Why would I need to point you to an article to clarify my statement. There are numerous drugs beyond gh that "help" reduce body fat % and or preserve muscle when in a caloric deficit. Or is it your statement that GH alone is the only drug that will reduce body fat%? If you need more information on diet and weight loss then please check out the nutrition sub forum as well as the steroid sub forum. It's amazing the stuff you can learn when you step out of this thread.
I never said any such thing (GH is the only product to promote / lose BF) . I simply asked you to clarify and support you assertion.
You jumped into the middle of a conversation on HGH results / sides with the following statement
" Or jump to another source who's gear is as advertised and watch the fat melt off of you"
The reasonable interperation of that statement by any measure is:
1/ You are discrediting the product that the conversation was referring to
2/ You are implying that far better results can be had by switching to an alternative source.
I simply asked for clarification of the claims you were making. I'm surprised by you response to be honest. I suspect there are many on the forum who would similarly love to "watch the fat melt off" and would like to know more
At the moment it feels like you just made a exaggerated claim that you can't support. Happy to be proved wrong on this point , however, that claim raised two concerns for me
1/ It might prompt members to switch product , spend more money for no actual benefit leading to a uncessary financial loss
2/ It might lead some members to unnecessarily upping their dose in the belief that the product they are using is weak or under-dosed as they cannot
see the fat melting off.
The second in particular causes concern as it may lead to somebody taking a much larger dose than required (as they believe from your statement that their produce is much weaker than it should be) and placing additional avoidable risks on their health.
Given that this board is founded on Harm Reduction - I do feel that claims of "super results " or "under-dosing" by a member need to be challenged just as much as a source claiming strenght or potency. We need to hold ourselves to the same standards otherwise our challenge in general loses credibility as does the claim of Harm Reduction