NapsGear Customers Gear Porn

Fuck you gearwhore.
he changed his attitude in the trips thread after he posted a pic and trips complimented him lmao.

he said the methyl in his name is cause he used methyl test then in the opti gh thread he said hes on his first cycle or something. guy is full of shit
 
he changed his attitude in the trips thread after he posted a pic and trips complimented him lmao.

he said the methyl in his name is cause he used methyl test then in the opti gh thread he said hes on his first cycle or something. guy is full of shit
No doubt. Dumb fucker is all over posting stupid irrelevant shit on the Cat Café thread.
 
Neither are you fucking g shill. Here's your deleted post again for everyone to see. What an about face you made after you found out your boyfriend wasn't gong to give you any freebies.

Methyl Mike said:
I understand the collective is very anti-Naps and me personally I kind of get it and I kind of don't.

If it were up to me I would prefer if people commenting were past customers and stop the piling on because it makes us look immature. Vetting of sources yes I get that, protecting people new to the black market is noble. But redundancy is exactly that, it is not progressive it solves/accomplishes nothing.

Why vet sources? Because there is a goal.
Why care about harm reduction? Again, there is something to be achieved.

Piling on one source or.another, over and over again accomplishes what? What is the goal? Can anyone actually tell me what is expected of Naps that he isn't doing?

Mighty Mouse hinted on lack of testing. Is that an issue?

Bbbg hinted at a few issues, I think poor opsec (retaining customer data past the transaction) and generally a lack of desire to solve complaints and a perceived desire to control what people see ie suppression of those who got screwed and were never taken care of. Did I miss something?

If the collective has other, pertinent grievances with Naps advertising here perhaps raise them now. Preferably in a clear, concise manner. From there Naps is free to address them disregard them or whatever. Its his business.

I'm just sick of people going in circles when I know most likely none or very few of them were ever his customers. And yes, there is a difference. With sources there are always good and bad rumors gossip etc but one person's experience does not mean your experience will be the same.

I ordered from.Naps and got what I paid for in timely fashion. I never bought from him again because there's just too many damned choices on his site. Its also too risky receiving mail from (country witheld) for me.

I do not get people and their "gotta have this or that brand and nothing else is good" mentality. I use a ugl, products are good prices are good and I don't have to research current gossip on such and such lab and then decipher who has an agenda etc etc. Its time consuming. For that reason I don't buy from Naps.

I am indifferent. He's a source. No more or less important than any other.

The burnt vial of tren how many years ago now was that? 6? 8?

Just
Woah. I missed that.
 
Once I ignored both the shills and unfollowed this thread it annoyed me a lot less.
Ah but for the greater good

######FUCK NAPS DO NOT TRUST THIS SOURCE######
In case you all need to see what a source dick sucker looks like, this fucking inbred cuck said this about Naps, NAPS OF ALL PLACES.


Methyl Mike said:
I understand the collective is very anti-Naps and me personally I kind of get it and I kind of don't.

If it were up to me I would prefer if people commenting were past customers and stop the piling on because it makes us look immature. Vetting of sources yes I get that, protecting people new to the black market is noble. But redundancy is exactly that, it is not progressive it solves/accomplishes nothing.

Why vet sources? Because there is a goal.
Why care about harm reduction? Again, there is something to be achieved.

Piling on one source or.another, over and over again accomplishes what? What is the goal? Can anyone actually tell me what is expected of Naps that he isn't doing?

Mighty Mouse hinted on lack of testing. Is that an issue?

Bbbg hinted at a few issues, I think poor opsec (retaining customer data past the transaction) and generally a lack of desire to solve complaints and a perceived desire to control what people see ie suppression of those who got screwed and were never taken care of. Did I miss something?

If the collective has other, pertinent grievances with Naps advertising here perhaps raise them now. Preferably in a clear, concise manner. From there Naps is free to address them disregard them or whatever. Its his business.

I'm just sick of people going in circles when I know most likely none or very few of them were ever his customers. And yes, there is a difference. With sources there are always good and bad rumors gossip etc but one person's experience does not mean your experience will be the same.

I ordered from.Naps and got what I paid for in timely fashion. I never bought from him again because there's just too many damned choices on his site. Its also too risky receiving mail from (country witheld) for me.

I do not get people and their "gotta have this or that brand and nothing else is good" mentality. I use a ugl, products are good prices are good and I don't have to research current gossip on such and such lab and then decipher who has an agenda etc etc. Its time consuming. For that reason I don't buy from Naps.

I am indifferent. He's a source. No more or less important than any other.

The burnt vial of tren how many years ago now was that? 6? 8?

Just

Like Quote Reply
 
Neither are you fucking g shill. Here's your deleted post again for everyone to see. What an about face you made after you found out your boyfriend wasn't gong to give you any freebies.

Methyl Mike said:
I understand the collective is very anti-Naps and me personally I kind of get it and I kind of don't.

If it were up to me I would prefer if people commenting were past customers and stop the piling on because it makes us look immature. Vetting of sources yes I get that, protecting people new to the black market is noble. But redundancy is exactly that, it is not progressive it solves/accomplishes nothing.

Why vet sources? Because there is a goal.
Why care about harm reduction? Again, there is something to be achieved.

Piling on one source or.another, over and over again accomplishes what? What is the goal? Can anyone actually tell me what is expected of Naps that he isn't doing?

Mighty Mouse hinted on lack of testing. Is that an issue?

Bbbg hinted at a few issues, I think poor opsec (retaining customer data past the transaction) and generally a lack of desire to solve complaints and a perceived desire to control what people see ie suppression of those who got screwed and were never taken care of. Did I miss something?

If the collective has other, pertinent grievances with Naps advertising here perhaps raise them now. Preferably in a clear, concise manner. From there Naps is free to address them disregard them or whatever. Its his business.

I'm just sick of people going in circles when I know most likely none or very few of them were ever his customers. And yes, there is a difference. With sources there are always good and bad rumors gossip etc but one person's experience does not mean your experience will be the same.

I ordered from.Naps and got what I paid for in timely fashion. I never bought from him again because there's just too many damned choices on his site. Its also too risky receiving mail from (country witheld) for me.

I do not get people and their "gotta have this or that brand and nothing else is good" mentality. I use a ugl, products are good prices are good and I don't have to research current gossip on such and such lab and then decipher who has an agenda etc etc. Its time consuming. For that reason I don't buy from Naps.

I am indifferent. He's a source. No more or less important than any other.

The burnt vial of tren how many years ago now was that? 6? 8?

Just

103% agree! As most of your post I agree with! We have become lazy as mesonites in vetting these sources…. But meso has put out some
Of the beat sources on the boards and we have uncovered some of the worst sources on the board!!

Fact that other boards look at meso to find out if their sponsors are shit sources should say something!! Millard has put together the best social body building gear board on the net. We hold it to ourselves as members of this forum to uphold that and hold these sources to a standard!

Fact- a source will make more money on this forum vs any other forum if they follow our protocol.

We are neady bitches some have high estro because most sources can’t mix an Adex pill to save their first born! Thanks to the pharmacist we have pharmacy shit who might I add followed our protocol when he came aboard.

These shit sources need to be banished if they can’t follow the MEMBERS NEEDS. They are the guest we are the residents I’ll be damned if we let them run us over!!!!!
 
In case you all need to see what a source dick sucker looks like, this fucking inbred cuck said this about Naps, NAPS OF ALL PLACES.


Methyl Mike said:
I understand the collective is very anti-Naps and me personally I kind of get it and I kind of don't.

If it were up to me I would prefer if people commenting were past customers and stop the piling on because it makes us look immature. Vetting of sources yes I get that, protecting people new to the black market is noble. But redundancy is exactly that, it is not progressive it solves/accomplishes nothing.

Why vet sources? Because there is a goal.
Why care about harm reduction? Again, there is something to be achieved.

Piling on one source or.another, over and over again accomplishes what? What is the goal? Can anyone actually tell me what is expected of Naps that he isn't doing?

Mighty Mouse hinted on lack of testing. Is that an issue?

Bbbg hinted at a few issues, I think poor opsec (retaining customer data past the transaction) and generally a lack of desire to solve complaints and a perceived desire to control what people see ie suppression of those who got screwed and were never taken care of. Did I miss something?

If the collective has other, pertinent grievances with Naps advertising here perhaps raise them now. Preferably in a clear, concise manner. From there Naps is free to address them disregard them or whatever. Its his business.

I'm just sick of people going in circles when I know most likely none or very few of them were ever his customers. And yes, there is a difference. With sources there are always good and bad rumors gossip etc but one person's experience does not mean your experience will be the same.

I ordered from.Naps and got what I paid for in timely fashion. I never bought from him again because there's just too many damned choices on his site. Its also too risky receiving mail from (country witheld) for me.

I do not get people and their "gotta have this or that brand and nothing else is good" mentality. I use a ugl, products are good prices are good and I don't have to research current gossip on such and such lab and then decipher who has an agenda etc etc. Its time consuming. For that reason I don't buy from Naps.

I am indifferent. He's a source. No more or less important than any other.

The burnt vial of tren how many years ago now was that? 6? 8?

Just

Like Quote Reply
I also deleted that post within 20 seconds but naps jumped on it like you on a fat bitch
 
he changed his attitude in the trips thread after he posted a pic and trips complimented him lmao.

he said the methyl in his name is cause he used methyl test then in the opti gh thread he said hes on his first cycle or something. guy is full of shit
You suck at reading. I said no such thing. You are a troll and going to join a few other meso standouts. Bye.
 
Back
Top