Lab test of primus ray laboratories??

I didn't speak on the quality of PR did I? I said we have a good source that's sells PR
Then again, why do you say the source is good? I assume, by your logic that the source is of good quality.

I'm not blaming you for saying that, I'm just, in all honesty, trying to understand why they are "good".
 
Then again, why do you say the source is good? I assume, by your logic that the source is of good quality.

I'm not blaming you for saying that, I'm just, in all honesty, trying to understand why they are "good".

A good source does not mean good quality. The source has been known to ship quickly and get the items delivered in a timely manner with good communication. Since he is not a manufacturer of Primus Ray, just a reseller, the quality of the product is still in question.
 
A good source does not mean good quality. The source has been known to ship quickly and get the items delivered in a timely manner with good communication. Since he is not a manufacturer of Primus Ray, just a reseller, the quality of the product is still in question.
Well said, thank you sir
 
A good source does not mean good quality. The source has been known to ship quickly and get the items delivered in a timely manner with good communication. Since he is not a manufacturer of Primus Ray, just a reseller, the quality of the product is still in question.
While I understand your point, I can't agree with you.
A source that sells bunk gear, underdosed gear or intentionally any gear that is not what the customer ordered, is definitely not a good source.

Unless the source aknowledges the issues and try to work it out with the customer I believe that the seller/source should be hold responsible for selling bad quality gear. After all, I'm buying from the source and not the manufacturer.

In my opinion, a good source has good quality control over their products along a consistent delivery of well dosed gear.
 
While I understand your point, I can't agree with you.
A source that sells bunk gear, underdosed gear or intentionally any gear that is not what the customer ordered, is definitely not a good source.

Unless the source aknowledges the issues and try to work it out with the customer I believe that the seller/source should be hold responsible for selling bad quality gear. After all, I'm buying from the source and not the manufacturer.

In my opinion, a good source has good quality control over their products along a consistent delivery of well dosed gear.

From my understanding the point Savagesteve was making is that John Evans has not been vetted yet, as opposed to some of the other sources selling the same gear. I have yet to find any blood work on PR which still keeps the quality of the gear in question. If it comes out that the gear is bad and the other source keeps pushing it as quality gear, I would agree that there is some questions to be raised about the source. But seeing as though we cannot verify the efficacy of the gear yet, why risk purchasing from a source that we know nothing about?
 
While I understand your point, I can't agree with you.
A source that sells bunk gear, underdosed gear or intentionally any gear that is not what the customer ordered, is definitely not a good source.

Unless the source aknowledges the issues and try to work it out with the customer I believe that the seller/source should be hold responsible for selling bad quality gear. After all, I'm buying from the source and not the manufacturer.

In my opinion, a good source has good quality control over their products along a consistent delivery of well dosed gear.
I was trying to mak a point without mentioning a source as people need to do their own research. The source I use for PR is good and it doesn't matter what you though I was saying as my source hasn't been selling any bunk gear. Obviously this doesn't go for every source but these couple shitbags trying to sneak in here selling PR when there is a euro source selling it already.
 
I was trying to mak a point without mentioning a source as people need to do their own research. The source I use for PR is good and it doesn't matter what you though I was saying as my source hasn't been selling any bunk gear. Obviously this doesn't go for every source but these couple shitbags trying to sneak in here selling PR when there is a euro source selling it already.

what would be the reliable source? you can tell me in private. thanks




Inviato dal mio iPhone utilizzando Tapatalk
 
Me ?? No I understand.. You cant reading then used goodle trans..

But dont do fucken spam its post about Primus Ray

fucking racist
If you have to use google translator how are you US domestic? GTFO troll
You're An idiot mate. nandro is USA domestic he is based in Wisconsin he carry the best shit outthere. I've ordered 3 times from him and he is a really stand up guy. One day he mistakenly fucked up my order and he reship it and he let me keep what he first send.
 
You're An idiot mate. nandro is USA domestic he is based in Wisconsin he carry the best shit outthere. I've ordered 3 times from him and he is a really stand up guy. One day he mistakenly fucked up my order and he reship it and he let me keep what he first send.
And your basic English is just as shitty as his so fuck off and go join hammer and atlas.
 
Back
Top