Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic

never seen a such big bunch of sissies having a sook ordering something illegal - bet you lot would cry over mcdonalds orders being too cold
Funniest part is I lost my Well Known Member status for yelling at the idiots in this thread. Now your giving me a hard time for making a few very legitimate posts
Maybe it’s my karma lol
 
Have you ever thought about streamlining the ordering process like Jano does? I can only image all the needless chitchat that slows everything down

1) Customer:
<order details>
<country>
<payment method>

2) You:
<itemized total>
<payment instructions>

3) Customer:
<payment details>
<shipping info>

4). You:
<confirmation>
LOL my orders with QSC are already less communication than this bahahaha.

1) Customer:
<order details>
<shipping info + country>
<payment method>

2) QSC:
"Payment link sent"

3) Customer clicks payment link in email and fills it out.

Then eventually I get a tracking #.
 
And a $50 PayPal fee for the ones scared of crypto
They already do this. Alibaba credit card payment is available for additional 5% fee. Honestly it's not that much more than crypto/exchange fees anyways, and seems worth not having to wait for funds to clear at an exchange. If ordering over Tor with PGP encryption and paying in XMR was an option, maybe that would be worth the crypto hassle, but without that it kind of doesn't matter anyways.
 
Can you elaborate?
Yes. Anyone who can find this unique email could also find the most recent price list. Anyone who can find the most recent price list is likely to also find this unique email. Those with unique email ability would be the same with the ability to already have the recent price list. Many people who can find that most recent price list would be the ones to find the unique email ability.

In a study published on PubMed it was shown that those who can do part A are highly correlated to be people who do Part B. There's apparently an 89% overlap when computed as "area under the curve" taking an independent variable of finding the price list vs. the dependent variable of finding the unique email. It was a slightly different situation, obviously what works in mice isn't always what works in humans.

But Phase 2 trials of a similar method (an analog of Part B, using unique WhatsApp # for latest price list) are underway and the results on clinicaltrials.gov at least give credence to the results of the mouse study.

The core of the issue is that the people who would be helped by Part B are generally already helped by Part A. So either Part A or Part B works great for the same people, but neither one seems to help the people who suffer from lack of response to Part A. Furthermore, similar interventions and analogs of Part B also seem like they won't work.

tl;dr: Some people just drew the short end of the stick, and no interventions have been shown to improve performance for these individuals.
 
Yes. Anyone who can find this unique email could also find the most recent price list. Anyone who can find the most recent price list is likely to also find this unique email. Those with unique email ability would be the same with the ability to already have the recent price list. Many people who can find that most recent price list would be the ones to find the unique email ability.

In a study published on PubMed it was shown that those who can do part A are highly correlated to be people who do Part B. There's apparently an 89% overlap when computed as "area under the curve" taking an independent variable of finding the price list vs. the dependent variable of finding the unique email. It was a slightly different situation, obviously what works in mice isn't always what works in humans.

But Phase 2 trials of a similar method (an analog of Part B, using unique WhatsApp # for latest price list) are underway and the results on clinicaltrials.gov at least give credence to the results of the mouse study.

The core of the issue is that the people who would be helped by Part B are generally already helped by Part A. So either Part A or Part B works great for the same people, but neither one seems to help the people who suffer from lack of response to Part A. Furthermore, similar interventions and analogs of Part B also seem like they won't work.

tl;dr: Some people just drew the short end of the stick, and no interventions have been shown to improve performance for these individuals.
I don't think you explained it well enough. can you do better?
 
I’m truly happy with the order! Fast and high quality service and product. Can’t wait to order masteron or primo! I’m waiting for eu masteron, because I’m afraid of pip with primo. What do u suggest? Did someone experience harsh pip with primo 200? Gonna test it with jano anyway but I’m curious. Thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3097.jpeg
    IMG_3097.jpeg
    1.6 MB · Views: 186
They already do this. Alibaba credit card payment is available for additional 5% fee. Honestly it's not that much more than crypto/exchange fees anyways, and seems worth not having to wait for funds to clear at an exchange. If ordering over Tor with PGP encryption and paying in XMR was an option, maybe that would be worth the crypto hassle, but without that it kind of doesn't matter anyways.

I wouldn't go that far. Transaction fees aren't based on the amount of money so far less than 5%

Also that's a big gripe i have, QSC and company have no skin in the game to practice any OPSEC
 
Last edited:
Back
Top