation based program and is making money off of the members. Meso members donate their samples free of charge and eagerly to benefit Meso, not one person. If he does this for a living and he already stated he did, im sure he could afford to donate some testing. He talks like he's done this for years and it seems testing is a pretty lucrative buisness. JMO
Maybe it's time to go third party (we would have to pick up the tab).Its to bad you two cant bury the hatchet and cooperate with each other. The meso community would benefit in a huge way if that were to happen. Oh well!!!? Who cares rt? As long as you come out the winner of the argument , fuck what coulda been.
And to you guys tossing insults at jano, that dont know the first thing about gh, ( never used and never studied it)PLEASE STOP!!!! Your making yourself look foolish. Not naming names but if the shoe fits..........
I think Dr JIM and a few others are qualified to debate him the rest just look like dick riders.
No, AL doesn't test that as far as I knowMaybe it's time to go third party (we would have to pick up the tab).
@Millard Baker does anabolic lab test hgh?
Bummer.No, AL doesn't test that as far as I know
Maybe it's time to go third party (we would have to pick up the tab).
@Millard Baker does anabolic lab test hgh?
Holy crap, it was getting ridiculous.Oh and FYI since Jano has no intention of contributing to this thread in a meaningful manner, or is willing to answer some of the same data related questions he posed to Mands and myself, he has made my ignore list.
I mention this not that Jano cares, bc it seems he's almost exclusively interested in tooting his own horn for profit, but to ensure other members understand why Jims rebuttals to Jano's senseless commentary will approximate zippo.
I will remain on this thread to answer the questions of those who's interest remains the pursuit of helping Meso members, until the next SAMPLES are released, and I don't KNOW when that will be.
jim
They do Sir, but they don't do it correctly from my experience.Maybe it's time to go third party (we would have to pick up the tab).
@Millard Baker does anabolic lab test hgh?
They do.No, AL doesn't test that as far as I know
@jano
Why it's impossible to PM you?
SIMEC posted the results of several GH samples on PM, unfortunately their results mimic
Janos, as they are absent any means of validation.
I would ABSOLUTELY encourage MM to conduct their own testing.
Be careful bc few foreign analytical labs are held to the same standards as those in the U.S..
SIMEC posted the results of several GH samples on PM, unfortunately their results mimic
Janos, as they are absent any means of validation.
I would ABSOLUTELY encourage MM to conduct their own testing.
Be careful bc few foreign analytical labs are held to the same standards as those in the U.S..
Sampei, why don't you go over to pro muscle and suck janos cock. Janos and Dr J are totally capable of arguing for themselvesThese are bullshit. Simec testing were completely different from
jano and they demonstrated a complete incapacity by simec to test hgh. Vials of hgh came out heavily overdosed all of them. All brands.
You are no different then the one you accuse. You spew disinformation all the fucking time just to prove your point.
Fucking clown
No. AnabolicLab is solely focusing on funding for AAS testing. I can't see see AnabolicLab raising sufficient funds for hGH testing too in the foreseeable future.Maybe it's time to go third party (we would have to pick up the tab).
@Millard Baker does anabolic lab test hgh?
SIMEC doesn't post the results anywhere. But SIMEC can certainly release all raw data for independent validation as authorized by its bclients. I'm not sure why you would think otherwise.SIMEC posted the results of several GH samples on PM, unfortunately their results mimic
Janos, as they are absent any means of validation.
Sampei, why don't you go over to pro muscle and suck janos cock. Janos and Dr J are totally capable of arguing for themselves
Too entertained watching you suck jim's cock.
Actually I didn't say that jano is right or anything but that spewing shits just to prove a point isn't very smart.
Of course you can't see it because you are blinded by all the jeez you have over your eyes.
Dr Jim can be right sometime, let's say almost all the time (big stretch here) BUT as usual he destroys all his work and arguments by his own stupidity when he comes up with shit like the one above.
Sampei... I like you man but you need to chill out and quit slinging shit at Jim.
If you keep it up the GH testing results is going to wind up being distributed in an invite only format, mark my words. Then you're going to be shit outta luck. Pick your battles and play nice to the members such as Jim that are spending a lot of time and money giving you GH testing for nothing. B66 said it best, don't bite the hand that feeds you.
Oh man... but he is talking shit out of his ass....
All right. Good bye
Thank you for clarifying that. I though i was correct, just aas.No. AnabolicLab is solely focusing on funding for AAS testing. I can't see see AnabolicLab raising sufficient funds for hGH testing too in the foreseeable future.