Please provide scientific evidence correlating igf-1 score (or any blood markers of your choice) and any qualitative markers of your choice for exogenous HGH - Qomatropin certainly scored higher in purity than the majority of famous pharma HGH labtested by Janoshik, albeit not all, but you can find results here:
At
best there's a correlation between quantity/units of HGH taken and igf-1 and this longstanding confusion of quantity and quality (and thatmore side effects = better quality shared with tren cough) has pushed most generic HGH manufacturers as well as sellers of these finished kits to market 120iu kits as 100iu (overdosed Meditrope batches perhaps being the most extreme example) and use other strategies to feed into the boomer broscience of high blood markers = high quality because that's what sells, while actual markers of HGH quality as per pharmacopeia such as purity get pushed to the side. I understand that testing and evaluating HGH properly requires more effort and money but evaluating HGH by bloods is like evaluating your gear via roidtest kit, and we aren't doing that anymore either.
Alarming but not surprising…I can only imagine at 400mg/ml. Never thought I would run out of my own stuff, however, Pharmaqo is serving a short gap. Good bang for your buck, comparatively speaking but I will say this 400mg hodgepodge has THEE worst pip out of anything I’ve tried, ever.
