PurplePandaLabs Raw source

It’s standard among sources I sell to. Even the large well respected sources here on meso I sell to. If I don’t do this when people take blood tests and my products don’t show as high as other sources, people will think it’s because I underdose my products. Even phamcom states on their website that a variance of +/- 10% is considered acceptable to them

I always brewed with an extra 10% because that's what I learned to do through others and it's held to be a good move imo. Nothing beats true data but an extra 10% never hurts. Unless it's fent....
Even big pharma overdoses their meds by 5%.
The FDA states a +-15% average, and no unit beyond +-25%.


Because his extortion attempt failed. His bullshit arrest story failed and he was too stupid to keep himself in check, so he got banned for his Sak handle.

i'm leaning more towards @Keepittight on this one. The mental breakdown style of trolling fits him perfectly. This isn't the first time he's lost his grip on reality and spammed a thread.
I was waiting for him to elaborate on his cavity search experience.


It was for something. To remind you that you're a mentally ill bottom feeder that can't find acceptance among a gaggle of fucking anonymous people and it eats at you, sending you into a trolling fit that gets you banned every single time.

Looking forward to seeing you with yet another handle, trying desperately to fit in where you don't belong.
He's probably too broke to afford a gym membership, let alone juice.
So he pretends to be tough guy by trolling a steroid board.
 
I haven't had one done, although I have had a prostate exam : (

Now, I have had to squat and cough a few times in my younger years...
 
Even big pharma overdoses their meds by 5%.
The FDA states a +-15% average, and no unit beyond +-25%.

Where did you get these bogus numbers from?

Big Pharma does not overdose...
...and FDA approved 25% variance? Really?

Even for sensitive life saving medicine? Even for fentanyl injected IV to children in recovery after surgery?

25% variance you say?
5% overdose you say?

Please show me where you got this bogus shit from. It's not accurate by any means.
 
Last edited:
But WHY? Have you had one done?
Just for fun.

If he doesn't share his cavity search experience, then he never got arrested.
If he does, then we all can make fun out of him.


I haven't had one done, although I have had a prostate exam : (

Now, I have had to squat and cough a few times in my younger years...
Some fat and tall prison guards are said to have fingers as big as an average dick. :eek:


Where did you get these bogus numbers from?

Big Pharma does not overdose...
...and FDA approved 25% variance? Really?

Even for sensitive life saving medicine? Even for fentanyl injected IV to children in recovery after surgery?

25% variance you say?
5% overdose you say?

Please show me where you got this bogus shit from. It's not accurate by any means.

all I want to see is proof as well. Simple request really
The actual limits are stated in the USP-NF monograph for every specific substance.
And yes, limits are likely tighter for fentanyl anesthetics that for Testosterone or anabolic steroids.

But just as a general reference check out this stability testing for a thyroid med.

Summary of USP<905> (as CU for tablets)
• Limits on individual values in L2
– No unit < 0.75 M and
– No unit > 1.25 M
– That means no unit outside 75 -125 %LC for on target
mean (if the mean is within 1.5% of LC)

https://www.fda.gov/downloads/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofMedicalProductsandTobacco/CDER/UCM341168.pdf

Check out this Cincinnati Univ PhD thesis

Uniformity of dosage units was assessed according to the USP requirements <905> for content uniformity. The batch meets the USP requirements if the amount of the active ingredient in each of the 10 tested tablets lies within the range of 85% to 115% of the label claim and RSD is less than or equal to 6%.
According to the USP criteria, if one of these conditions is not met, additional 20 tablets need to be tested. Not more than 1 unit of the 30 tested should be outside the range of 85% and 115% of the label claim and no unit outside the range of
75% to 125% of label claim; also RSD should not exceed 7.8%.
https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=ucin1054756192&disposition=inline



Grrrrrreat!
Kudos to you

Just make sure they purchase reference standards and do calibration curve runs at least every 10 tests or less, and enjoy becoming the new "Pharmacom of raws".
 
Back
Top