@Qingdao Sigma Chemicals are all your products rhCG or just the last batch (with 15000iu)?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We had 2500IU, 3500IU, 5000IU, 10kIU and 15kIU@Qingdao Sigma Chemicals are all your products rhCG or just the last batch (with 15000iu)?
All UGL chinese HCG, is rHCGThanks @Qingdao Sigma Chemicals
Is only 15000 rhCG and the others are uhCG?
XCE (rest in peace) confirmed their UGL chinese HCG was urine derived. Was XCE the only UGL chinese lab with urine derived HCG?All UGL chinese HCG, is rHCG
I believe he was wrong about the assumption.XCE (rest in peace) confirmed their UGL chinese HCG was urine derived. Was XCE the only UGL chinese lab with urine derived HCG?
There's certainly a way but I don't know it... However, I feel we might be past the point when recombinant is cheaper and that's pretty bulletproof indicator for what manufacturers are going to use.Is there a way that we can test/confirm that QSC's HCG is recombinant?
@janoshik can you chime in on whether there's a way to confirm with >95% certainty whether a vial of HCG is recombinant or not?
I want mine to come from urine, or I'm not interested. Same with my GH, I get better pumps and vascularity when I know that a corpse was sliced open for my sake to extract its pituitary gland.There's certainly a way but I don't know it... However, I feel we might be past the point when recombinant is cheaper and that's pretty bulletproof indicator for what manufacturers are going to use.
Lady piss is good for cutting. Hard and veiny guaranteed.I want mine to come from urine, or I'm not interested. Same with my GH, I get better pumps and vascularity when I know that a corpse was sliced open for my sake to extract its pituitary gland.
Keep justifying your golden shower play, you disgusting human being.Lady piss is good for cutting. Hard and veiny guaranteed.
Doctors orders. It's just for fertility. Not weird at all. That's what I tell my wife.Keep justifying your golden shower play, you disgusting human being.
Interesting. When was this? I have XCE HCG that I will probably not use if trueXCE (rest in peace) confirmed their UGL chinese HCG was urine derived. Was XCE the only UGL chinese lab with urine derived HCG?
We have 2 data points:
Sample Manufacturer Excipients Reconstitution 30-day degradation
1 Liska ? Sterile water 18.1%
2 QSC ? BAC water 0.9%
Now the question is: Does the BAC water lead to reduced degradation, or the presence of (PH-stabilizing) excipients that may or may not be in the QSC product?
For those who think it's the BAC water: What's the mechanism here? The BAC water prevents the growth of airborne bacteria that otherwise would eat up the peptide hormone? @janoshik, what's your preferred explanation?
Or could it be the difference between Urine purified and Recombinant HcG?I believe the bacteriostatic water reduce degradation, because the product do not have any pH-stabilizing excipients. Only mannitol filler.
There is actually one more data point from this study I mentioned earlier: The influence of different excipients and storage procedures on hCG (human Corionic Gonadotropin) as evidenced by spectrophotometry - Nature PrecedingsWe have 2 data points:
Sample...Manufacturer....Excipients.....Reconstitution....30-day degradation
1................Liska.................?................Sterile water.............18.1%
2................QSC..................?.................BAC water................0.9%
Now the question is: Does the BAC water lead to reduced degradation, or the presence of (PH-stabilizing) excipients that may or may not be in the QSC product?
For those who think it's the BAC water: What's the mechanism here? The BAC water prevents the growth of airborne bacteria that otherwise would eat up the peptide hormone? @janoshik, what's your preferred explanation?
I honestly don't know, but my wild guess would be living organism induced degradation - while usually insignificant, with Hcg dosed in microgram range it could have more impact relatively.We have 2 data points:
Sample...Manufacturer....Excipients.....Reconstitution....30-day degradation
1................Liska.................?................Sterile water.............18.1%
2................QSC..................?.................BAC water................0.9%
Now the question is: Does the BAC water lead to reduced degradation, or the presence of (PH-stabilizing) excipients that may or may not be in the QSC product?
For those who think it's the BAC water: What's the mechanism here? The BAC water prevents the growth of airborne bacteria that otherwise would eat up the peptide hormone? @janoshik, what's your preferred explanation?
Surprising results in the full text even though it is not relating to BAC water. Zero degradation between 4 and 25ºC. If this is accurate, then traveling with HCG would be MUCH easier.There is actually one more data point from this study I mentioned earlier: The influence of different excipients and storage procedures on hCG (human Corionic Gonadotropin) as evidenced by spectrophotometry - Nature Precedings
Sample...Manufacturer........Excipients........Reconstitution....30-day degrad.
1................Liska.....................?..................Sterile water.............18.1%
2................QSC......................?...................BAC water................0.9%
3................Pharma.......phosphoric acid.....Sterile water.............~0%
......................................&sodium hydroxide.........................................
......................................&Mannitol.......................................................