There is definitly one source that has totally 100% real here.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Janoshik Analytical laboratory testing services
- Thread starter janoshik
- Start date
Logan44551
Elite
So when you did the test originally, you used a certified standard? What was the purity of it?
Cumminstech
Well-known Member
would the method of differentiating between the two be by molecular weight?
New rHGH testing method
So, I'm not too good on assays, so my apologies. Most won't be interested, but I feel like it ought to be shared with community. As some of you, who have read my thread know, I've implemented even more strict method for testing HGH this year: Janoshik Analytical laboratory testing services Not...
thinksteroids.com
98,98% Purity
janoshik
Subscriber
I am not really up to date with the market, so it's possible - I'm just naturally quite vary.
Hydrophobicity mostly, actually.
Olofmeister
Member
Thanks to Janoshik, labtest carried out successfully, in addition he is very responsive by email and answers all questions.
janoshik
Subscriber
QUICK NOTE: Dimer testing method DID NOT change ever.
Just to avoid any confusion.
Just to avoid any confusion.
arg69
Member
there is something I don't really get and want to see if someone has experienced it as well:
why is it that pharma grade viagra at 100 mg gets me more effects than 100 mg of raw powder from a source even though it has a 99% purity score? could it be that jano or other labs are missing something when analizing? like being able to detect the shape of the molecule somewhat but not accurate enough? The same seems to happen with some test esters.
Does anyone know what is going on?
why is it that pharma grade viagra at 100 mg gets me more effects than 100 mg of raw powder from a source even though it has a 99% purity score? could it be that jano or other labs are missing something when analizing? like being able to detect the shape of the molecule somewhat but not accurate enough? The same seems to happen with some test esters.
Does anyone know what is going on?
janoshik
Subscriber
Because pharmaceuticals list 100 mg of the active substance.
100 mg of raw powder is 80 mg sildenafil and 20 mg citrate salt eg.
100 mg pharma viagra is 120 mg of raw powder of sildenafil citrate.
Numbers obviously simplified.
nope, I actually talked about this many times
nope, not at all
No actually, with testosterone (and other steroids) the inactive part is not a salt but ester, which is part of the molecules, so it's counted the same as UGLs would.
arg69
Member
thanks for the explanation bro
janoshik
Subscriber
arg69
Member
and the other question related to the later which myself and other guys in here are taking notice of is the following:
why is it possible for the same amount of testosterone (let's say 1 gram) to have different amount of total test in bloodwork when using different esters like e and c? and not a slight difference due to the amount of ester: HALF the total t for instance when switching from one to another. Given the homebrewing process is the same and perfect (I did not filter not heat to make sure the raw material is intact for this experiment, and I have years of experience homebrewing). Could it be something missing in the labs work? I will post a bigger post apart when jano results come back and I confirm they are both 99% purity as I expect.
why is it possible for the same amount of testosterone (let's say 1 gram) to have different amount of total test in bloodwork when using different esters like e and c? and not a slight difference due to the amount of ester: HALF the total t for instance when switching from one to another. Given the homebrewing process is the same and perfect (I did not filter not heat to make sure the raw material is intact for this experiment, and I have years of experience homebrewing). Could it be something missing in the labs work? I will post a bigger post apart when jano results come back and I confirm they are both 99% purity as I expect.
janoshik
Subscriber
because blood test measures only the active part of the molecule - the testosterone, after the ester part is already cleaved off
also, they have slightly different rate of ... availability if that's the right word
however, I doubt the difference between test e and c would be possible to tell for sure on blood test results....
after that it's one of the million variables with blood testing.
or problem with product.
also, they have slightly different rate of ... availability if that's the right word
however, I doubt the difference between test e and c would be possible to tell for sure on blood test results....
after that it's one of the million variables with blood testing.
or problem with product.
arg69
Member
so basically it is more probably the product not being on point, in a few days your analysis will came and I will know, thanks again bro
arg69
Member
which is bro?
janoshik
Subscriber
Usually all emails are replied within 24 hours.
If yours is not, CHECK YOUR SPAM FOLDER, then email me again.
If yours is not, CHECK YOUR SPAM FOLDER, then email me again.
arg69
Member
is is possible for a hormone to be degraded like losing some bonding or some hidrogen and been tested as pure 98+? If the method of analysis is to gueess the molecular weight that would not make out between the complete hormone and a degraded one. How does jano solves this?
janoshik
Subscriber
no
arg69
Member
so if I cook some raw past certain threshold and they degrade somewhat, in the analitics it won't count as the original hormone right?
janoshik
Subscriber
correct
Similar threads
