@element00 has been a decent member here on Meso and I have no reason to not believe him in his statements. Whether element had a prior agreement upon seizure or not doesn't really matter. His reasons for not excepting the partial refunds doesn't matter to me either. He is a grown man whom stated his position and wants to call it a loss then that's fine with me. He knew what he was getting into and the risks he took and he found out the results and that was that. It does give insight for others that live in his neck of the woods and that's a good thing in my book. Now if he wants this dropped then we should all honor the man and drop it.
@mikestrong if you can't deliver somewhere then I suggest you stay away from trying to deliver there.
I realize several people on this board cherish and praise Mike for such a good job he does and that's fine. He is a stand up guy from my dealings with him but there are bound to be hiccups along the way.
Element thanks for posting your experience with Mike. I know you have your reasons for not taking a refund and I respect you for that.
I wish you both well in your future ventures. Now can we all move on.
Hey BM,
I'm just getting confused as to what element was looking for. I like the guy and I don't fault him at all for posting. It's why we have the forum. What is getting lost in translation is the reasoning behind the post.. If it's to heed those ordering from AU, that's cool, but that was not the tone originally presented. If there was an arrangement that someone renegged on, that's a different story and the communication proving that should be brought forward. Otherwise, this was just a waste of a thread imo