Janoshik Analytical laboratory testing services

[Avies48]

View attachment 294955

Oh boiii here we go!!!!

 

[xeonmasters]

Janoshik, do you listen to Linkin Park? what do you think about Emily Armstrong?

thank you

 

[brutalbuilt]

i been wondering has there been any generic hgh that tested 99% purity with 0 dimer since changing your testing method?

 

[janoshik]

Janoshik, do you listen to Linkin Park? what do you think about Emily Armstrong?

thank you

I listen only to my wife.

i been wondering has there been any generic hgh that tested 99% purity with 0 dimer since changing your testing method?

I can't really tell when I'm being sent a generic and when I'm being sent EU Pharmacopoeia standard / Pharmacy standard / Sample out of pharmacy.

With no label and faked products, how would I know?

We've received EU Pharmacopoeia standard with not label from a client that wanted to test our accuracy.

We've tested 5 samples of GH that were over 99% since we changed our methods.

 

[brutalbuilt]

I listen only to my wife.


I can't really tell when I'm being sent a generic and when I'm being sent EU Pharmacopoeia standard / Pharmacy standard / Sample out of pharmacy.

With no label and faked products, how would I know?

We've received EU Pharmacopoeia standard with not label from a client that wanted to test our accuracy.

We've tested 5 samples of GH that were over 99% since we changed our methods.

i see... how much for you to tell me those 5 sources? haha jk wish it was that easy

but i got some expired norditropin pens i wanna test to see if still good, you can test pens or only gh in vials?

 

[janoshik]

Pens are np, same conditions as vials.

 

[janoshik]

@dirthand I can't post in that section of the forum, but the most commonly found AAS contamination is:
injectables -> degraded hormone, different hormone, or inert cholesterol based substances

orals -> degraded hormone, different hormone, inert fillers

Hope this helps

 

[dirthand]

@dirthand I can't post in that section of the forum, but the most commonly found AAS contamination is:
injectables -> degraded hormone, different hormone, or inert cholesterol based substances

orals -> degraded hormone, different hormone, inert fillers

Hope this helps

Hey man I surely appreciate the response!! Everything helps!! I am just trying to figure out what the difference (safety or quality wise) between aas I make and aas made by other labs or even pharmaceutical companies make.. If the solution is sterile, has the correct concentration and has no detected harmful substances.. I dont see any difference. Would you??

 

[readalot]

Hey man I surely appreciate the response!! Everything helps!! I am just trying to figure out what the difference (safety or quality wise) between aas I make and aas made by other labs or even pharmaceutical companies make.. If the solution is sterile, has the correct concentration and has no detected harmful substances.. I dont see any difference. Would you??

Hey, here's a standard certificate of analysis for Pharma Test ester:

Post in thread 'Source QC and C of A (do you have one?)'

Jan 11, 2024

Could add in a few positive controls with pharma or compounded pharma products although the absolute concentration of impurities will be lower than in the raws obviously.

Ok, I am going to start with the simplest example I could think of that may be of interest to members. Getting a C of A from Pharma isn't as easy as it used to be. This took a little work with persistence. I have sanitized some of the details from this one to protect manufacturer confidential information as per forum Terms and Rules.

This is an FDA approved Testosterone Cypionate product manufactured in...

• readalot

• 

A summary of these tests:

Thread 'Source QC and C of A (do you have one?)'

Oct 19, 2023

Some thoughts/suggestions for discussion after looking around here.

Realistic, overkill, get what you pay for, don't care?

Would like to hear members' thoughts, counterpoints, etc. especially on cost vs quality. The path to quality is known. Will people pay or too much for UGL customers?

=======

Every Source should provide with each shipment ...

1. 3rd party C of A on finished product batch specific to that shipment
- endotoxin screen
- metals with ICP
- purity(ies) / concentration(s) using hplc plus ms (or gcms)

2. C of A for bulk api for each batch (hplc plus ms or gcms)...

• readalot

• 
• 

1. 3rd party C of A on finished product batch specific to that shipment
- endotoxin screen
- metals with ICP
- purity(ies) / concentration(s) using hplc plus ms (or gcms)

Post in thread 'Source QC and C of A (do you have one?)'

Jan 11, 2024

Ok, I am going to start with the simplest example I could think of that may be of interest to members. Getting a C of A from Pharma isn't as easy as it used to be. This took a little work with persistence. I have sanitized some of the details from this one to protect manufacturer confidential information as per forum Terms and Rules.

This is an FDA approved Testosterone Cypionate product manufactured in a large FDA inspected site in Europe operating under USP standards. The manufacturer provides TC to multiple wholesalers who then sell to pharmacies. Will be a decent baseline for...

• readalot

The current challenge is that many of these assays aren't available for testing UGL products because there hasn't been the demand. Yes it's great we have gotten widespread HPLC testing. The testing will continue to evolve as people see the need (or maybe it won't if people don't). See my conversations attached with Jano. I understand people were irritated with me because in their eyes I wasn't taking the lead to coordinate pilot testing for these other assays. At this point the best I can do is try to set up testing for my own pharma gear and support others who may want to test their UGL stuff.

 

[brutalbuilt]

do you honestly think generic hgh thats being sold is real hgh?

theres still some people that believe its not real hgh and its other compounds in there mimicking its side effects...

is there any compounds that can give a false readings when doing purity test for hgh like ghrp or mk677?

 

[janoshik]

theres still some people that believe its not real hgh and its other compounds in there mimicking its side effects...

is there any compounds that can give a false readings when doing purity test for hgh like ghrp or mk677?

No. It's not only impossible, the entire notion is completely insane and anyone who claims such things can be safely disregarded

 

[MyNameIsJeff]

Please squash your beef with theprovider, for old times' sake! Love you both

 

[Sampei]

Please squash your beef with theprovider, for old times' sake! Love you both

there is no real beef in my opinion, Jano test became more accurate and precise and tehprovider didn't like his HGH to come out at 96% with dimer for example and just stopped using Jano and went to labs that provided him with results more in line with what he liked. this is for me the real truth

 

[MyNameIsJeff]

there is no real beef in my opinion, Jano test became more accurate and precise and tehprovider didn't like his HGH to come out at 96% with dimer for example and just stopped using Jano and went to labs that provided him with results more in line with what he liked. this is for me the real truth

We don't know that that is what happened, so let's give everyone the benefit of doubt.
And if there is such a concern about lower purity numbers with the revised testing procedure, then there are still ways around it. Such as, offering a new line that is exclusively tested by Jano, whereas the existing lines continue with Analiza Bialek, thereby maintaining comparability of purity results over time.

 

[Sampei]

We don't know that that is what happened, so let's give everyone the benefit of doubt.
And if there is such a concern about lower purity numbers with the revised testing procedure, then there are still ways around it. Such as, offering a new line that is exclusively tested by Jano, whereas the existing lines continue with Analiza Bialek, thereby maintaining comparability of purity results over time.

he doesn't care, TP is a thing of the past, he has made so much money that I don't understand why he hasn't retire yet xD

 

[Type-IIx]

Hey, here's a standard certificate of analysis for Pharma Test ester:

Post in thread 'Source QC and C of A (do you have one?)'

Jan 11, 2024

Could add in a few positive controls with pharma or compounded pharma products although the absolute concentration of impurities will be lower than in the raws obviously.

Ok, I am going to start with the simplest example I could think of that may be of interest to members. Getting a C of A from Pharma isn't as easy as it used to be. This took a little work with persistence. I have sanitized some of the details from this one to protect manufacturer confidential information as per forum Terms and Rules.

This is an FDA approved Testosterone Cypionate product manufactured in...

• readalot

• 

A summary of these tests:

Thread 'Source QC and C of A (do you have one?)'

Oct 19, 2023

Some thoughts/suggestions for discussion after looking around here.

Realistic, overkill, get what you pay for, don't care?

Would like to hear members' thoughts, counterpoints, etc. especially on cost vs quality. The path to quality is known. Will people pay or too much for UGL customers?

=======

Every Source should provide with each shipment ...

1. 3rd party C of A on finished product batch specific to that shipment
- endotoxin screen
- metals with ICP
- purity(ies) / concentration(s) using hplc plus ms (or gcms)

2. C of A for bulk api for each batch (hplc plus ms or gcms)...

• readalot

• 
• 

Post in thread 'Source QC and C of A (do you have one?)'

Jan 11, 2024

Ok, I am going to start with the simplest example I could think of that may be of interest to members. Getting a C of A from Pharma isn't as easy as it used to be. This took a little work with persistence. I have sanitized some of the details from this one to protect manufacturer confidential information as per forum Terms and Rules.

This is an FDA approved Testosterone Cypionate product manufactured in a large FDA inspected site in Europe operating under USP standards. The manufacturer provides TC to multiple wholesalers who then sell to pharmacies. Will be a decent baseline for...

• readalot

The current challenge is that many of these assays aren't available for testing UGL products because there hasn't been the demand. Yes it's great we have gotten widespread HPLC testing. The testing will continue to evolve as people see the need (or maybe it won't if people don't). See my conversations attached with Jano. I understand people were irritated with me because in their eyes I wasn't taking the lead to coordinate pilot testing for these other assays. At this point the best I can do is try to set up testing for my own pharma gear and support others who may want to test their UGL stuff.

Why heavy metal testing? Jano did that before, it fizzled out when everyone who did it realized that they should have known there'd never be heavy metals in their gear to begin with.