napsgear.org

As I said the questions have been forwarded to the lab.

The insane part is that I'm nothing compared to the whole UG market that does not practically put any effort into testing at all. We do!

We have a good lab in China and in EU where we have always been testing the raws at. Meso will be testing there soon as well. Body Of Science has released the Underground ANABOLICS book testing in this lab too. Still my reports from these labs have been questioned by members here so I decided may be I could find a better place with more detailed reports. That was a mistake. Any report I post will be questioned so I will stop here and return to EU and previous Chinese lab. In fact, the "Chinese lab" is a branch of the USA based laboratory. It's a big name in the States as well and there are not many branches of US labs in China. Anyone can guess the name, I won't post it here. So any questions you will have towards future reports I will still forward them and try to get the best answer for you since I'm not a chemist. But there is nothing I can do to the lab if you don't like the "retention time" or similar details.

Merry Christmas, boys and girls! May the Love and Peace of Christmas surround you always.
China falsifies and fabricates reports better than anyone.

Merry Xmas to you and yours as well
 
As I said the questions have been forwarded to the lab.

The insane part is that I'm nothing compared to the whole UG market that does not practically put any effort into testing at all. We do!

We have a good lab in China and in EU where we have always been testing the raws at. Meso will be testing there soon as well. Body Of Science has released the Underground ANABOLICS book testing in this lab too. Still my reports from these labs have been questioned by members here so I decided may be I could find a better place with more detailed reports. That was a mistake. Any report I post will be questioned so I will stop here and return to EU and previous Chinese lab. In fact, the "Chinese lab" is a branch of the USA based laboratory. It's a big name in the States as well and there are not many branches of US labs in China. Anyone can guess the name, I won't post it here. So any questions you will have towards future reports I will still forward them and try to get the best answer for you since I'm not a chemist. But there is nothing I can do to the lab if you don't like the "retention time" or similar details.

Merry Christmas, boys and girls! May the Love and Peace of Christmas surround you always.

Well unfortunately you "forwarded my questions to the lab" also yet NO plausible explanation was rendered for ANY.

I mean I gave you and your "lab" close to 13 questions to choose from and your lab couldn't even ANSWER ONE!

Look who cares what other "labs do" bc they are NOT relevant to this discussion, only NAPS is!

And if you believe the posting of bogus (or otherwise unexplained) MS and/or HPLC implies NAPS is somehow better or above reproach compared to the "other guys", try again fella!

You guys have been around quite a while and carry a name many recognize and believe represents a UGL that sells, quality products (esp the resale items). (I may eat those words bc Naps test results won't be known or posted until around Jan 15th)

So it's a damn shame you folks aren't leading the pack and SETTING an EXAMPLE for other labs to follow.

Naps most certainly is in a position to do that, and this is your chance to lead rather than follow, bc I WILL POST ALL THE HPLC ANALYTICAL DATA OBTAINED WHETHER GOOD OR BAD!

Finally I would like nothing more than for some UGL to overtly demonstrate a willingness to declare an benchmark that other UGLs should follow and cease screwing mates just bc they can.


Best said NAPS LEAD BY EXAMPLE!

Merry Christmas to all!

Regs
Jim
 
Last edited:
Angus is not accredited and certified lab so he can be taken only half seriously.

You're pulling rabbits out of hats so how seriously should we take you?

I have already explained this you posted lab results of powder and attached it to a oil. It was not oil test but powder test.

It was oil. There was nothing in Naps' test to suggest it was powder. NOTHING

And this was in question.

No it wasn't.

There were also some information missing which put the validity of test into question.

No shit. The same information was missing from One Pharma's test but you said that one was GTG.

The other one of pure powder was more realistic and he had also some supporting data like previous blood test so I could believe that it was for real.

It was no more realistic than Naps. Naps ALSO has supporting blood work but you're ignoring that little fact. I wonder why...
 
You're pulling rabbits out of hats so how seriously should we take you?



It was oil. There was nothing in Naps' test to suggest it was powder. NOTHING



No it wasn't.



No shit. The same information was missing from One Pharma's test but you said that one was GTG.



It was no more realistic than Naps. Naps ALSO has supporting blood work but you're ignoring that little fact. I wonder why...
I bet mercury tried to get naps to carry labmax kits and was salivating at the prospect of that giant, ongoing commission check.
Alas, naps said no and this is how @mercury deals with rejection and failure.
 
I don't know if this is helpful or not, but I noticed the naps label. Ijust pinned some of there test e and my leg feels like a pissed of horse kicked it
 
I pinned almost the center of my thigh, actually it was a little more towards the knee but not much. I know I sound like a puss but this is a bitch
 
I'm hoping it was bad technique and not bad gear

Definitely could be technique. The glute is more forgiving but still gets sore if you move the pin around to much.
Just hang in there and you'll get better at it.
As long as your leg doesn't swell up, get all red, warm to the touch then you'll be fine.
 
Ya I was rushing it a little, wanted to get my first cycle goin. I'll keep my hands more steady for next pin. And get some filters thanx for the advice boiler
 

Sponsors

Back
Top