regular
New Member
So regular did you explain to italianhustler that that the whole pedofile thing is out of line too throw a jacket
Like that on some one with out proof? Cause I am all most positive he wouldn't have said that person.
Regards Mr.Bravo
I get along well with IM. I think he gets a kick out of winding people up when he has conflicts with them.
I'm really careful about calling someone a rat or a chomo. I've seen unpleasant things happen to people when those words are spoken.
Well, it's been one of those days regular and I can't fully respond to your post at the moment..
I talked to you once a long time ago but I mostly got to know you through Ben.. I know you're one of the good guys, and in my book, you're right up there with Millard and Mugzy..
What I'll say for now is this was not a reverse scam, I think brutus and I have both made it pretty clear we don't want anything.. Though I agree scams work both ways..
I sent var, anadrol, nolva, and dbol to a third party to labmax after we had questions.. Brutus ran the anadrol, nothing.. Brutus has now been running the var for close to 2 weeks at 80mg/day, nothing.. I was taking up to "150mg" of the Cialis, nothing(yes I've responded to Cialis before).. I ran the nolva and it was not keeping my gyno at bay.
The var and anadrol failed labmax.. The dbol is questionable as it didn't respond under UV.. The nolva tested similar to dbol and was not a nolva pass..
I emailed K 12 days ago, no response to me or brutus..
I also have adex and clomid, obviously haven't tested them but as I hope you can see, I don't have much faith..
We're sending a few samples in for MS on our own dime..
These are the facts as of now..
I really appreciate the warm comments and your confidence in me. I've only had good contact with you too. Ben was one of the earliest friends I made on the boards.
I don't think you guys are running a scam or “reverse scam.” The point I was trying to illustrate is that I don't automatically believe every claim that every client has because I've seen clients make blatantly false claims. I try to look out for everyone and try to find the truth. That's not to say that the problem you're having isn't legitimate. You guys could have received four poor products.
I am very skeptical of using UV light and color changes in a labmax to determine a product's authenticity. Additionally, you're saying a third party conducted the labmax. I have no idea who even conducted the Labmax test or if they are reliable. Estacydata can at least tell you what something is reliably and everyone can see the results. I'd send the products to them instead of an unlicensed lab. If you claim the product was sold as ecstasy, you should be able to get it tested for $40. http://www.ecstasydata.org/send_sample.php
K's var was tested by them and confirmed to be var once before. http://www.ecstasydata.org/results.php?start=0&search_field=all&s=anavar
This is the first complaint like this I've received since joining the staff at AB. You and Brutus know me, you guys could have contacted me at any time and I would have helped you out. I would have responded to this sooner but don't check in here much because I'm really busy. I'll talk to K.
I didn't read all of the posts in this thread but it seemed as if everyone winding each other up was carrying over into K's feedback.
This could have played out diferently. It is completely out of hand.
The only thing we can do it test the product inn question to everyone s satisfaction.
Not much else to say here.
If their products were poor that should be addressed by the vendor. If they test well, no harm no foul, hopefully JB and Brutus will be straight with everyone and say so.
Again regular- you are a person I have quite a bit of respect for- and my respect I have for people I don't really know well is very limited to say the least. I appreciate you taking the time to address me not once, but twice- and botg times with eloquence and respect... Much unlike some of the aforementioned parties I have had less than cordial interactions with. As far as "the boards" my home is here... and I will keep a respectful distance from those who rub me the wrong way.
Wanting someone dead... shit- I wish five people dead on my way to work every day. I didn't actually say it although he served up the mother of all insults to me- had we been in person there would be people in the hospital over it. Just how I grew up. Thanks for not hacking my home network and posting those pics of me raping a unicorn boss! I appreciate it.
My closing argument is that I wouldn't even complain about a steak- just eat the sides and make do... they would probably wipe their ass with it anyway. If I got a bad drink, steak, salad and dessert I would walk out and tell everyone I know to never go there again.
I get the fallibility of my "personal reactions" to compounds. It is what it is- maybe some Ethiopian would have made a swell meal out of that steak. I am sorry that my reaction was unpalatable (to stay with the food puns) to some; for the most part my personality tends to be incompatible with the majority. Again- thanks for coming at me like a man instead of immediately attacking my integrity. I don't want my meal refunded and I will provide mass spec results that will be immediately discredited by those that disagree with my tactics and dispositions. I sleep well at night as long as I don't think you are tracking me down- then it's one eye open time. Until then- I am in no more need of karius or his services... at the very least I know my body chemistry is immune to many of his compounds.
I appreciate your confidence Brutus, I try do do the best I can with the access I have. You should feel free to participate where you want. You're welcome to come over to AB. You're welcome to leave negative feedback too. I've seen IM and Gman get into it with people and wind up being on good terms in the end.
I understand the gravity of calling someone a child molester and I agree that it's not appropriate to make an accusation like that out of spite.
I'm not saying that you're wrong and the products are good. Every source has issues come up, no matter how good their reputation is. This is the first complaint I've seen where someone is dissatisfied with multiple products.
If you want to test the products and post the results, I feel you should send them to estacydata because they are a legitimate lab and everyone will be able to see a photo of both the sample and results.
I don't track everyone down on a whim, someone has to be in debt or doing something pretty bad to get that level of attention. The last person I worked from here was Biologic. Prior to that was an Uncle Z rep.
Like I told JB, you should have contacted me. I would have helped you. I'll talk to K about this.
This isn't a steak you can send back Regular, especially in the case of pct meds turning out to be dbol. When people send out garbage to customers in this realm someone's health can be at risk.
What evidence is being used to determine the product is garbage? Sending product to an unknown person to run a labmax, the results of which I'm not sure that anyone but the person conducting the test has seen, is weak evidence of a product's authenticity. Is the evidence someone's claim that it is poor? Use a real test from a verifiable analytical lab to construct a stronger argument that the product is something other than it should be.
Brutus had a batch tested and K responded by sending some of his own stuff in to test. Find and dandy right? Can you not see where that is a problem? Who is to say that K didn't send his "good" stuff to be tested? Ever hear of selective scamming? Sounds like the banking industry regulating itself, but i'm sure that works fine.
Yes, I'm aware of selective scamming. If K were a selective scammer, I would have received other complaints making that claim before now. I've been at AB for two years and I've never seen an issue like this with K.
Of course the same could be said of Brutus, but i don't really see what he would get out of that. To the best of my knowledge he isn't selling anything. He just wants what he ordered and in the amount he ordered. The person with the most to lose or gain is K.
Anyone can be scamming anyone on either side. I'm not aware of any evidence to suggest either side intends to scam the other though. The product could be poor due to a supply chain or mislabeling issue. Unscientific unverifiable evidence could be leading the clients to believe they have been ripped off when they haven't. Each side can strongly believe they are correct and be dead wrong, while not intentionnaly deceiving the other. Sources can be deleivering what they think is a consistent product but get screwed by their supplier. Send a pill to estacydata and see what's going on. K's var was already tested once and it was var http://www.ecstasydata.org/results.php?start=0&search_field=all&s=anavar
If the product is good, I'm not going to conclude JB and Brutus meant to mislead anyone because I've never seen them be deceptive. If the product tests poorly, people should know about it, but I'm not going to conclude it was intentional ( with that evidence alone ) because the supply chain for these raw materials is complicated.
As to moderated boards and their regulation...well if you are saying they are not skewed towards sources(the people that pay the bills) i think you are being naive at best. Those of us who have been around long enough have seen people burned at the stake for calling out a source on a sponsored board. Posts removed, users banned, tests called into question. On sponsored boards it leans heavily in favor of the sources. Things are swept under the rug. That isn't the case here. I lean in favor of the user unless i have reason to believe otherwise.
Each board has its own politics. Stop hanging out on boards that are scammer havens.
So in the end we have Brutus' word and testing versus K's word. Knowing how things go in this business and what we have seen of late i am going to throw the pitchfork at the source more often than not. What sounds more believable...a source jacking shit up or a member burning someone out of hand? I have run out of fingers to count the sources that have misled customers during my stay here, but can't say i remember a source being called out without justification.
It is unfortunate that there have been so many scammers here. I've run a few of them off of this board and helped many people who were on the verge of losing their money here, ask around.
Take your ass back to AB and peddle your nonsense somewhere they will listen. I hear alin is looking for more "doctors" to write excuses for his shit gear and people's poor bloodwork, perhaps you can try to get a position with his staff.
This is the most ignorant post I've read in a long time. I will not forget you saying this to me.
This is a well thought out and very professional response. I think if IM or Gman had responded like this instead of going on the attack this thread may have turned out differently.
I think IM and Brutus didn't like each other before this thread started. They seem to enjoy antagonizing each other. I didn't really read IM and Gman's posts because there were so many and I'm here because Brutus and JB are having an issue that requires assistance.
The two disagreements I have are:
1 - the analogy is nice, but misleading. Customer service in food service doesn't compare to dbol vs. Nolva.
What evidence is being used to determine the nolva is dbol? A test purchased on the internet, conducted by an unknown party who is relaying his findings to the client. Imagine you're in my shoes, how am I supposed to have confidence in that information? It's a claim that someone else made a claim that something was not authentic. I can't pull the trigger on someone for that. Especially when I'm not seeing other complaints. Maybe the products were mislabeled.
The process is essentially the same as a poor order with any product, food or otherwise. They don't like their order. They should seek a replacement or a refund. If they can't get the issue resolved, they should escalate to management.
2 - your comparison to CoAs used in chemical/scientific fields is good. However, those are batch specific and are available if an issue arises. Where are Ks tests? I read somewhere he allegedly tests his raws, though it was secondhand.
I saw him say he was conducting some tests of his own, I never saw the results though. As I've said a few times, his var, which is being questioned in this thead, has already been tested and confirmed to be var: http://www.ecstasydata.org/results.php?start=0&search_field=all&s=anavar
Some people get certificates of authenticity which they do have on hand. I discourage guys from posting certificates of authenticity. Sometimes the data is in foreign languages and I'm not sure if they contain sensitive information.
To be honest I dont care about any of this beyond the fact that IM and Gman were behaving like shills. I guarantee you Watson and Pfizer and all those other big drug companies have nonconforming product and complaint records about how and when they fucked up. Refusing to admit that K is even capable of a mistake is absurd.
AB doesn't delete or amend feedback. Anyone that wants to see K's track record can look at his feedback thread or ask around. I've been at AB for two years and this is the first strong complaint of multiple products I've run across.
As far as I know, IM and Gman have nothing to do with K's business.
Every vendor has issues come up.