Darius, enjoyed your posts and have been following for awhile. I haven't seen it in the threads what testing you guys do on your materials. If not already post, could you please describe them more
thanks
Could you elaborate on your testing and what you found wrong with certain pharmacom products? Because we got the other guy selling directly from the factory saying their testing is flawless
The only lab test I trust is the Mass Spectrometry
, the only real indicator of purity.
I work with a reputable Asian lab used by many manufacturers to test raws.
A confidentiality agreement with Pharmacom won't allow me to make the results public, good or bad, but I can assure you since my reputation is at stake, I would rank Pharmacom amongst top 3 UGLs.
Huge investments made this year in the production line, packaging, anti-counterfeiting would probably lead to the lab being authorized for sale in pharmacies in some small countries, meaning Pharma Grade.
I stopped selling the current batch of Test/Sust 500 due to severe post injections soreness, swellings and fever. Mass Spec showed a good concentration and no impurities.
I don't think there are more than 2-3 UGLs at this moment to really put more than 300mg/1ml of active substance to a 500mg labeled product. Pharmacom does and it's up to 460mg/1ml which is incredible for an UGL.
Most probably the TEST/SUST 500 problems were caused by the lack of up to Ethyl Oleate in the mix. Also, a high dose of Test per ml can cause similar reactions. Unfortunately, it's hard to find such a high concentration per ML from another lab to make a comparison.
Anyway, it was left out from my line due to personal testing made by me and my colleagues and not because of the mass spec which was impressive.
New batch is looking good, soreness is reduced and no other bad reactions. If things are ok I'll have the 500 esters back on sale starting from next month.