SpreadKaas
Subscriber
@janoshik can you please respond to my mail which is about the test that has been recently done.
Task number #36150
Task number #36150
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hi sorry my badYou sent the email 9 hours ago in the middle of the night on a weekend and it was replied to 2 hours ago.
Cheers
it was kind of an urgency for me to get a reply still thank you for responding in the weekend.No problem, but please mind that we usually don't reply emails at all during the weekend.
No. Those people are banned too. I don't recall the specifics of what you did that warranted your ban but it involved the minor children of another member:Like putting people and their families into a woodchipper, right?
There was no misinterpretation, deliberate, accidental or otherwise. You were banned for the reasons listed. Your refusal or inability to accept culpability is astounding.
Members are rarely banned on MESO. But I have very little tolerance for any who uses personal information about one's minor children, especially that which is private or otherwise not publicly known, in an attempt to intimidate another member. You not only threatened but actually carried through with this unacceptable behavior.
Again, your attempts to rationalize or justify this behavior by maintaining that you did nothing wrong is stunning.
I find this type of behavior far more offensive than the typical internet tough guy threats. That type of bullshit, while unacceptable, is inevitably inconsequential but the very act of bringing another member's minor children into the conversation in an attempt at intimidation and/or implied threat has implicit consequences.
I believe that I have made myself abundantly clear.
Now do you get it?
So you have banned Brutus for the woodchipper thing a couple years ago already?No. Those people are banned too.
Maybe try quoting me, instead of intentionally blurring your own made up lies and gaslighting to suit your then and now narrative.I don't recall the specifics of what you did that warranted your ban but it involved the minor children of another member.
There was a time early on when MESO was literally uncensored when it came to what members could say about sources of products/service with the exception of direct threats of physical harm.So you have banned Brutus for the woodchipper thing a couple years ago already?
There is no narrative other than members are banned for violating the aforementioned rules when the specific instances are reported. If I am unaware of the specific instances, I can not take action. No one receives special treatment.Maybe try quoting me, instead of intentionally blurring your own made up lies and gaslighting to suit your then and now narrative.
It is a strawman argument to saying your temporary ban five years ago was due a "highly illegal act".Anyway, why not make it clear here in the public. I am sure public discourse, especially in my own thread for the sake of transparency is nothing that you would mind and breaks no rules of this site.
Do you claim that I have used private or otherwise not publicly known information to threathen anybody - an highly illegal act?
No, not at all. Once you reported the specific post describing the sexual assault of your wife, the member was banned.I'm sure refusing to accept being called a pedophile, have rape of my wife being talked and brutal violence against me being insinuated is nothing more than a failure of "my professionalism" and me being upset about it and calling it out is nothing but me being a disgusting whiner and I should just accept it as I own a lucrative business.
This will be processed shortly. As you know, it is mandatory on MESO for all new vendors to post analytical testing results for any products they offer conducted by community-recognized testing facilities like @janoshik. This is the minimum requirement for harm reduction on MESO.Hi sorry my bad
PS: @Millard how long does it take to get access to the vendor board? I have only access to three boards which is not where I can post my vendor ad. I’ve gotten my stuff tested, let me know what the remaining requirements are.
There's no need for screenshots with Meso not deleting most posts and archive.org being around, thankfully, but Millard, all due respect, we're all seeing the progression.I have no doubt that your temporary ban was deserved for the reasons I stated contemporaneously 5 years ago or so. I do not recall the specifics of what you did nor did I keep a record of your quotes, screenshots, etc.
It is a strawman argument to saying your temporary ban five years ago was due a "highly illegal act".
As I've stated, I don't recall the specifics of your ban. So the following example is just a hypothetical about how legally bringing up a member's minor child could be interpreted as a threat...
If a source casually tells a member who criticizes them that they know the member has a 10-year old daughter or is aware of their wife's name, there is nothing illegal about that. Given that this is not public knowledge, it can be perceived as an implied threat. At the very least, it will likely have a chilling effect on what that member says about the source in the future. This is why I find invoking family members highly objectionable in these circumstances.
I can still put Brutus' woodchipper fantasies on a timeline long after I was banned for perceived offenses, so I assume it was not early enough.There was a time early on when MESO was literally uncensored when it came to what members could say about sources of products/service with the exception of direct threats of physical harm.
The scope of the restrictions has evolved since then
So it was not you, who had called me disgusting for quoting Brutus, while I was calling him out on it and then was it not you who called me a whiner for pushing the issue, that ultimately lead to his ban?The only thing I am faulting you with is the unnecessary hostility and antagonism towards me for what other members are saying about you.
And I am very appreciative of that and can do nothing more but to hold myself and my business to the highest professional, ethical and moral standard and you will always be invited and welcome guest to verify all that.This will be processed shortly. As you know, it is mandatory on MESO for all new vendors to post analytical testing results for any products they offer conducted by community-recognized testing facilities like @janoshik. This is the minimum requirement for harm reduction on MESO.
Given what's being said recently in this thread, I know it may seem weird to you and others that I've created a subforum specifically highlighting analytical testing results as well as a photo gallery doing the same, I'm praising the enormous impact that @janoshik has had on the community, and I'm recommending @janoshik as a way to meet new requirements for participating on MESO.
Yeah, it's weird for me too.
I think I have addressed all I felt the need to be addressed with great fervor, yet respectfully and I assume I might leave it at that.
I agree. Let it rest.I think it's best for us to get the thread back on topic. I can see both @Millard and @janoshik's issues here, and random people chiming in, whether it be to defend one daddy or another, doesn't help with harm reduction. That being said, I'm glad to see a little discourse between them, it's healthy, and it serves as a time waster when ladyboys aren't readily available.