Pristine Anabolics Intro

Expecting these results any day now. I actually sent in finished sust, finished EQ, and raw drol. I feel like getting finished tested is better for the end user, that way you know exactly what you're getting with that specific batch. I'm gonna be sending in a mixture of finished and raws. If my finished tests come back off, I can pull that product and get the raws tested to see if something is up there. I know some will disagree with this methodology but I believe it's the best way to move forward with quality assurance.

Good to here man. Whatever methods you have that can provide reliable tests on your products are great. I agree a mixture or Raws and finished makes sense.
So is Tren a going out going to be Tren a raw or finished? If finished what batch?
 
@Trenity if you don’t mind me commenting, I believe your testing should focus on CURRENT finished product batches, and NEW raws as they’re received. As those new raws are brewed, send out NEW finished product batches for testing.

Maybe that’s exactly what you’re doing. But the methodology there should be sound and give guys confidence.
 
I don’t see a problem with sending in finished oils, as long as they are the current batch being sold. You’d essentially be determining what concentration the gear is to the end user.

From a manufacturing standpoint, that accounts for real world variability. The raws could be to an acceptable purity, but then there could be an error during the brewing process.

Personally I’m most concerned that the concentration of the finished compound I’m injecting is correct. If the raws were of subpar purity, that would be caught in the finished product.
 
I don’t see a problem with sending in finished oils, as long as they are the current batch being sold. You’d essentially be determining what concentration the gear is to the end user.

From a manufacturing standpoint, that accounts for real world variability. The raws could be to an acceptable purity, but then there could be an error during the brewing process.

Personally I’m most concerned that the concentration of the finished compound I’m injecting is correct. If the raws were of subpar purity, that would be caught in the finished product.
Except you have no idea what the impurities are. Not hard to dose 75% Pure raws appropriately but have it slowly kill you.
 
Except you have no idea what the impurities are. Not hard to dose 75% Pure raws appropriately but have it slowly kill you.

Should still show up in the finished test. If the chemist is competent, they should be able to tell you what’s inside the oil technically.

I mean finished testing was the only way Boldenone was actually caught. It ended up being brewing error versus raw purity
 
Should still show up in the finished test. If the chemist is competent, they should be able to tell you what’s inside the oil technically.

I mean finished testing was the only way Boldenone was actually caught. It ended up being brewing error versus raw purity

Or I’d hope it would show up in finished testing. Although we’re not exactly using QA from a pharmaceutical company
 
This is the answer from Jano. So pretty much no unless it’s Test E or Tren Degrading. Still awaiting an answer from W&M.

I don’t really like the part where it says “what if the impurity came from the oil itself?”

I hope our oil is sterile lol

“Imo it's not possible from the nature of the logic involved, unless impurities are well defined such as in the case of GH / peptides.

If you have heptanoic acid in oil, or some fatty esters of something, how can you tell it comes from the raw or the oil itself? Because both sources are possible.

Now, if you see degradation products of tren in the oil, it's fairly obvious, but still, I tend to avoid anything that can be harder to interpret - because somebody somewhere will always interpret it wrong.

With test e it could be possible, but with much less sensitivity than with raw powder.

IE 1% impurities would show easily if raw powder was tested straight away, but they might go completely undetected in oil. I lack a good metaphor right now.”
 
>I don’t really like the part where it says “what if the impurity came from the oil itself?”

I mean, if the raw powder is cut / contains impurity that might naturally contain or form in oils as well, how would you determine it's origin?

I know of a few ways, but ain't nobody keen on paying the extra buck for that imo.

I'm just a big fan of keeping things simple for the sake of everybody.
 
>I don’t really like the part where it says “what if the impurity came from the oil itself?”

I mean, if the raw powder is cut / contains impurity that might naturally contain or form in oils as well, how would you determine it's origin?

I know of a few ways, but ain't nobody keen on paying the extra buck for that imo.

I'm just a big fan of keeping things simple for the sake of everybody.

That wasn’t any way criticism on you. I know there are several of us with finished oil on hand that would like to know the content of what we have.

It would break my heart to toss out good gear just from not knowing
 
Back
Top