Raider72
New Member
interesting the source has not responded to any of this? a Test only source would be great idea.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
One Pharma: Bulk Cyp
- Thread starter One Pharma
- Start date
I had high hopes for One Pharma , cheap , consistant test-cyp would be valuable to us TRT"ers.....
Raider72
New Member
i agree!! 100% needed. if a source could just focus on Test & put out a great product/service, bam!
Mr. Deltoid
New Member
That's why I've been watching this thread closely from the start I pulled the trigger hopefully it works out I plan on using for my cruise when I finish the blast I'm on of ganabols gear. I'll keep everyone posted I plan on labmax as soon as I receive but that will just confirm if it's test c.
ruckin
Well-known Member
Cool I'm glad to see someone's gonna be trying his stuff out already. Are you planning on getting bloods done too?
The ol' fingers in the ears trick, eh? Sometimes silence says more than words.
Mr. Deltoid
New Member
I do plan on getting bloods done but I still have 6wks left on my blast so it will be a while before I do.
One Pharma
New Member
damn. Iv'e learned a lot just in these last few pages. I am no Analytical chemic
I have no input. I am not an analytical chemist and will not state claims not backed with evidence. Myth is well respected here and I trust him. Mass specs are Damn hard to find and there always seems to be differing oppinions. I trust the numbers posted.
I have no input. I am not an analytical chemist and will not state claims not backed with evidence. Myth is well respected here and I trust him. Mass specs are Damn hard to find and there always seems to be differing oppinions. I trust the numbers posted.
One Pharma
New Member
That is exactly what I am trying to do.
Raider72
New Member
Hope it works out!
EVERYONE should look to the right side of the graphs Myth posted. You will see it plain as day, WATERS TOS MS. Now that means UNEQUIVOCALLY these 2-3 "chromatographs" were generated with a MS fellas. Moreover if you know a little about electronic equipment you know creating ARTIFACT is often relatively EASY and MS is no different.
So what do you think "they" used to create those sloping LC look alike peaks on a MS which they call a CHROMATOGRAPH? It's done by carefully varying the MS injection speed of the solvent CHCL3 (Chloroform)!
IT WAS DELIBERATE AND PREMEDITATED DECEPTION FELLAS. LOOKING BACK THIS HAD BEEN USED SEVERAL TIMES BEFORE.
I would only hope Myth will return to explain this crap but something tells me that won't happen!
Oh yea Dr Jim is an "idiot and is FOS", LOL!
Last edited:
Fuck it I will order a j6g after Christmas when I have some extra cash and do the blood work so we can put an end to this.
hotdog23
New Member
Those 100ml jugs ARE frikkin sexy
A MS is not the ISSUE HERE fella. What IS AT ISSUE is the purity data Myth posted that you cling to for sales.
So don't quote some garbage about evidence when it's clear as day the purity posted was generated using a MS ALONE. Oh yea it's "evidence" all right, FABRICATED EVIDENCE.
You would be wise to learn a lot more about what your supporting before doing so!
Bc the fact is I've asked for ANY scientific proof the purity crap Angus and Myth have posted several times previously is evidence based, AND it clearly is not, but rather concocted BULLSHIT adjusted to meet the needs of THEIR "MS" customers!!!
Great avatar Raider ~Ogh
Marcus
New Member
Dr Jim, you suggesting that myth and angus just fabricate their mass specs out of thin air for the sheer purpose of selling their lab testing?
Raider72
New Member
thank you
Read my earlier post! They are using a MS to FABRICATE CHROMATOGRAPHY DATA, and that Chromo data is what this "purity data" is based on!
Remember an MS ONLY identifies a substances molecular weight period! It can NOT be used to obtain concentration or purity data ALONE!
So "they" used an MS to fabricate peaks similar to HPLC and then LABELED IT AS A "CHROMATOGRAPH". That is what was then used as justification for the "purity data" they have posted.
Remember an MS ONLY identifies a substances molecular weight period! It can NOT be used to obtain concentration or purity data ALONE!
So "they" used an MS to fabricate peaks similar to HPLC and then LABELED IT AS A "CHROMATOGRAPH". That is what was then used as justification for the "purity data" they have posted.
Last edited:
Raider72
New Member
that was what i was wondering, or just ignorant mistake? doesn't change the outcome but certainly the motive
Marcus
New Member
Maybe my question was worded wrong... I don't know a lot about this equipment. Can this kind of mistake be made on accident? Or are they doing it on purpose should have been my question
Similar threads
