Sk8man101
Well-known Member
All the fuckin time bro.Please tell me you lick that girl in AVI butthole all the time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All the fuckin time bro.Please tell me you lick that girl in AVI butthole all the time.
Haha. You posted at 420.
@CensoredBoardsSuck has already written extensively about this (see link below). It's the usually-expected quid pro quo that is the problem. If you don't provide it, then it's not necessarily a big deal. BUT your credibility in positively reviewing this source is irreversibly tarnished as a result of your decision. And any positive reviews of other sources may be met with suspicion that free samples were also involved. Even negative reviews of other sources may be met with suspicion e.g. was the negative review given just because a free sample wasn't received?So that's why we need to have a good discussion as a community on this question that has just come up, and thanks for your input.
Maybe @CensoredBoardsSuck can chime in on this question and I gladly will await his feedback. Hopefully there will be a clearer agreement on this issue. If I made a serious mistake then my bad, as I had different impression of this rule.
@CensoredBoardsSuck has already written extensively about this (see link below). It's the usually-expected quid pro quo that is the problem. If you don't provide it, then it's not necessarily a big deal. BUT your credibility in positively reviewing this source is irreversibly tarnished as a result of your decision. And any positive reviews of other sources may be met with suspicion that free samples were also involved. Even negative reviews of other sources may be met with suspicion e.g. was the negative review given just because a free sample wasn't received?
See Why You Shouldn't Accept Free Samples From Sources
Accepting free items from any source here regardless of item is looked at negatively here. Your views will be tarnished and every review or critique of sources/members will now be viewed with an extra level of skepticism. For a newer termed member the excuse of ignorance to the rule may be easier to swallow but not for a longer termed member. You should of known better and if you didn't then you have not been paying attention in your years here. I think the stance on free items from sources here is straight forward with no exceptions.So that's why we need to have a good discussion as a community on this question that has just come up, and thanks for your input.
Maybe @CensoredBoardsSuck can chime in on this question and I gladly will await his feedback. Hopefully there will be a clearer agreement on this issue. If I made a serious mistake then my bad, as I had different impression of this rule.
It should be noted that @MindlessWork has done nothing wrong as far as I've seen. He hasn't given any positive reviews. He hasn't done anything in exchange for free samples. And he has fully disclosed his receipt of free samples. He's done everything possible to openly and honestly reveal any conflicts of interest.While some may disagree with me on this I don't see this as a reason to leave Meso but your integrity,reviews, and critique of members and sources will be taken with much more skepticism.
It should be noted that @MindlessWork has done nothing wrong as far as I've seen. He hasn't given any positive reviews. He hasn't done anything in exchange for free samples. And he has fully disclosed his receipt of free samples. He's done everything possible to openly and honestly reveal any conflicts of interest.
But as you've noted, if he wants to provide feedback and reviews about sources here then he has introduced a lot of skepticism even with his disclosure.
OGH playing Devils advocate but if it was anyone else would this even be a topic?No , he just proved that hes a cheapass that doesnt pay for his own gear or AI"s . He wins them in contests (AAS) and asks for freebies (AI) . Draw your own conclusions...
Well to be fair he outed himself by speaking to the source about the samples in the source thread. Pretty difficult for him to not admit later on after it was already known. Now if Mindless offered up the receiving the samples himself without being called out then I would agree that he openly disclosed but that's not the case. I don't think this is a road that the board wants to go down. Are free samples ok as long as when you are caught you admit to everything after the fact?It should be noted that @MindlessWork has done nothing wrong as far as I've seen. He hasn't given any positive reviews. He hasn't done anything in exchange for free samples. And he has fully disclosed his receipt of free samples. He's done everything possible to openly and honestly reveal any conflicts of interest.
But as you've noted, if he wants to provide feedback and reviews about sources here then he has introduced a lot of skepticism even with his disclosure.
I would hope so.OGH playing Devils advocate but if it was anyone else would this even be a topic?
Guess you missed what i was asking OGH not all memebers.I would hope so.
Perhaps but if you want to exclusively speak to him you can use the pm feature. Until then I will reply to any post in any thread that I see fit in the open forum.Guess you missed what i was asking OGH not all memebers.
OGH playing Devils advocate but if it was anyone else would this even be a topic?
Guess you missed what i was asking OGH not all members.
Fill your boots sir...still doesn't answer my question but thxsPerhaps but if you want to exclusively speak to him you can use the pm feature. Until then I will reply to any post in any thread that I see fit in the open forum.