Did you pay the customer back his money and replace his order yet?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here is I need check because Frank talked with him not meDid you pay the customer back his money and replace his order yet?
That's funny been told this many times in the past. Call it a coincidence but every time the person was either a liar or a fake in life. Go figure.....he is still an asshole but yea he is looking out
The $500.00 question is why would you spend $500.00 on the test instead of just sending out a few vials of NPP? I understand you can't just do it for everyone, but then again if PCom is so good, you shouldn't have to worry about this problem with everyone correct?
You can try to twist this anyway you want, the facts are the customer paid and you could have fixed this much cheaper and faster!
@Mr.B66 No disrespect meant to anyone. As I am. I agree 100%, my point is 16 weeks might be a bit to long don't ya think? We don't send every vial to Simec to test. These vials could have already been replaced. The vials in question are at Simec, have been for 16 weeks. He will not get those vials back correct? Good or bad, he will not get those vials back. Maybe I'm wrong? If I am than all do apologies sir.
Are we even speaking about the same thing? This isn't about underdosed vials. And if he was a reverse scammer have you ever seen anyone pay $500.00 out of pocket to scam for 2 vials of NPP? The product wasn't used, it looked crashed, or something.
Your question is rhetorical, correct? Has to be. You people come off as if you've seen and done it all. I've read posts where members have offered suggestions in regards to how they thought the pharmacom experience could be improved. You guys have an answer for everything and make it clear that your customers aren't very worldly and that if they were indeed bright it would be obvious that pharmacom is as close to perfect as anyone will ever get and that they are fortunate to be getting anything at all from this company.And if Simec have some delays - PC is blame in this I think next time I will see a comment like "My wife is cheating on me and you all know who is blame"
Now seriously:
As I know Simec is the option for verifying of issues. If your car has broken - do you go to seller for replacement ? I think first of all you need some proofs that car really broken. (real proofs, not just words that the car doesn't move)
Here is same situation. I don't know exactly situation with Simec, but I never saw other labs who can do analysis like Simec.
Someone know other sources ?
And I agree with you but in this business it's impossible to return something. (and I realize that return something "bad" to the manufacturer is the best option)
Diagnostics is still actual in warranty return case for repair/replacement but in case of automotive industry it will be done by seller - in our case it's impossible.
Could honestly just be different batches of oil man or an age difference. Lots of reasons for color to be different. I wouldn't worry about it just based on the color...you know unless it's bright ass green or some shit.also the one that is completely clear, the code DID check out on the website....BUT it was also the only one out of them that didn't have another silver scratchable thing on it (there were two scratchable codes on the other three bottles, only one on the clear bottle).
At first there was excitement when the package came.....now I am noticing that one of these test C's is completely clear compared to the other three.....WTF, I don't care if its just one bottle underdosed I am pissed. What are your thoughts guys could it be legit? I don't even want to scratch the other 3 codes before I decide what action to take. Also the one that is completely clear, the code DID check out on the website....BUT it was also the only one out of them that didn't have another silver scratchable thing on it (there were two scratchable codes on the other three bottles, only one on the clear bottle).
yes, all same expiration date I just looked. Makes it even more fishy? like they just threw in one fake out of three like i wouldn't notice on the whole cycle I guess i can see when i run it, has anyone else seen this though?
Is this from Frank or Darius?At first there was excitement when the package came.....now I am noticing that one of these test C's is completely clear compared to the other three.....WTF, I don't care if its just one bottle underdosed I am pissed. What are your thoughts guys could it be legit? I don't even want to scratch the other 3 codes before I decide what action to take. Also the one that is completely clear, the code DID check out on the website....BUT it was also the only one out of them that didn't have another silver scratchable thing on it (there were two scratchable codes on the other three bottles, only one on the clear bottle).
From the official basicste site..So I guess that would be frank from all that ive read around hereIs this from Frank or Darius?
If it's bunk. But according to @karakot thread, his was fine.will they replace my clear vial you think?
will they replace my clear vial you think?