Pharmasource EU pharmaceuticals

Guys, Its impossible to have 400mm-ml , in real, content could be around 370|38O mg. No one test is 100% and if test have 5% mistake ( what for sure have ) dosing is 10% overdosed, and this is exactkly what PS oils are, were and will be .
Must check boldenon content, but 7% looking like some residuum in filling machine
Why do you always act like the testing mistake is working in your favour ... shit it could even content more test
 
Why do you always act like the testing mistake is working in your favour ... shit it could even content more test

Cant. If amout of RAW powder is counted for amout of finished vials, its impossible. What I know, last batch was used 5kilo of RAW and we had 680 finished vials. from 400mg should be 625vials
 
would make sense to test any new batches before they're added to the price list. im sure people would bemore than happy to buy test e 400 but especially when people use it for trt its of paramount importance to know how much youre taking, a 25% discrepancy is huge and could be easily avoided with a simple test upon manufacture

50 mg more, on a product labelled 350 mg , is not 25 % more, but only 14.3 % more. Considering that in Europe the laws allow a margin of error between +/- 10%, on a pharma grade products, 14.3 more on a ugl isn’t a serious mistake
 
So would you be so kind and post your test results for the raws?

We are not testing every batch of raws, we have many years the same raw source and raw tests were posted somewhere in past. Only for your info, some of results were MORE like 100%, how is this possible ? Simply, because tests are NeWER 100%, what I know from Chemtox lab, they have quaranteed 5% mistake.
 
If you check the price list most of the PS orals and vials are overdosed. It's not a big surprise to me to see this test but I'm just very happy it is test and not deca lol. In a perfect world sure I would love 100% accuracy but at the end of the day it is a ugl so unless you have the funds to stay with strictly pharm grade I wouldn't bitch. Prices are already super low to begin with.
 
I was not posting this for everyone to rain hell down, I was posting this as information, to help people.
Thanks for your contribution. While it isn’t intended for people to raise hell about, it does require some attention. I run the cyp so the dosage on the enanthate doesn’t bother me as bad as having eq in the test (although a very minimal amount)
 
We are not testing every batch of raws,
Why though?
I understand you’re not putting fancy labels on and trying to cut costs as much as possible. Testing your raws only benefits your brand (and customers.)

Correct me if I’m wrong here but if you didn’t have to overdose every batch by 10% wouldn’t that extra 10% you’re using to overdose, produce extra vials? Those few extra vials (after sold) would pay for that testing...

If this product came back under dosed at 300mg/ml I guarantee people wouldn’t be so forgiving, which doesn’t make sense to me. It’s bound to happen when guess work is involved when brewing.

As far as another compound being in the vial I believe that is pure fuckin laziness on the brewer part! No excuse for that to happen!

@Small_guy83 your testing contribution is appreciated man. It’s just brought a discussion out is all.
For the record I’ve had great experiences with some of the products from PS.
 
@pharmasource whats the expiration date on the Anadrol that’s on sale? Are they going to expire or already expired?

The extra milligram I see it as...it’s better to bring her more than not enough ;)
 
50 mg more, on a product labelled 350 mg , is not 25 % more, but only 14.3 % more. Considering that in Europe the laws allow a margin of error between +/- 10%, on a pharma grade products, 14.3 more on a ugl isn’t a serious mistake
ahh yeah sorry i didnt pay attention and misread as test e 300 :)
 
Back
Top