Where the hell are the moderators of this Forum????
What can I do you for?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where the hell are the moderators of this Forum????
As I look at your username, it fits you perfect.
Impulse: a sudden strong and unreflective urge or desire to act.
666....psst...please!
You should be called "Pretty Princess Pegasus". Why? Because you don't know shit. You expect to be spoon fed info, instead of doing proper research. Then just like a brat you want sympathy when shit doesn't go your way. Impulse fit you perfectly
So scream your little heart out for a moderator to help you....I'm listening.
Meso is not for you.."Bye felicia"
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
So, there's no moderator tag, no moderators list, all hidden, I guess that's on purpose. Perhaps to let guys like these ruin threads without getting bashed for letting it happen? I mean, tell me you're not on their side?What can I do you for?
Even though I agree with your wise words, I do believe that's a VERY poor excuse to this forum being "unmoderated".Yeah let's get this thread back on track. If you're gonna bitch or argue to someone else make a separate thread or do it in a pm.
I'm sure we'd get much quicker responses from pharmacom if they didn't have to filter the bullshit posts considering how rare it is to see Frank post on here.
We've all share a common interest and we're all here for the same thing.
This is an unmoderated forum because they expect that if you're old enough to be using aas, you should be old enough to control your temper and not feed into the childish members who always want something to argue about and don't contribute to the safety of the community.
I think I speak for everyone here.
Yeah let's get this thread back on track. If you're gonna bitch or argue to someone else make a separate thread or do it in a pm.
I'm sure we'd get much quicker responses from pharmacom if they didn't have to filter the bullshit posts considering how rare it is to see Frank post on here.
We've all share a common interest and we're all here for the same thing.
This is an unmoderated forum because they expect that if you're old enough to be using aas, you should be old enough to control your temper and not feed into the childish members who always want something to argue about and don't contribute to the safety of the community.
I think I speak for everyone here.
Nice contribution. This post is gonna help us get to the bottom of things"We've all share a common interest and we're all here for the same thing"
Curious what the "common interest" is and what "we're" all here for, considering most in this thread and those agreeing with you mostly if not only, post in Pcom related threads.
Those "childish" members you speak of, have and will continue to contribute more than I've seen you or the others the agree with this statement contribute. Maybe if some of the "non-childish" members would get out of the Pcom threads, you'd see the members here that actually contribute something of value, other than my pack arrived and the dbol is fire BS.
Ya great point, I have thought of this as wellBesides, regarding the batch number, once a specific batch number (say batch # GYR565LL) is "established" as being tested and properly dosed, would it not benefit a UGL to reuse that batch number over and over, with the fallback response being "batch # GYR565LL has already been tested and been proven to be dosed properly".
Nice contribution. This post is gonna help us get to the bottom of things
I dont know how they do it but Ive read some ugl use a batch number for the entire supply of raws not just a small batch of said product. Meaning, if they order a large quantity of raws(which is most likely the case), then their dbol could potentially have the same batch number for a very long time(until the raws run out). So saying this, batch numbers really dont mean anything because if this is the case different batches could have different results because of all the different variables that come into effect when producing a batch.Mine was the same batch of the AL test.
def. the best absorption lolActually for you, it probably be better if you used your prison wallet. GAINZ!
Pharmacom claims this is what they do if I remember correctly.I dont know how they do it but Ive read some ugl use a batch number for the entire supply of raws not just a small batch of said product. Meaning, if they order a large quantity of raws(which is most likely the case), then their dbol could potentially have the same batch number for a very long time(until the raws run out). So saying this, batch numbers really dont mean anything because if this is the case different batches could have different results because of all the different variables that come into effect when producing a batch.
No way to verify though...Pharmacom claims this is what they do if I remember correctly.
So you you want to bitch about the forum not having mods but the only...only damn place you've ever posted is pharmacoms threads...get your shill fagot ass out of here!Even though I agree with your wise words, I do believe that's a VERY poor excuse to this forum being "unmoderated".
Still, you are right, lets just get back on track and stop with the drama please.
a good point was made about the hardness of the tabs. @Docd187123 you don't think it's possible for tab to pass through unabsorbed?
LolTablets aren't sweetcorn.
First gaylord, I would like for you to explain me why you are calling me a "shill", for waiting this thread back on track?So you you want to bitch about the forum not having mods but the only...only damn place you've ever posted is pharmacoms threads...get your shill fagot ass out of here!